journal article·2013-07

In situ observation of Cu segregation and phase nucleation at a solid–liquid interface in an Al alloy

Prakash Palanisamy, James M. Howe

Acta Materialia· Volume 61· Issue 12
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract This paper presents a systematic study comparing experimental in situ transmission electron microscopy observation of microstructural and compositional evolution with complementary thermodynamic calculations, to better understand the redistribution of solute elements and the nucleation behavior of different phases in a commercial Al-alloy powder (AA390). The results show that Cu segregation to the solid Si–liquid Al interface, as well as the significant undercooling achieved in the liquid under non-equilibrium conditions because the Al phase cannot nucleate homogeneously, play a important roles in nucleating Al 2 Cu at the interface prior to the Mg 2 Si phase in the alloy. Although Cu segregation can occur at various locations along the interface, the Al 2 Cu phase appears to preferentially nucleate at a high-index Si–liquid interface as opposed to a low-index one. The Cu concentration during segregation remains essentially constant with time, indicating that the observed segregation behavior is a thermodynamic and not a kinetic phenomenon. These in situ observations and complementary thermodynamic calculations substantially enhance our understanding of potential crystal nucleation and growth processes.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Magnesium Alloys: Properties and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (31)

Show source-provided references
1. Cahn · 2001
2. Tiller · 1991
3. Howe · Philos Mag A · 1996 · 74 · 76110.1080/01418619608243540 ↗
4. Williamson · Nat Mater · 2003 · 2 · 53210.1038/nmat944 ↗
5. Donnelly · Science · 2002 · 296 · 50710.1126/science.1068521 ↗
6. Oh · Science · 2005 · 310 · 66110.1126/science.1118611 ↗
7. Howe · MRS Bull · 2004 · 29 · 95110.1557/mrs2004.266 ↗
8. Zheng · Science · 2009 · 324 · 130910.1126/science.1172104 ↗
9. Eswaramoorthy · Science · 2007 · 318 · 143710.1126/science.1146511 ↗
10. Kaplan · Annu Rev Mater Res · 2006 · 36 · 110.1146/annurev.matsci.36.020105.104035 ↗
11. Huisman · Rev Sci Instrum · 1997 · 68 · 416710.1063/1.1148380 ↗
12. Reichert · Nature · 2000 · 408 · 83910.1038/35048537 ↗
13. Miller · Phys Rev Lett · 2005 · 91 · 23810410.1103/PhysRevLett.94.238104 ↗
14. Voitchovsky · Nat Nanotechnol · 2010 · 5 · 40110.1038/nnano.2010.67 ↗
15. Mondolfo · 1976
16. Hegde · J Mater Sci · 2008 · 43 · 300910.1007/s10853-008-2505-5 ↗
17. Cahn RW, Haasen P, editors. Physical metallurgy, vol. I, 4th ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 1996.10.1017/CBO9781107295551 ↗
18. Valimet, 431 East Sperry Road, Stockton, CA, USA.
19. Eswaramoorthy · Microsc Microanal · 2007 · 13 · 29110.1017/S1431927607070699 ↗
20. Kattner · JOM · 1997 · 49 · 1410.1007/s11837-997-0024-5 ↗
21. COST 507. Thermochemical database for light metal alloys, vol. 2. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European communities; 1998.
22. Palanisamy · J Appl Phys · 2011 · 110 · 02490810.1063/1.3609063 ↗
23. Howe · 1997
24. Jackson · 1958
25. Porter · 1991
26. Ramalingam · Interface Sci · 2002 · 10 · 14910.1023/A:1015889313170 ↗
27. Cho · Mater Sci Forum · 2007 · 539–543 · 45210.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.539-543.452 ↗
28. Roosz · Acta Metall Mater · 1990 · 38 · 37510.1016/0956-7151(90)90068-R ↗
29. Hondros · Int Mater Rev · 1977 · 22 · 26210.1179/095066077791100390 ↗
30. Dregia · Acta Metall Mater · 1991 · 39 · 77110.1016/0956-7151(91)90277-8 ↗
31. Palanisamy P. PhD thesis. University of Virginia; 2011.