The role of interface structure in oxidation reactions
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The dynamics of the scale–metal interface exhibits an asymmetry in behavior in oxidation and other scaling reactions depending on whether the mechanism is one of cation or anion-diffusion. For the cation case, the growth step is at the free surface and line defects at the metal–scale interface serve to annihilate vacancies in the scaling mechanism. For the anion case, the growth step is at the scale–metal interface. Disconnections and dislocations provide the growth sites for the reaction and both their topological and elastic properties influence the mechanism. Scaling reactions to form nickel oxide and molybdenum disulfide are considered as examples. Conditions favoring scale fracture are discussed. The results are related to the reactive element effect and to the significance of the Pilling–Bedworth ratio.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Crystallization and Solubility Studies · Electronic and Structural Properties of Oxides · X-ray Diffraction in Crystallography
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (36)
Show source-provided references
1. Pieraggi · Acta Metall · 1988 · 36 · 128110.1016/0001-6160(88)90280-5 ↗
2. Pieraggi · Oxid Met · 1995 · 44 · 6310.1007/BF01046723 ↗
3. Pieraggi · J Electrochem Soc · 1993 · 140 · 284410.1149/1.2220920 ↗
4. Strawbridge · J Electrochem Soc · 1994 · 141 · 190510.1149/1.2055025 ↗
5. Hirth · Acta Mater · 1996 · 44 · 474910.1016/S1359-6454(96)00132-2 ↗
6. Burton · Philos Trans Roy Soc (London) · 1950 · A243 · 299
7. Hirth · Acta Metall Mater · 1994 · 43 · 106510.1016/0956-7151(94)00296-T ↗
8. Pierragi · Mater Sci Forum · 1997 · 251 · 29910.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.251-254.299 ↗
9. Peraldi · Oxid Met · 2002 · 58 · 24910.1023/A:1020170320020 ↗
10. Jones · J Cryst Growth · 1975 · 29 · 15510.1016/0022-0248(75)90219-5 ↗
11. Atkinson · Proc Roy Soc (London) · 1982 · A384 · 10710.1098/rspa.1982.0150 ↗
12. Enomoto · Acta Metall · 1987 · 35 · 93510.1016/0001-6160(87)90172-6 ↗
13. Jones · J Appl Phys · 1971 · 42 · 429910.1063/1.1659770 ↗
14. Atkinson · Proc Roy Soc (London) · 1981 · A378 · 35110.1098/rspa.1981.0156 ↗
15. Lee · J Electrochem Soc · 1984 · 131 · 299810.1149/1.2115456 ↗
16. Sheasby · J Electrochem Soc · 1968 · 115 · 69510.1149/1.2411404 ↗
17. Freund · 2003
18. Hutchinson · Adv Appl Mech · 1992 · 29 · 295
19. Evans · Acta Metall Mater · 1995 · 43 · 2007
20. Woodcock · J Microsc · 2004 · 216 · 12310.1111/j.0022-2720.2004.01396.x ↗
21. Crocker · J Nucl Mater · 1965 · 16 · 30610.1016/0022-3115(65)90119-4 ↗
22. Pond · Philos Mag · 2007 · 87 · 528910.1080/14786430701651721 ↗
23. Pond · Proc Roy Soc (London) · 1983 · A386 · 9510.1098/rspa.1983.0028 ↗
24. Hirth · 1992
25. Bertrand · Oxid Met · 1984 · 21 · 110.1007/BF00659464 ↗
26. Matthews · J Cryst Growth · 1974 · 27 · 118
27. Nix · Scripta Mater · 1998 · 39 · 54510.1016/S1359-6462(98)00195-X ↗
28. Kamat · J Appl Phys · 1990 · 67 · 684410.1063/1.345074 ↗
29. Nix · J Mater Res · 1999 · 14 · 346710.1557/JMR.1999.0468 ↗
30. Yurek · Oxid Met · 1976 · 10 · 25510.1007/BF00618247 ↗
31. Woo · Mater High Temp · 2003 · 20 · 59310.3184/096034003782750178 ↗
32. Rapp · Trans Met Soc AIME · 1966 · 236 · 1616
33. Eshelby · Philos Mag · 1958 · 3 · 7510.1080/14786435808243228 ↗
34. Short · J Chem Phys · 1972 · 57 · 138110.1063/1.1678414 ↗
35. Chevalier · Oxid Met · 1997 · 47 · 157310.1007/BF01682371 ↗
36. Shewmon · 1963