Impact of Pavement Roughness on Cost and Emissions: A Network-Level Study in Oregon
Source abstract
Abstract
ABSTRACT This research study aimed to assess the impact of pavement smoothness across the roadway network in Oregon and analyze various scenarios to identify opportunities for reducing financial expenditures and emissions via reductions in overall roadway roughness levels. An analysis of 20 years of Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT)’s International Roughness Index (IRI) data shows that reducing pavement roughness to 40 in/mi could yield substantial benefits, an estimated $142 million in annual cost savings and a reduction of 423,462 metric tons (MT) of CO2 emissions per year. Maintaining an IRI of 65 in/mi, even if 40 in/mi is not feasible, yields major benefits, about $45 million in annual savings and a 134,927 MT CO2e reduction, nearly matching ODOT’s total yearly emissions of 182,592 MT. These benefits are influenced by the adoption of electric vehicles, which could reduce both cost and emissions savings by approximately 4–16 % and 4–10 %, respectively. Within Oregon, focusing maintenance on the highest-traffic roads and maintaining IRI at 40 in/mi could result in annual savings ranging from $49 million to $126 million and emission reductions of 262,082 to 427,829 MT of CO2, depending on whether 3 %, 6 %, or 12 % of the network is maintained. Overall, the study reflects the massive impact of pavement roughness on the road user costs and the associated emissions considering different scenarios for Oregon road network. The potential savings could be even greater if smoother pavements are combined with the use of sustainable materials in asphalt production.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Smart Materials for Construction
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Civil and Construction Engineering, Oregon State University 1 , Kearney Hall, 1491 SW Campus Way, Corvallis, Oregon 97331 ,
School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Oregon State University 2 , Kelley Engineering Center, 1148, 2461 SW Campus Way, Corvallis, Oregon 97331 ,
School of Civil and Construction Engineering, Oregon State University 3 , Kearney Hall, 1491 SW Campus Way, Corvallis, Oregon 97331 ,
Funding
Oregon Department of Transportation
References (43)
Show source-provided references
1. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) · 2022
2. Effect of Pavement Roughness on User Costs10.3141/2285-06 ↗
3. Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions through Strategic Management of Highway Pavement Roughness10.1088/1748-9326/9/3/034007 ↗
4. Assessment of Aggregate-Binder Adhesion through Field-Applicable Modified Sweep, Vialit, and Pull-off Tests10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2025.142495 ↗
5. ODOT Climate Office, “ODOT Climate Office” (2021), https://www.oregon.gov/odot/climate/Pages/default.aspx
6. J. Harvey, J. Lea, C. Kim, et al., Simulation of Cumulative Annual Impact of Pavement Structural Response on Vehicle Fuel Economy for California Test Sections (University of California Pavement Research Center, 2016).
7. M. M. Robbins and N. H. Tran, A Synthesis Report: Value of Pavement Smoothness and Ride Quality to Roadway Users and the Impact of Pavement Roughness on Vehicle Operating Costs, NCAT Report 16-03 (National Center for Asphalt Technology, 2016).
8. Impact of Pavement Roughness on Fuel Consumption for a Range of Vehicle Types10.1061/jpeodx.0000272 ↗
9. The Importance of the Use Phase on the LCA of Environmentally Friendly Solutions for Asphalt Road Pavements10.1016/J.TRD.2014.07.006 ↗
10. Rolling Resistance Contribution to a Road Pavement Life Cycle Carbon Footprint Analysis10.1007/s11367-016-1203-9 ↗
11. U. Sandberg, U. Hammarström, M. Haider, et al., Rolling Resistance: Basic Information and State-of-the-Art on Measurement Methods, MIRIAM SP 1 (2011).
12. R. J. Willis, M. M. Robbins, and M. Thompson, “NCAT 14-07: Effects of Pavement Properties on Vehicular Rolling Resistance: A Literature Review” (2015), https://eng.auburn.edu/research/centers/ncat/files/reports/2014/rep14-07.pdf
13. Critical Review of Flexible Pavement Performance Models10.1007/s12205-014-0255-2 ↗
14. Estimating the Effects of Traffic Congestion on Fuel Consumption and Vehicle Emissions Based on Acceleration Noise10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2007)133:2(96) ↗
15. M. Treiber, A. Kesting, and C. Thiemann, “How Much Does Traffic Congestion Increase Fuel Consumption and Emissions? Applying Fuel Consumption Model to NGSIM Trajectory Data,” in 87th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board (Transportation Research Board, 2008).
16. Combined Influence of Traffic Conditions, Driving Behavior, and Type of Road on Fuel Consumption. Real Driving Data from Madrid Area10.1080/15568318.2020.1871128 ↗
17. Impact of Road Gradient on Fuel Consumption of Light-Duty Diesel Vehicles10.3390/ATMOS16020143 ↗
18. Impact of Road Geometry on Vehicle Energy Consumption and CO2 Emissions: An Energy-Efficiency Rating Methodology10.3390/EN13010119 ↗
19. Life Cycle CO2 Analysis of Low Rolling Resistance Asphalt Pavements
20. Impact of Pavement Roughness and Suspension Systems on Vehicle Dynamic Loads on Flexible Pavements10.1016/j.treng.2021.100045 ↗
21. K. L. Smith, K. D. Smith, L. D. Evans, T. E. Hoerner, M. I. Darter, and J. H. Woodstrom, Smoothness Specifications for Pavements, NCHRP Project 1-31 (Transportation Research Board, 1997).
22. K. Chatti and I. Zaabar, Estimating the Effects of Pavement Condition on Vehicle Operating Costs, NCHRP Report 720 (Transportation Research Board, 2012).10.17226/22808 ↗
23. S. Haddadi, E. Coleri, and B. Wruck, A Network-Level Decision Making Tool for Pavement Maintenance and User Safety (University of Washington, 2017).
24. Model Development, Field Section Characterization, and Model Comparison for Excess Vehicle Fuel Use Attributed to Pavement Structural Response10.3141/2589-05 ↗
25. E. Coleri, S. Gibson, S. Baran, and M. Sukhija, The Impact of Declining Roadway Conditions on Road User Costs and Greenhouse Gas Emissions (Oregon Department of Transportation, 2025), https://www.oregon.gov/odot/Programs/ResearchDocuments/Climate_Challenge_SmoothnessImpact.pdf
26. J. Proudfoot and A. Toneys, “Oregon Department of Transportation Operational Greenhouse Gas Reductions: Best Practices and Recommendations” (2022), https://www.oregon.gov/odot/Programs/TDD%20Documents/ODOT%20Operational%20GHG%20Reductions%20-%20BPs%20and%20Recs%20--%20FINAL%202022.01.05.pdf
27. U.S. Energy Information Administration, “Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Prices” (2024), https://www.eia.gov/petroleum/gasdiesel/
28. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, “Consumer Price Index (CPI)” (2024), https://www.bls.gov/cpi/
29. Environmental Protection Agency, “Greenhouse Gases Equivalencies Calculator” (2024), https://www.epa.gov/energy/greenhouse-gas-equivalencies-calculator-calculations-and-references
30. S. Unnasch, P. Debasish, and D. H. Brian, GHG Emissions Reductions due to the RFS2 - A 2022 Update, LCA.6145.238.2023 (Life Cycle Associates, 2023).
31. D. Reichmuth, J. Dunn, and D. Anair, “Driving Cleaner: Electric Cars and Pickups Beat Gasoline on Lifetime Global Warming Emissions” (Union of Concerned Scientists, 2022), https://www.ucs.org/resources/driving-cleaner10.47923/2022.14657 ↗
32. Centre for Remanufacturing and Reuse, “The Carbon Footprint of Retreaded Versus New Light Commercial Vehicle Tyres” (2019).
33. State-Level Emission Trends from Battery Electric Vehicle Adoption in the U.S.10.1007/s10668-025-06500-0 ↗
34. EVAdoption, “Cumulative U.S. Electric Vehicles in Operation: 2010–2030” (2024), https://www.paren.app/
35. Bureau of Transportation Statistics, “Number of U.S. Aircraft, Vehicles, Vessels, and Other Conveyances” (2023), https://www.bts.gov/content/number-us-aircraft-vehicles-vessels-and-other-conveyances
36. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, “National Population Projections 2014–2060 Request” (2023), https://wonder.cdc.gov/population-projections-2014-2060.html
37. Oregon Transportation Emissions Website, “Oregon Transportation Emissions – Resources” (2024), https://www.oregontransportationemissions.com/resources
38. 2022 Pavement Condition Report
39. ODOT Pavement Services Unit · 2019
40. The Case for Performance Standards - FHWA-HIF-07-012 - Construction - Federal Highway Administration (n.d.). Retrieved April 16, 2026, from https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/construction/pubs/hif07012/10.cfm
41. Benchmarking the Performance of Asphalt Mixtures for the Implementation of Balanced Mix Design (Bmd) in Oregon10.1080/10298436.2025.2489760 ↗
42. Integrating Balanced Mix Design for High Reclaimed Asphalt Pavements in Oregon: Adjustment in Binder Content and Binder Grade10.1080/10298436.2025.2508342 ↗
43. Exploring the Implementation of Balanced Mix Design (BMD) in Oregon, United States: A Case Study10.1080/10298436.2025.2612226 ↗