journal article·2012-06

Mechanics prediction of the fracture pattern on scratching wafers of single crystal silicon

Tania Vodenitcharova, Oscar Borrero-López, Mark Hoffman

Acta Materialia· Volume 60· Issue 11
Publisher page

Abstract

The effect of anisotropy on the response and fracture pattern on scratching {1 0 0} and {1 1 1} single crystal silicon wafers in two characteristic directions, i.e. < 1 0 0 > and < 1 1 0 > in a {1 0 0} wafer, and < 1 1 0 > and < 1 1 2 > in a {1 1 1} wafer, respectively, was studied. Predictions of the locations of the onset of fracture, as well as the fracture patterns on the wafer surfaces, were obtained applying a "minimum crack length" criterion assisted by numerical determination of the stress states using the finite element method. It was found that the first crack appears on the {1 1 1} or {1 1 0} cleavage plane. The < 1 1 2 > scratching direction on the {1 1 1} wafer is the weakest among the four directions studied, since it provides the highest resolved tensile stress and the shortest initial defect for crack propagation. The < 1 0 0 > scratching direction in the {1 0 0} wafer appears to be strongest. Experiments validated the approach and also showed a higher reliability in the {1 0 0} < 1 0 0 > and {1 1 1} < 1 1 0 > directions. The methodology used in this manuscript can be applied to the determination of fracture patterns in other single crystal materials, under scratching or other mechanical loading conditions. (C) 2012 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Surface Polishing Techniques · Advanced machining processes and optimization · Integrated Circuits and Semiconductor Failure Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (21)

Show source-provided references
1. Nalwa · 2001
2. Gogotsi · Semicond Sci Technol · 2001 · 16 · 34510.1088/0268-1242/16/5/311 ↗
3. Chao · J Mater Process Technol · 2002 · 127 · 18710.1016/S0924-0136(02)00124-3 ↗
4. Domnich · Rev Adv Mater Sci · 2002 · 3 · 110.1016/S1468-6996(01)00150-4 ↗
5. Wachtman · 1996
6. Green · 1998
7. Lawn · Proc Roy Soc Lond · 1967 · 299 · 307
8. Leu · J Mater Sci · 1988 · 23 · 300610.1007/BF00547483 ↗
9. Borrero-Lopez · Scripta Mater · 2010 · 63 · 99710.1016/j.scriptamat.2010.07.024 ↗
10. Lawn · J Mater Sci · 1984 · 19 · 256110.1007/BF00550810 ↗
11. Li · J Mater Process Technol · 1996 · 57 · 20710.1016/0924-0136(95)02090-X ↗
12. American Society for Testing and Materials. Standard test method for adhesion strength and mechanical failure modes of ceramic coatings by quantitative single point scratch testing. ASTM C1624-05. Philadelphia (PA): ASTM International; 2005.
13. Jing · J Am Ceram Soc · 2007 · 90 · 88510.1111/j.1551-2916.2006.01471.x ↗
14. Vodenitcharova · J Mater Process Technol · 2007 · 194 · 5210.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.03.125 ↗
15. ANSYS Inc. · 2010
16. Cairney · Surf Coat Technol · 2005 · 198 · 16510.1016/j.surfcoat.2004.10.042 ↗
17. American Society for Testing and Materials. Standard practice for reporting uniaxial strength data and estimating Weibull distribution parameters for advanced ceramics. C1239-07. Philadelphia (PA): ASTM International; 2007.
18. Bhowmick · Acta Mater · 2009 · 57 · 58210.1016/j.actamat.2008.10.006 ↗
19. Vodenitcharova · Int J Solids Struct · 2004 · 41 · 541110.1016/j.ijsolstr.2004.04.025 ↗
20. Vodenitcharova · Int J Solids Struct · 2003 · 40 · 298910.1016/S0020-7683(03)00119-7 ↗
21. Zarudi · J Mater Res · 2004 · 19 · 33210.1557/jmr.2004.19.1.332 ↗