journal article·2003-09

Effects of surface passivation and interfacial reaction on the size-dependent 2p-level shift of supported copper nanosolids

Chang Q. Sun, L.K. Pan, H.L. Bai, Z.Q. Li, P. Wu, E.Y. Jiang

Acta Materialia· Volume 51· Issue 15
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Effects of surface passivation and particle-substrate interfacial reaction on the size dependent 2p3/2-level shift of nanosolid Cu have been numerically analyzed, leading to information about the reactivity of Cu nanosolid with different substrates, such as graphite, polymer and alumina. It has been found that Ar+ bombardment promotes the Cu-polymer reaction and N+ passivation strengthens the surface bond due to nitride formation. Cu atom interacts with alumina slightly stronger at room temperature than at 80 K. Matching predictions to the measured size-dependent Cu-2p level shift reveals that the intra-atomic trapping energy of a core electron at the Cu 2p3/2-level is −931.0 eV and the bulk crystal bonding intensity to the 2p3/2 electron is −1.70 eV, which is beyond the scope of conventional approaches.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Semiconductor materials and devices · Copper Interconnects and Reliability · Electron and X-Ray Spectroscopy Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (38)

Show source-provided references
1. Edelstein · 1996
2. Gleiter H. Prog Mater Sci 1989;33:223.10.1016/0079-6425(89)90001-7 ↗
3. Goldstein AN, Echer CM, Alivisatos AP. Science 1992;256:1425.10.1126/science.256.5062.1425 ↗
4. Lu L, Sui ML, Lu K. Science 2000;287:1463.10.1126/science.287.5457.1463 ↗
5. Christenson HK. J Phys Condens Matt 2000;13:R95.10.1088/0953-8984/13/11/201 ↗
6. Zhang Z, Li JC, Jiang Q. J Phys D 2000;33:2653.10.1088/0022-3727/33/20/318 ↗
7. Mintova S, Olson NH, Valtchev V, Bein T. Science 1999;283:958.10.1126/science.283.5404.958 ↗
8. Campbell CT, Parker SC, Starr DE. Science 2002;298:811.10.1126/science.1075094 ↗
9. Horch S, Lorensen HT, Helveg S, Laegsgaard E, Stensgaard I, Jacobsen KW, Norskov JK, Besenbacher F. Nature 1999;398:134.10.1038/18185 ↗
10. van Buuren T, Dinh LN, Chase LL, Siekhaus WJ, Terminello LJ. Phys Rev Lett 1998;80:3803.10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.3803 ↗
11. Yoffe AD. Adv Phys 2001;50:1.10.1080/00018730010006608 ↗
12. Yoffe AD. Adv Phys 2002;51:799.10.1080/00018730110117451 ↗
13. Tan OK, Zhu W, Yan Q, Kong LB. Sensors and Actuators B 2000;65:361.10.1016/S0925-4005(99)00414-1 ↗
14. Rao CNR, Kulkarni GU, Thomas PJ, Edwards PP. Chem European J 2002;8:29.10.1002/1521-3765(20020104)8:1<28::AID-CHEM28>3.0.CO;2-B ↗
15. Sun CQ, Gong HQ, Hing P, Ye HT. Surf Rev Lett 1999;6:L171.10.1142/S0218625X99000196 ↗
16. Pan LK, Sun CQ, Tay BK, Chen TP, Li S. J Phys Chem B 2002;106:11725.10.1021/jp0266805 ↗
17. Sun CQ, Li S, Tay BK, Chen TP. Acta Materialia 2002;50:4687.10.1016/S1359-6454(02)00343-9 ↗
18. Borgohain K, Singh JB, Rao MVR, Shripathi T, Mahamuni S. Phys Rev B 2000;61:11093.10.1103/PhysRevB.61.11093 ↗
19. Yang DQ, Sacher E. Appl Surf Sci 2002;195:187.10.1016/S0169-4332(02)00545-7 ↗
20. Wu Y, Garfunkel E, Madey TE. J Vac Sci Technol A 1996;14:1662.10.1116/1.580315 ↗
21. Ohgi T, Fujita D. Phys Rev B 2002;66:115410.10.1103/PhysRevB.66.115410 ↗
22. Schmeißer D, et al. Phys Rev Lett 1999;83:380.10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.380 ↗
23. Aldén M, Skriver HL, Johansson B. Phys Rev Lett 1993;71:2449.10.1103/PhysRevLett.71.2449 ↗
24. Navas E, et al. Phys Rev B 1993;48:14753.10.1103/PhysRevB.48.14753 ↗
25. Bartynski RA, Heskett D, Garrison K, Watson G, Zehner DM, Mei WN, Tong SY, Pan X. J Vac Sci Technol 1989;A7:1931.10.1116/1.575988 ↗
26. Balasubramanian T, Andersen JN, Wallden L. Phys Rev 2001;B64:205420.10.1103/PhysRevB.64.205420 ↗
27. Sun CQ, Tay BK, Zeng X, Li S, Chen TP, Zhou J, Bai H, Jiang EY. J Phys Condens Matt 2002;14:7781.10.1088/0953-8984/14/34/301 ↗
28. Sun CQ, Wang Y, Tay BK, Li S, Huang H, Zhang YB. J Phys Chem B 2002;106:10701.10.1021/jp025868l ↗
29. Schuppler S, Friedman SL, Marcus MA, Adler DL, Xie YH, Ross FM, Chabal YJ, Harris TD, Brus LE, Brown WL, Chaban EE, Szajowski PF, Christman SB, Citrin PH. Phys Rev B 1995;52:4910.10.1103/PhysRevB.52.4910 ↗
30. Mason MG. Phys Rev B 1983;27:748.10.1103/PhysRevB.27.748 ↗
31. Huang H., Sun CQ, Zhang T, Hing P. Phys Rev B 2001;63:184112.10.1103/PhysRevB.63.184112 ↗
32. Egelhoff Jr. WF, Tibbetts GG. Phys Rev B 1979;19:5028.10.1103/PhysRevB.19.5028 ↗
33. Burkstrand JM. Phys Rev B 1979;20:4853.10.1103/PhysRevB.20.4853 ↗
34. Chtaib M, Ghijsen J, Pireaux JJ, Caudano R, Johnson RL, Ortí E, Brédas JL. Phys Rev B1991;44:10815.10.1103/PhysRevB.44.10815 ↗
35. Diebold U, Pan JM, Mandey TE. Phys Rev B 1993;47:3868.10.1103/PhysRevB.47.3868 ↗
36. Sun CQ. Surf Rev Lett 2001;8:367. Sun CQ. Surf Rev Lett 2001;8:703.
37. Sun CQ. Oxidation electronics. Prog Mater Sci (in press).
38. Sun CQ. Appl Phys Lett 1998;72:1706.10.1063/1.121158 ↗