Monte Carlo simulation of grain boundary segregation and decohesion in NiAl
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Grand canonical Monte Carlo simulations are performed to study grain boundary segregation in the ordered intermetallic compound NiAl. The embedded atom method is applied to model atomic interactions in NiAl. The structure and chemical composition of Σ=5 (210) [001] and Σ=5 (310) [001] symmetrical tilt grain boundaries are studied as functions of the bulk composition at 1200 K. The grain boundaries tend to be enriched in Ni. Deviations of the bulk composition from the stoichiometry towards Ni-rich compositions increase local disorder and enhance Ni segregation at the grain boundaries. In one of the boundaries, the Ni segregation induces a structural transformation to a new metastable grain boundary structure. The effect of grain boundary disorder and segregation on grain boundary decohesion is evaluated by simulated tensile tests.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Intermetallics and Advanced Alloy Properties · nanoparticles nucleation surface interactions · Advanced Materials Characterization Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. Miracle · Acta Metall Mater · 1993 · 41 · 64910.1016/0956-7151(93)90001-9 ↗
2. Noebe · Int Mater Rev · 1993 · 38 · 19310.1179/imr.1993.38.4.193 ↗
3. 1977
4. Sutton · 1995
5. Howe · 1997
6. Menyhard · Acta Metall Mater · 1994 · 42 · 278310.1016/0956-7151(94)90219-4 ↗
7. Creuze · Phys Rev. B · 2000 · 62 · 281310.1103/PhysRevB.62.2813 ↗
8. Najafabadi · 1991 · 51
9. Yan · 1992 · 335
10. Petton · Scripta Metall Mater · 1991 · 25 · 5510.1016/0956-716X(91)90353-3 ↗
11. Mishin · Phil Mag. A · 1998 · 78 · 2910.1080/01418619808244800 ↗
12. Yan · Acta Mater · 1996 · 44 · 435110.1016/1359-6454(96)00117-6 ↗
13. Fonda · Phil Mag Lett · 1995 · 71 · 22110.1080/09500839508241285 ↗
14. MishinY, Mehl MJ, Papaconstantopoulos DA. 2002 Phys Rev B 2002; 65: 224114.10.1103/PhysRevB.65.224114 ↗
15. Vitek · Phil Mag · 1968 · 73 · 77310.1080/14786436808227500 ↗
16. Vitek · Cryst Latt Def · 1974 · 5 · 1
17. Foiles · Phys Rev. B · 1985 · 32 · 768510.1103/PhysRevB.32.7685 ↗
18. Foiles · Phys Rev. B · 1989 · 40 · 1150210.1103/PhysRevB.40.11502 ↗
19. Seki · Acta Metall Mater · 1991 · 39 · 317910.1016/0956-7151(91)90052-3 ↗
20. Udler · Phys Stat. Sol. B · 1992 · 172 · 26710.1002/pssb.2221720124 ↗
21. Udler · Acta Metall Mater · 1994 · 42 · 195910.1016/0956-7151(94)90021-3 ↗
22. Bradley · Proc Roy. Soc. A · 1937 · 159 · 5610.1098/rspa.1937.0056 ↗
23. Guggenheim · 1986
24. Donald · Phil Mag · 1976 · 34 · 118510.1080/00318087608227739 ↗
25. Luzzi · Phil Mag Lett · 1991 · 63 · 28110.1080/09500839108214656 ↗
26. Eastman · J Am Ceram Soc · 1986 · 69 · 75310.1111/j.1151-2916.1986.tb07337.x ↗
27. Sickafus · Scripta Metall · 1984 · 18 · 16510.1016/0036-9748(84)90498-8 ↗
28. Lin · Scripta Metall · 1988 · 22 · 73510.1016/S0036-9748(88)80192-3 ↗
29. Lin · Scripta Metall · 1988 · 22 · 156910.1016/S0036-9748(88)80040-1 ↗
30. Hashimoto · Acta Metall · 1984 · 32 · 110.1016/0001-6160(84)90195-0 ↗
31. Udler · Phys Rev Lett · 1996 · 77 · 337910.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3379 ↗
32. Rittner · Acta Metall Mater · 1997 · 45 · 319110.1016/S1359-6454(97)00002-5 ↗
33. Mishin · Phil Mag. A · 1997 · 75 · 16910.1080/01418619708210289 ↗
34. Hagen · Mater Sci Forum · 1996 · 207-209 · 24510.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.207-209.245 ↗