Structure evolution in dilute Al(Cu) alloys observed by 63Cu NMR
Source abstract
Abstract
63Cu NMR has been used to observe the evolution of the precipitate structures in the solution treated and quenched dilute alloy Al-1.7 at%Cu following thermal aging. The distinguishable phases in this alloy form in the following sequence (i) fcc α-phase with Cu in random substitutional sites, (ii) Guinier-Preston zones, (iii) θ″-phase, (iv) θ′-phase and finally (v) θ-phase, where the last two phases are structural variants of CuAl2. The Cu site in all five of these phases has been detected as a resolved line in the 63Cu FT-NMR spectrum at room temperature, together with a line assigned to surface Cu sites on θ′-phase platelets. Two additional lines have been observed in spectra from specimens containing the θ-phase due to Cu substituting for Al in the CuAl2 structure, and Cu in the CuAl η2-phase. Density functional based ab initio electronic structure calculations have been used to reproduce accurately the observed electric field gradient (Vzz) at the Cu site in θ-phase CuAl2 and to explain the relatively narrow 63Cu lines observed for GP-zones, θ″-phase and θ′-phase.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties · Quasicrystal Structures and Properties · Microstructure and mechanical properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (19)
Show source-provided references
1. Preston GD. Nature (London) 1938;142:570.10.1038/142570a0 ↗
2. Preston GD. Proc Roy Soc A 1938;167:526.10.1098/rspa.1938.0152 ↗
3. Preston GD. Phil Mag 1938;26:855.10.1080/14786443808562177 ↗
4. Guinier A. Nature (London) 1938;142:569.10.1038/142569b0 ↗
5. Silcock JM, Heal TJ, Hardy HK. J Inst Metals 1953;82:239.
6. Gerold V. Script met 1988;22:927.10.1016/S0036-9748(88)80077-2 ↗
7. Karlik M, Jouffrey B. Acta mater 1997;45:3251.10.1016/S1359-6454(97)00003-7 ↗
8. Murray J. International Metal Reviews 1985;30:211.10.1179/imr.1985.30.1.211 ↗
9. Meetsma A, der Boer JL, van Smaalen S. J Solid State Chem 1989;83:370.10.1016/0022-4596(89)90188-6 ↗
10. Slichter · 1990
11. Drain LE. Met Rev 1967;119:195.10.1179/imr.1967.12.1.195 ↗
12. Nakamura F, Matsumo N, Furakawa K, Takamura J. Phil Mag A 1977;36:1355.10.1080/14786437708238521 ↗
13. Nakamura F, Furakawa K, Ebine T, Takamura J. Phil Mag A 1980;41:307.10.1080/01418618008239314 ↗
14. Nakamura F, Furakawa K, Yanai M, Takamura J. Phil Mag A 1986;54:67.10.1080/01418618608242883 ↗
15. Yamaguchi S, Wagatuma F, Shinohara T. Phil Mag Letters 1999;79:171.10.1080/095008399177408 ↗
16. Massiot D, Fayon F, Capron M, King I, Le Calvé S, Alonso B, Durand J-O, Bujoli B, Gan Z, Hoatson G. Magnetic Resonance in Chemistry 2002;40:70.10.1002/mrc.984 ↗
17. Blaha · 1999
18. Azevedo LJ, Schirber JE, Switendick AC, Baughman RJ, Morosin B. J Phys F: Metal Phys 1981;11:1521.10.1088/0305-4608/11/7/024 ↗
19. Smith ME, Gibson MA, Forwood CT, Bastow TJ, Phil Mag 1995:A74;791.10.1080/01418619608243542 ↗