Atomistic configurational effects on piezoelectric properties of La3Ta0.5Ga5.5O14 and a new piezoelectric crystal design
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Single crystalline langatate (LTG, La 3 Ta 0.5 Ga 5.5 O 14 ) has been widely used as a sensor material in high temperature applications because of its thermally stable piezoelectric properties. In this research, to elucidate the relationship between piezoelectric tensors and local ionic configurations, first-principles calculations based on density functional perturbation theory (DFPT) were performed on various local ionic structures. The results indicate that two independent relaxed-ion piezoelectric coefficients, e 11 and e 14 , increased with increases in La ( 3e ) –O and Ta ( 1a ) –O distances or decreases in Ga ( 3f , 2d ) –O distances. Thus, to obtain high piezoelectric constants in this crystal, ions larger than La 3+ should be incorporated at 3e sites to open the distance between 3e ions and oxygen ions, and ions smaller than Ga 3+ should be introduced at 2d and 3f sites to reduce the distance between Ga and O ions. Finally, from this design rule, a new crystal, BTAS (Ba 3 TaAl 3 Si 2 O 14 ), which belongs to the same P321 group, is proposed. The calculated relaxed-ion piezoelectric coefficient e 11 of BTAS was 17.7% higher than the coefficient of a LTG crystal. This significant increase confirms BTAS as a useful new piezo-material, especially in applications where there is also a need to reduce the use of more expensive elements.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Acoustic Wave Resonator Technologies · Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Ferroelectric and Piezoelectric Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (21)
Show source-provided references
1. Takeda · Jpn J Appl Phys · 1997 · 36 · L91910.1143/JJAP.36.L919 ↗
2. Yaokawa · J Appl Phys · 2010 · 108 · 06411210.1063/1.3478772 ↗
3. Dudka · Crystallogr Rep · 2009 · 54 · 55810.1134/S106377450904004X ↗
4. Onozato · Jpn J Appl Phys · 2000 · 39 · 302810.1143/JJAP.39.3028 ↗
5. Bohm · J Cryst Growth · 2000 · 216 · 29310.1016/S0022-0248(00)00440-1 ↗
6. Takeda · J Alloys Compd · 2006 · 408–412 · 47410.1016/j.jallcom.2004.12.108 ↗
7. Zheng · J Phys: Conf Ser · 2006 · 29 · 61
8. Wu · Phys Rev B · 2005 · 72 · 03510510.1103/PhysRevB.72.035105 ↗
9. Gonze · Phys Rev B · 1997 · 55 · 1035510.1103/PhysRevB.55.10355 ↗
10. Nye · 1985
11. Ballato · IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control · 1995 · 42 · 91610.1109/58.464826 ↗
12. Perdew · Phys Rev Lett · 1996 · 77 · 386510.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
13. Kresse · Comput Mater Sci · 1996 · 6 · 1510.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-0 ↗
14. Chung · J Appl Phys · 2010 · 108 · 11350510.1063/1.3514008 ↗
15. Heyd · J Chem Phys · 2003 · 118 · 820710.1063/1.1564060 ↗
16. Kim · Phys Rev B · 2009 · 80 · 03520310.1103/PhysRevB.80.035203 ↗
17. Gillan · J Phys: Condens Matter · 1989 · 1 · 689
18. Anisimov · Phys Rev B · 1991 · 44 · 94310.1103/PhysRevB.44.943 ↗
19. Henkelman · Comput Mater Sci · 2006 · 36 · 25410.1016/j.commatsci.2005.04.010 ↗
20. Xin · Appl Phys Lett · 2008 · 93 · 25290110.1063/1.3025545 ↗
21. Xin · Cryst Growth Des · 2008 · 8 · 261710.1021/cg800354q ↗