journal article·2021-06

Universal prediction of strain footprints via simulation, statistics, and machine learning: low-Σ grain boundaries

Matthew T. Curnan, Wissam A. Saidi, Judith C. Yang, Jeong Woo Han

Acta Materialia· Volume 211
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Interface engineering usually imposes a trade-off between catalytic activity, product selectivity, and property tunability, facilitating multiple product yields. Due to their structural disorder, metal grain boundaries (GBs) can be constructed to satisfy all of these conditions. Though experiments show GB catalytic footprints are determined by dislocation-induced elastic strain, the atomistic structural and energetic origins of GB catalytic performance are not currently known. In former models solely reviewing metastable GBs defined by macroscopic degrees of freedom (DOFs), exceptional low-Σ GBs anticipated by the coincident site lattice model cannot be consistently discerned. Herein, a structure-energy correlation linking changes in atomistic properties to physical models is developed, distinguishing exceptional GBs from unexceptional high-angle GBs over structural DOFs. This work constructs particular GB elastic responses by varying three microscopic DOFs, comparing low-Σ distinguished and other GB responses via a directed statistical approach. Such elastic properties successfully distinguish low-Σ GBs from high-angle grain boundaries (HAGBs) by their strain-related footprints without failure of a single unique GB structure and composition combination. A priori application of machine learning classification is completed using metastable GB and elastic response related properties. This classification not only validates distinguished strain footprints, but also identifies GB subgroups with footprints unexpected by former models.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Machine Learning in Materials Science · Microstructure and mechanical properties · X-ray Diffraction in Crystallography

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (52)

Show source-provided references
1. A Direct Grain-Boundary-Activity Correlation for CO Electroreduction on Cu Nanoparticles10.1021/acscentsci.6b00022 ↗
2. Stability of Residual Oxides in Oxide-Derived Copper Catalysts for Electrochemical CO2 Reduction Investigated with 18O Labeling10.1002/anie.201710590 ↗
3. Selective increase in CO2 electroreduction activity at grain-boundary surface terminations10.1126/science.aao3691 ↗
4. Direct observation of individual dislocation interaction processes with grain boundaries10.1126/sciadv.1501926 ↗
5. Predicting phase behavior of grain boundaries with evolutionary search and machine learning10.1038/s41467-018-02937-2 ↗
6. Controlling the corrosion behavior of CoNiFe medium entropy alloy by grain boundary engineering10.1016/j.matchar.2020.110323 ↗
7. On the relationship between grain boundary connectivity, coincident site lattice boundaries, and intergranular stress corrosion cracking10.1016/j.corsci.2004.01.019 ↗
8. On a more restrictive geometric criterion for special CSL grain boundaries10.1016/S1359-6462(98)00077-3 ↗
9. Tuning the selectivity and activity of Au catalysts for carbon dioxide electroreduction via grain boundary engineering: a DFT study10.1039/C6TA10733H ↗
10. Overview no. 61 On geometric criteria for low interfacial energy10.1016/0001-6160(87)90067-8 ↗
11. A read-shockley model for high-angle grain boundaries10.1016/0036-9748(89)90348-7 ↗
12. Grain-boundary metastability and its statistical properties10.1016/j.actamat.2015.11.035 ↗
13. On the mechanisms of grain boundary migration10.1016/S1359-6454(01)00343-3 ↗
14. Surface and interface stress effects in thin films10.1016/0079-6816(94)90005-1 ↗
15. First-Principles Calculation of Grain Boundary Excess Volume and Free Volume in Nanocrystalline and Ultrafine-Grained Aluminum10.2320/matertrans.L-M2013816 ↗
16. Non-coherent Cu grain boundaries driven by continuous vacancy loading10.1007/s10853-015-8961-9 ↗
17. Test of the Peierls-Nabarro model for dislocations in silicon10.1103/PhysRevB.52.13223 ↗
18. Symmetric and asymmetric tilt grain boundary structure and energy in Cu and Al (and transferability to other fcc metals)10.1186/s40192-015-0040-1 ↗
19. Structure-energy correlation for grain boundaries in F.C.C. metals—I. Boundaries on the (111) and (100) planes10.1016/0001-6160(89)90082-5 ↗
20. Correlation between energy and volume expansion for grain boundaries in FCC metals10.1016/0036-9748(89)90482-1 ↗
21. Ab initio calculations of grain boundaries in bcc metals10.1088/0965-0393/24/3/035013 ↗
22. Energy and electrical resistivity of high-angle grain boundaries in metals10.1016/0001-6160(59)90030-6 ↗
23. Diffusion-accomodated rigid-body translations along grain boundaries in nanostructured materials10.1016/S0921-5093(03)00354-X ↗
24. Grain Boundaries: Description, Structure and Thermodynamics
25. Non-equilibrium grain boundary structure and inelastic deformation using atomistic simulations10.1016/j.ijplas.2010.09.011 ↗
26. Computer modeling and simulation of solid-state sintering: A phase field approach10.1016/j.actamat.2005.10.032 ↗
27. Grain boundary energy anisotropy: a review10.1007/s10853-011-5677-3 ↗
28. Validating computed grain boundary energies in fcc metals using the grain boundary character distribution10.1016/j.actamat.2011.05.001 ↗
29. Two-phase solid–liquid coexistence of Ni, Cu, and Al by molecular dynamics simulations using the modified embedded-atom method10.1016/j.actamat.2014.12.010 ↗
30. Structures and energies of Σ 3 asymmetric tilt grain boundaries in copper and aluminium10.1080/14786430701255895 ↗
31. Data analytics using canonical correlation analysis and Monte Carlo simulation10.1038/s41524-017-0028-9 ↗
32. Discovering the building blocks of atomic systems using machine learning: application to grain boundaries10.1038/s41524-017-0027-x ↗
33. Identifying domains of applicability of machine learning models for materials science10.1038/s41467-020-17112-9 ↗
34. GBstudio: A Builder Software on Periodic Models of CSL Boundaries for Molecular Simulation10.2320/matertrans.47.2706 ↗
35. Origin of differences in the excess volume of copper and nickel grain boundaries10.1016/j.actamat.2016.02.040 ↗
36. Atomistic Simulation of Tensile Deformation Behavior of ∑5 Tilt Grain Boundaries in Copper Bicrystal10.1038/srep05919 ↗
37. Computer simulation on surfaces and [001]symmetric tilt grain boundaries in Ni, Al, and Ni 3 Al10.1557/JMR.1989.0062 ↗
38. Fast Parallel Algorithms for Short-Range Molecular Dynamics10.1006/jcph.1995.1039 ↗
39. Connecting Oxide Nucleation and Growth to Oxygen Diffusion Energetics on Stepped Cu(011) Surfaces: An Experimental and Theoretical Study10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b08944 ↗
40. Grain boundary complexions10.1016/j.actamat.2013.07.037 ↗
41. The five parameter grain boundary character distribution of polycrystalline silicon10.1007/s10853-014-8195-2 ↗
42. Greene · 2008
43. Self-diffusion and impurity diffusion of fee metals using the five-frequency model and the Embedded Atom Method10.1557/JMR.1989.0102 ↗
44. On fitting a gold embedded atom method potential using the force matching method10.1063/1.2124667 ↗
45. Interatomic potentials for monoatomic metals from experimental data and ab initio calculations10.1103/PhysRevB.59.3393 ↗
46. Structural stability and lattice defects in copper: Ab initio, tight-binding, and embedded-atom calculations10.1103/PhysRevB.63.224106 ↗
47. Considerations for choosing and using force fields and interatomic potentials in materials science and engineering10.1016/j.cossms.2013.10.001 ↗
48. Ripley · 2007
49. D.M. Powers, Evaluation: from precision, recall and F-measure to ROC, informedness, markedness and correlation, (2011).
50. 2013
51. Absolute interfacial energies of [001]tilt and twist grain boundaries in copper10.1016/0001-6160(59)90198-1 ↗
52. Grain-boundary sliding in nanocrystalline fcc metals10.1103/PhysRevB.64.224105 ↗