A linear finite element model to predict processing-induced distortion in FRP laminates
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Manufacturing processes for laminated composites often produce parts whose dimensions do not match the mold from which they were made. This distortion is commonly referred to as ‘spring-in’. The amount of spring-in can depend on many factors including the manufacturing process (cure temperature, resin bleed, and applied pressure), the part (geometry, material, thickness, cure shrinkage, thermal expansion and layup sequence), and the tool (surface, thickness and thermal expansion). Much of the current work devoted to spring-in relies on extensive resin characterization. While this approach has been reasonably successful, it does little to assist the designer using material systems that have not been fully characterized (which is not always possible or feasible). This study considers the ability of a linear elastic finite element model to describe and quantify many of the factors contributing to spring-in. The aim of this study is to show that spring-in can be accurately predicted without a complete resin characterization. Numerical predictions based on relatively simple mechanical tests were observed to compare favorably with experimental measurements. Spring-in was dominated by thickness shrinkage, which contributed approximately 3/4 of the measured distortion. The mold stretching contribution diminished with thickness and was negligible for parts thicker than 2.5 mm (0.1 in.). While the material system at hand did not exhibit a fiber volume fraction gradient, its effects were included in the formulation of the model. For materials that have reported a gradient, it was found to account for approximately 10% of the part spring-in.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Epoxy Resin Curing Processes · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Composite Material Mechanics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (23)
Show source-provided references
1. Darrow Jr, DA. Qualitative study of mechanisms contributing to spring-in of polymer matrix composite parts, Master's thesis. Washington State University; May 2001.
2. Isolating components of processing induced warpage in laminated composites10.1177/0021998302036021784 ↗
3. Bapanapalli SK. Separating and quantifying the mechanisms contributing to spring-in in FRP composite laminates using a simplified FE model, Master's thesis, Washington State University; August 2003.
4. Cure shrinkage induced warpage in flat uni-axial composites10.1520/CTR10381J ↗
5. Volume fraction gradient induced warpage in curved composite plates10.1016/0961-9526(95)00033-J ↗
6. Warping in advanced composite tools with varying angles and radii, short communication10.1016/S1359-835X(97)00045-6 ↗
7. Curvature predictions of flat advanced composite tools based on measured volume fraction gradient
8. Influence of processing on quality of advanced composite tools
9. Stresses and deformations induced during manufacturing. Part II: a study of the spring-in phenomenon
10. Spring-in study of the aileron rib manufactured from advanced thermoplastic composite10.1016/S1359-835X(97)00085-7 ↗
11. Separating sources of manufacturing distortion in laminated composites10.1177/073168440001900802 ↗
12. A route to shape correct/shape stable laminates
13. An experimental investigation on mechanisms for manufacturing induced shape distortion in homogeneous and balanced laminates10.1016/S1359-835X(00)00173-1 ↗
14. Predictction of shape distortions part I. FE-implementation of a path dependent constitutive model10.1016/j.compositesa.2004.02.006 ↗
15. Prediction of shape distortions part II. Experimental validation and analysis of boundary conditions10.1016/j.compositesa.2004.02.006 ↗
16. Prediction of processing-induced distortion of curved flanged composite laminates10.1016/S0263-8223(02)00070-3 ↗
17. Spring-in and warpage of angled composite laminates10.1016/S0266-3538(02)00105-7 ↗
18. Experimental and numerical study of the effect of cure cycle, tool surface, geometry, and lay-up on the dimensional fidelity of autoclave-processed composite parts10.1016/S1359-835X(01)00123-3 ↗
19. Finite element based prediction of process-induced deformation of autoclaved composite structures using 2D process analysis and 3D structural analysis10.1016/S0263-8223(03)00117-X ↗
20. An experimental method for quantifying tool–part shear interaction during composites processing10.1016/S0266-3538(03)00172-6 ↗
21. Tool–part interaction in composites processing. Part I: experimental investigation and analytical model10.1016/S1359-835X(03)00131-3 ↗
22. Tool–part interaction in composites processing. Part II: numerical modeling10.1016/S1359-835X(03)00132-5 ↗
23. Gibson · 1994