journal article·2022-07Open access

Toughening adhesive joints through crack path engineering using integrated polyamide wires

Ran Tao, Xiaole Li, Arief Yudhanto, Marco Alfano, Gilles Lubineau

Abstract

Ensuring the progressivity of failure of adhesively-bonded composite joints is necessary to guarantee safety and to optimize maintenance operations. In our previous work, we proposed a novel surface patterning strategy to stop crack propagation by triggering bridging of adhesive ligaments. However, the brittle failure of classical bridging ligaments still releases a large amount of stored elastic energy, leading to a snap-slip crack propagation or even catastrophic sudden fracture of bonded joints. Such technology could be further improved by integrating ductile structures within the adhesive layer, but the detailed failure mechanisms require systematic investigation. In this work, we integrated thermoplastic polyamide structures within the epoxy adhesive layer of double cantilever beams to guide this transition from brittle failure to a stable softening behavior. Weak polyamide/epoxy adhesion and their embedded area fractions were critical since they affected the damage mechanisms and determined energy dissipation within bonded joints. ; Supported by funding from King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST) Office of Sponsored Research (OSR) under award number OSR-2017-CRG6-3388.01
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Adhesion, Friction, and Surface Interactions

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (34)

Show source-provided references
1. Bonding of CFRP primary aerospace structures, a discussion of the certification boundary conditions and related technology fields addressing the needs for development10.1080/09276440.2015.1077048 ↗
2. Study of the behaviour of adhesive joints of steel with CFRP for its application in bus structures10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.07.018 ↗
3. Peel ply surface treatment for composite assemblies: Chemistry and morphology effects10.1016/j.compositesa.2005.02.012 ↗
4. The influence of surface treatment on the tensile properties of carbon fiber-reinforced epoxy composites-bonded joints10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.12.095 ↗
5. Chemical functionalization of composite surfaces for improved structural bonded repairs10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.10.020 ↗
6. New approach to surface preparation for adhesive bonding of aeronautical composites: Atmospheric pressure plasma. Studies on the pretreatment lifetime and durability of the bondline
7. Laser-based surface patterning of composite plates for improved secondary adhesive bonding10.1016/j.compositesa.2018.02.041 ↗
8. In situ analysis of interfacial damage in adhesively bonded composite joints subjected to various surface pretreatments10.1016/j.compositesa.2018.10.033 ↗
9. Crack stopping in composite adhesively bonded joints through corrugation10.1016/j.tafmec.2015.10.003 ↗
10. Damage characteristics in 3D stitched composites with various stitch parameters under in-plane tension10.1016/j.compositesa.2014.12.012 ↗
11. Mode I delamination fatigue resistance of unidirectional and quasi-isotropic composite laminates reinforced with rectangular z-pins10.1016/j.compositesa.2018.10.013 ↗
12. A hybrid bondline concept for bonded composite joints10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2016.03.025 ↗
13. Minakuchi S. Fiber-reinforcement-based crack arrester for composite bonded joints. In: 20th ICCM. 2015.
14. Toughening strategies in adhesive joints10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2018.08.028 ↗
15. How variability in interfacial properties results in tougher bonded composite joints by triggering bridging10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2019.11.021 ↗
16. How the spatial correlation in adhesion properties influences the performance of secondary bonding of laminated composites10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2020.04.012 ↗
17. Laser-based interfacial patterning enables toughening of CFRP/epoxy joints through bridging of adhesive ligaments10.1016/j.compositesa.2020.106094 ↗
18. A model for patterned interfaces debonding–Application to adhesion tests10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2015.08.006 ↗
19. Snap-back instability of double cantilever beam with bridging10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2021.111150 ↗
20. Toughening of epoxy resin: The effect of water jet milling on worn tire rubber particles10.3390/polym11030529 ↗
21. Toughening epoxies with halloysite nanotubes10.1016/j.polymer.2008.09.027 ↗
22. Effect of functionalized nano-SiO2 addition on bond behavior of adhesively bonded CFRP-steel double-lap joint10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118400 ↗
23. Nanofillers modification of epocast 50-A1/946 epoxy for bonded joints10.1016/j.cja.2014.08.007 ↗
24. Fatigue and reliability analysis of nano-modified scarf adhesive joints in carbon fiber composites10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.04.001 ↗
25. Mechanical performance of adhesive joints using high-performance nanocomposite adhesive material with carbon nanotube and triblock copolymer hybrids10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.107813 ↗
26. On the fracture behaviour of CFRP bonded joints under mode I loading: Effect of supporting carrier and interface contamination10.1016/j.compscitech.2018.03.024 ↗
27. Can confined mechanical metamaterials replace adhesives?10.1016/j.eml.2021.101411 ↗
28. Enhancement of fracture toughness in secondary bonded CFRP using hybrid thermoplastic/thermoset bondline architecture10.1016/j.compscitech.2020.108346 ↗
29. On controlling interfacial heterogeneity to trigger bridging in secondary bonded composite joints: An efficient strategy to introduce crack-arrest features
30. Improving mode II fracture toughness of secondary bonded joints using laser patterning of adherends10.1016/j.compositesa.2020.105892 ↗
31. Standard test method for mode I interlaminar fracture toughness of unidirectional fiber-reinforced polymer matrix composites. ASTM Internat.; 2014.
32. Cohesive-length scales for damage and toughening mechanisms10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2014.06.010 ↗
33. Single lap joints numerical modelling and comparison with experimental testing10.24840/2183-6493_002.001_0002 ↗
34. Embedded flaws for crack path control in composite laminates10.1016/j.compositesa.2014.08.012 ↗