Cytocompatible, thermostable hydrogel with utility to release drug over skin
Source abstract
Abstract
Hydrogel has wide applicability in biomedical applications and other industrial applications due to its strong biocompatibility. A natural polymer is eco-friendly, nontoxic, and biocompatible. There are vast varieties of natural polymers whose combination can form excellent hydrogels. Pectin and carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) are some such kinds of polymers. Plasticizer has wide applicability to enhance properties of polymers mix. Glycerol has been widely used as a plasticizer in many hydrogels but it does not render thermostability whereas, PEG is known to render thermostability. Thermostable hydrogel provides easy sterilization by using heat and pressure such as an autoclave. Small molecular size plasticizer is known to provide more space among the polymer mix and affect the porosity and water uptake capability. PEG 400 has wide applications in pharmaceutical industries and it is one of the small molecular size plasticizers. Other than this, copper ions are known to render skin regenerative property with biocidal property help in the wound healing treatment. Thus, a hydrogel was fabricated using pectin and CMC with PEG 400 as the plasticizer and copper ion as cross-linker (PCPEG2). The resulted hydrogel not only showed high thermal stability but also has high porosity, a high degree of swelling, pH sensitivity and good cytocompatibility and good drug release efficiency. The hydrogel was characterized by using FTIR, XRD, DSC, TGA/DTG/DTA, and XPS which showed good fabrication of hydrogel with high thermal stability. Thus, a novel hydrogel of pectin/CMC with PEG 400 was fabricated with enhancing properties applicable in biomedical applications and other industrial applications.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Hydrogels: synthesis, properties, applications · 3D Printing in Biomedical Research · Advancements in Transdermal Drug Delivery
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (59)
Show source-provided references
1. Guilherme MR, Aouada FA, Fajardo AR, Martins AF, Paulino AT, Davi MFT, Rubira AF, Muniz EC (2015) Superabsorbent hydrogels based on polysaccharides for application in agriculture as soil conditioner and nutrient carrier: a review. Eur Polym J 72:365–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2015.04.01710.1016/j.eurpolymj.2015.04.017 ↗
2. Rudzinski WE, Dave AM, Vaishnav UH, Kumbar SG, Kulkarni AR, Aminabhavi TM (2002) Hydrogels as controlled release devices in agriculture. Des Monomers Polym 5(1):39–65. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685550276015158010.1163/156855502760151580 ↗
3. Hoffman AS (2012) Hydrogels for biomedical applications. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 64:18–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2012.09.01010.1016/j.addr.2012.09.010 ↗
4. Gad YH (2008) Preparation and characterization of poly(2-acrylamido-2-methylpropane-sulfonic acid)/Chitosan hydrogel using gamma irradiation and its application in wastewater treatment. Radiat Phys Chem 77(9):1101–1107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2008.05.00210.1016/j.radphyschem.2008.05.002 ↗
5. Crini G (2005) Recent developments in polysaccharide-based materials used as adsorbents in wastewater treatment. Prog Polym Sci 30(1):38–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2004.11.00210.1016/j.progpolymsci.2004.11.002 ↗
6. Lutchmiah K, Verliefde ARD, Roest K, Rietveld LC, Cornelissen ER (2014) Forward osmosis for application in wastewater treatment: a review. Water Res 58:179–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2014.03.04510.1016/j.watres.2014.03.045 ↗
7. Souza GR, Molina JR, Raphael RM, Ozawa MG, Stark DJ, Levin CS, Bronk LF, Ananta JS, Mandelin J, Georgescu M-M, Bankson JA, Gelovani JG, Killian TC, Arap W, Pasqualini R (2010) Three-dimensional tissue culture based on magnetic cell levitation. Nat Nanotech 5:291. https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2010.2310.1038/nnano.2010.23 ↗
8. Landers R, Hübner U, Schmelzeisen R, Mülhaupt R (2002) Rapid prototyping of scaffolds derived from thermoreversible hydrogels and tailored for applications in tissue engineering. Biomaterials 23(23):4437–4447. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(02)00139-410.1016/S0142-9612(02)00139-4 ↗
9. Seliktar D (2012) Designing cell-compatible hydrogels for biomedical applications. Science 336(6085):1124–1128. 10.1126/science.1214804 %J Science10.1126/science.1214804 ↗
10. Drury JL, Mooney DJ (2003) Hydrogels for tissue engineering: scaffold design variables and applications. Biomaterials 24(24):4337–4351. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00340-510.1016/S0142-9612(03)00340-5 ↗
11. Lee KY, Mooney DJ (2001) Hydrogels for tissue engineering. Chem Rev 101(7):1869–1880. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr000108x10.1021/cr000108x ↗
12. Peppas NA, Bures P, Leobandung W, Ichikawa H (2000) Hydrogels in pharmaceutical formulations. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 50(1):27–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0939-6411(00)00090-410.1016/S0939-6411(00)00090-4 ↗
13. Van Tomme SR, Storm G, Hennink WE (2008) In situ gelling hydrogels for pharmaceutical and biomedical applications. Int J Pharm 355(1):1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2008.01.05710.1016/j.ijpharm.2008.01.057 ↗
14. Gupta P, Vermani K, Garg S (2002) Hydrogels: from controlled release to pH-responsive drug delivery. Drug Discov Today 7(10):569–579. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-6446(02)02255-910.1016/S1359-6446(02)02255-9 ↗
15. Malafaya PB, Silva GA, Reis RL (2007) Natural–origin polymers as carriers and scaffolds for biomolecules and cell delivery in tissue engineering applications. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 59(4):207–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2007.03.01210.1016/j.addr.2007.03.012 ↗
16. Vieira MGA, da Silva MA, dos Santos LO, Beppu MM (2011) Natural-based plasticizers and biopolymer films: a review. Eur Polym J 47(3):254–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2010.12.01110.1016/j.eurpolymj.2010.12.011 ↗
17. Ninan N, Muthiah M, Park I-K, Elain A, Thomas S, Grohens Y (2013) Pectin/carboxymethyl cellulose/microfibrillated cellulose composite scaffolds for tissue engineering. Carbohydr Polym 98(1):877–885. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.06.06710.1016/j.carbpol.2013.06.067 ↗
18. Nazarov R, Jin H-J, Kaplan DL (2004) Porous 3-D scaffolds from regenerated silk fibroin. Biomacromolecules 5(3):718–726. https://doi.org/10.1021/bm034327e10.1021/bm034327e ↗
19. Chung TW, Yang J, Akaike T, Cho KY, Nah JW, Kim SI, Cho CS (2002) Preparation of alginate/galactosylated chitosan scaffold for hepatocyte attachment. Biomaterials 23(14):2827–2834. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(01)00399-410.1016/S0142-9612(01)00399-4 ↗
20. Sheridan MH, Shea LD, Peters MC, Mooney DJ (2000) Bioabsorbable polymer scaffolds for tissue engineering capable of sustained growth factor delivery. J Control Release 64(1):91–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-3659(99)00138-810.1016/S0168-3659(99)00138-8 ↗
21. Luu YK, Kim K, Hsiao BS, Chu B, Hadjiargyrou M (2003) Development of a nanostructured DNA delivery scaffold via electrospinning of PLGA and PLA–PEG block copolymers. J Control Release 89(2):341–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-3659(03)00097-X10.1016/S0168-3659(03)00097-X ↗
22. Agrawal CM, Ray RB (2001) Biodegradable polymeric scaffolds for musculoskeletal tissue engineering. J Biomed Mater Res 55 (2):141–150. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-4636(200105)55:2<141::AID-JBM1000>3.0.CO;2-J10.1002/1097-4636(200105)55:2<141::AID-JBM1000>3.0.CO;2-J ↗
23. Mao JS, Zhao LG, Yin YJ, Yao KD (2003) Structure and properties of bilayer chitosan–gelatin scaffolds. Biomaterials 24(6):1067–1074. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(02)00442-810.1016/S0142-9612(02)00442-8 ↗
24. Xiao W, He J, Nichol JW, Wang L, Hutson CB, Wang B, Du Y, Fan H, Khademhosseini A (2011) Synthesis and characterization of photocrosslinkable gelatin and silk fibroin interpenetrating polymer network hydrogels. Acta Biomater 7(6):2384–2393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2011.01.01610.1016/j.actbio.2011.01.016 ↗
25. Chen M-C, Tsai H-W, Liu C-T, Peng S-F, Lai W-Y, Chen S-J, Chang Y, Sung H-W (2009) A nanoscale drug-entrapment strategy for hydrogel-based systems for the delivery of poorly soluble drugs. Biomaterials 30(11):2102–2111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.12.04710.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.12.047 ↗
26. Bhattarai N, Gunn J, Zhang M (2010) Chitosan-based hydrogels for controlled, localized drug delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 62(1):83–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2009.07.01910.1016/j.addr.2009.07.019 ↗
27. He H, Cao X, Lee LJ (2004) Design of a novel hydrogel-based intelligent system for controlled drug release. J Control Release 95(3):391–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2003.12.00410.1016/j.jconrel.2003.12.004 ↗
28. Soppimath KS, Kulkarni AR, Aminabhavi TM (2000) Controlled release of antihypertensive drug from the interpenetrating network poly(vinyl alcohol)–guar gum hydrogel microspheres. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 11(1):27–43. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685620074347210.1163/156856200743472 ↗
29. Williams CG, Malik AN, Kim TK, Manson PN, Elisseeff JH (2005) Variable cytocompatibility of six cell lines with photoinitiators used for polymerizing hydrogels and cell encapsulation. Biomaterials 26(11):1211–1218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.04.02410.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.04.024 ↗
30. Mann BK, Gobin AS, Tsai AT, Schmedlen RH, West JL (2001) Smooth muscle cell growth in photopolymerized hydrogels with cell adhesive and proteolytically degradable domains: synthetic ECM analogs for tissue engineering. Biomaterials 22(22):3045–3051. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(01)00051-510.1016/S0142-9612(01)00051-5 ↗
31. Kobayashi H, Ikacia Y (1991) Corneal cell adhesion and proliferation on hydrogel sheets bound with cell-adhesive proteins. Curr Eye Res 10(10):899–908. https://doi.org/10.3109/0271368910902032510.3109/02713689109020325 ↗
32. Banerjee A, Arha M, Choudhary S, Ashton RS, Bhatia SR, Schaffer DV, Kane RS (2009) The influence of hydrogel modulus on the proliferation and differentiation of encapsulated neural stem cells. Biomaterials 30(27):4695–4699. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.05.05010.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.05.050 ↗
33. Basak S, Nandi N, Paul S, Hamley IW, Banerjee A (2017) A tripeptide-based self-shrinking hydrogel for waste-water treatment: removal of toxic organic dyes and lead (Pb2+) ions. Chem Commun 53(43):5910–5913. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7CC01774J10.1039/C7CC01774J ↗
34. Ninan N, Muthiah M, Park I-K, Kalarikkal N, Elain A, Wui Wong T, Thomas S, Grohens Y (2014) Wound healing analysis of pectin/carboxymethyl cellulose/microfibrillated cellulose based composite scaffolds. Mater Lett 132:34–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2014.06.05610.1016/j.matlet.2014.06.056 ↗
35. Akalin GO, Pulat M (2018) Preparation and characterization of nanoporous sodium carboxymethyl cellulose hydrogel beads. J Nanomater 2018:12. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/967694910.1155/2018/9676949 ↗
36. Borkow G (2014) Using copper to improve the well-being of the skin. Curr Chem Biol 8(2):89–102. https://doi.org/10.2174/221279680966615022722385710.2174/2212796809666150227223857 ↗
37. Sothornvit R, Krochta JM (2001) Plasticizer effect on mechanical properties of β-lactoglobulin films. J Food Eng 50(3):149–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0260-8774(00)00237-510.1016/S0260-8774(00)00237-5 ↗
38. Baiardo M, Frisoni G, Scandola M, Rimelen M, Lips D, Ruffieux K, Wintermantel E (2003) Thermal and mechanical properties of plasticized poly(L-lactic acid). J Appl Polym Sci 90(7):1731–1738. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.1254910.1002/app.12549 ↗
39. Srinivasa PC, MNR, Tharanathan RN (2007) Effect of plasticizers and fatty acids on mechanical and permeability characteristics of chitosan films. Food Hydrocoll 21(7):1113–1122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2006.08.00510.1016/j.foodhyd.2006.08.005 ↗
40. Péan J-M, Boury F, Venier-Julienne M-C, Menei P, Proust J-E, Benoit J-PJPR (1999) Why does PEG 400 co-encapsulation improve NGF stability and release from PLGA biodegradable microspheres? Pharm Res 16(8):1294–1299. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:101481811822410.1023/a:1014818118224 ↗
41. D’souza AA, Shegokar R (2016) Polyethylene glycol (PEG): a versatile polymer for pharmaceutical applications. Expert Opin Drug Deliv 13(9):1257–1275. https://doi.org/10.1080/17425247.2016.118248510.1080/17425247.2016.1182485 ↗
42. Charles PT, Stubbs VR, Soto CM, Martin BD, White BJ, Taitt CR (2009) Reduction of non-specific protein adsorption using poly(ethylene) glycol (PEG) modified polyacrylate hydrogels in immunoassays for Staphylococcal enterotoxin B detection. Sensors 9(1):645–655. https://doi.org/10.3390/s9010064510.3390/s90100645 ↗
43. Chiu YC, Larson JC, Isom Jr. A, Brey EM (2010) Generation of porous poly(ethylene glycol) hydrogels by salt leaching. Tissue Eng Part C Methods 16(5):905–912. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.TEC.2009.064610.1089/ten.TEC.2009.0646 ↗
44. Strzelczyk AK, Wang H, Lindhorst A, Waschke J, Pompe T, Kropf C, Luneau B, Schmidt S (2017) Hydrogel microparticles as sensors for specific adhesion: case studies on antibody detection and soil release polymers. Gels 3(3):3110.3390/gels3030031 ↗
45. Sadeghi MJAJBAS (2011) Synthesis and investigation of swelling behavior natural based superabsorbent composites with high thermal resistance. Aust J Basic Appl Sci 5:887–895
46. Liu Y, Peterson DA, Kimura H, Schubert D (1997) Mechanism of cellular 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) reduction. J Neurochem 69(2):581–593. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1471-4159.1997.69020581.x10.1046/j.1471-4159.1997.69020581.x ↗
47. Mishra RK, Datt M, Banthia AK (2008) Synthesis and characterization of pectin/PVP hydrogel membranes for drug delivery system. AAPS Pharm Sci Tech 9(2):395–403. https://doi.org/10.1208/s12249-008-9048-610.1208/s12249-008-9048-6 ↗
48. COLDEA TE, SOCACIU C, FETEA F, RANGA Fa, POP RM, FLOREA M (2013) Rapid quantitative analysis of ethanol and prediction of methanol content in traditional fruit brandies from romania, using FTIR spectroscopy and chemometrics NOT BOT HORTI AGROBO 41(1):7. https://doi.org/10.15835/nbha411900010.15835/nbha4119000 ↗
49. Yang J, Duan J, Zhang L, Lindman B, Edlund H, Norgren MJC (2016) Spherical nanocomposite particles prepared from mixed cellulose–chitosan solutions. Cellulose 23(5):3105–3115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-016-1029-410.1007/s10570-016-1029-4 ↗
50. Luna-Martínez JF, Hernández-Uresti DB, Reyes-Melo ME, Guerrero-Salazar CA, González-González VA, Sepúlveda-Guzmán S (2011) Synthesis and optical characterization of ZnS–sodium carboxymethyl cellulose nanocomposite films. Carbohydr Polym 84(1):566–570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.12.02110.1016/j.carbpol.2010.12.021 ↗
51. Munajad A, Subroto C, Suwarno SJE (2018) Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy analysis of transformer paper in mineral oil-paper composite insulation under accelerated thermal aging. Energies 11(2):36410.3390/en11020364 ↗
52. Bandara K, Ekanayake C, Saha TK, Annamalai PKJIToD, Insulation E (2016) Understanding the ageing aspects of natural ester based insulation liquid in power transformer. IEEE T Dielect El In 23(1):246–25710.1109/TDEI.2015.004744 ↗
53. Bhattacharya R, Phaniraj TN, Shailaja D (2003) Polysulfone and polyvinyl pyrrolidone blend membranes with reverse phase morphology as controlled release systems: experimental and theoretical studies. J Memb Sci 227(1):23–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2003.07.01410.1016/j.memsci.2003.07.014 ↗
54. Saravana S, Bheemaneni G, Kandaswamy R (2018) Effect of polyethylene glycol on mechanical, thermal, and morphological properties of talc reinforced polylactic acid composites. Mater Today Proc 5(1):1591–1598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2017.11.25110.1016/j.matpr.2017.11.251 ↗
55. Malik NS, Ahmad M, Minhas MU (2017) Cross-linked beta-cyclodextrin and carboxymethyl cellulose hydrogels for controlled drug delivery of acyclovir. PloS one 12(2):e0172727. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.017272710.1371/journal.pone.0172727 ↗
56. Namdeo R Jadhav, VLG, Karthik J Nair, Hanmantrao M Kadam (2009) Glass transition temperature: basics and application in pharmaceutical sector. Asian J Pharm 3(2)10.4103/0973-8398.55043 ↗
57. Palermo PJ (2001) 6 Solid Dosage-Form Analysis. In: Ahuja S, Scypinski S (eds.) Separation science and technology, vol 3. Academic Press, pp 235–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-6395(01)80008-810.1016/S0149-6395(01)80008-8 ↗
58. Sadeghi M (2011) Synthesis, and investigation of swelling behavior natural based superabsorbent composites with high thermal resistance Aust J Basic Appl Sci i 5(11):887–895
59. Lang F, Hoffmann EK (2012) Role of ion transport in control of apoptotic cell death. Compr Physiol 2(3):2037–2061. https://doi.org/10.1002/cphy.c11004610.1002/cphy.c110046 ↗