Sol–gel-derived mineral scaffolds within SiO2–P2O5–CaO–MgO–ZnO–CaF2 system
Source abstract
Abstract
Ceramic scaffolds were prepared starting from a sol–gel powder, which was mixed with glucose as a pore-generating substance and subsequently thermally treated at different temperatures and for different periods in order to ensure the formation of a resistance structure. The final materials were characterized in terms of structure, morphology, and biological properties by employing X-ray diffraction, scanning electron microscopy coupled with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy, immersion in simulated body fluid, and specific cellular tests on mesenchymal stem cells (optical microscopy, MTT, and GSH assays). The results showed the occurrence of akermanite as the main crystalline phase in all scaffolds. The porosity and compression strength of these 3D architectures can be adjusted through the thermal treatment parameters. Moreover, the biological evaluation indicated an excellent bioactivity and a good biocompatibility at short term for all samples.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties · Aerogels and thermal insulation
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (35)
Show source-provided references
1. Palmero P, Cambier F, De Barra E (2017) Advances in ceramic biomaterials: materials, devices and challenges. Woodhead Publishing, Duxford
2. Li B, Webster T (2017) Orthopedic biomaterials: advances and applications. Springer10.1007/978-3-319-73664-8 ↗
3. Parthasarathy J (2014) 3D modeling, custom implants and its future perspectives in craniofacial surgery. Ann Maxillofac Surg. 4:9–1810.4103/2231-0746.133065 ↗
4. Simonis P, Dufour T, Tenenbaum H (2010) Long-term implant survival and success: a 10-16-year follow-up of non-submerged dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 21:772–77710.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01912.x ↗
5. Chen Q, Thouas GA (2015) Metallic implant biomaterials. Mater Sci Eng R. 87:1–5710.1016/j.mser.2014.10.001 ↗
6. Choi HW, Park YS, Chung SH, Jung MH, Moon W, Rhee SH (2017) Comparison of mechanical and biological properties of zirconia and titanium alloy orthodontic micro-implants. Korean J Orthod. 47:229–23710.4041/kjod.2017.47.4.229 ↗
7. Ohtsuki C, Kamitakahara M, Miyazaki T (2009) Bioactive ceramic-based materials with designed reactivity for bone tissue regeneration J R Soc Interface 6:S349–36010.1098/rsif.2008.0419.focus ↗
8. Xiong K, Shi H, Liu J, Shen Z, Li H, Ye J (2013) Control of the dissolution of Ca and Si ions from CaSiO3 bioceramic via tailoring its surface structure and chemical composition. J Am Ceram Soc. 96:691–69610.1111/jace.12168 ↗
9. Vlasea M, Pilliar R, Toyserkani E (2015) Control of structural and mechanical properties in bioceramic bone substitutes via additive manufacturing layer stacking orientation. Addit Manuf. 6:30–3810.1016/j.addma.2015.03.001 ↗
10. Guo WG, Qiu ZY, Cui H, Wang CM, Zhang XJ, Lee IS, Dong YQ, Cui FZ (2013) Strength and fatigue properties of three-step sintered dense nanocrystal hydroxyapatite bioceramics. Front Mater Sci. 7:190–19510.1007/s11706-013-0205-9 ↗
11. Owens GJ, Singh RK, Foroutan F, Alqaysi M, Han CM, Mahapatra C, Kim HW, Knowles JC (2016) Sol-gel based materials for biomedical applications. Prog Mater Sci. 77:1–7910.1016/j.pmatsci.2015.12.001 ↗
12. Lkhagvajav N, Yasa I, Celik E, Koizhaiganova M, Sari O (2011) Antimicrobial activity of colloidal silver nanoparticles prepared by sol-gel method. Dig J Nanomater Biostruct. 6:149–154
13. Oprea O, Ghitulica CD, Voicu G, Vasile BS, Oprea A (2013) Synthesis and photocatalytic properties of Fe(III)-doped TiO2 prepared by sol-gel method. Rom J Mater. 43:408–413
14. Busuioc AD, Enuta R, Stoleriu S, Oprea O, Visan T (2017) SnO2 powders doped with La3+ or V5+. Rom J Mater. 47:293–297
15. Constantin CP, Slatineanu T, Palamaru M, Iordan A, Caltun OF (2012) CoxZnx-1Fe2O4 Nanoparticles ferrite series as magnetic resonance imaging contrast agents. Dig J Nanomater Biostruct. 7:1793–1798
16. Voicu G, Ene VL, Sava DF, Surdu VA, Busuioc C (2016) Sol-gel derived vitroceramic materials for biomedical applications. J Non-Cryst Solids 449:75–8210.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2016.07.021 ↗
17. Laczka M, Cholewa-Kowalska K, Osyczka AM (2016) Bioactivity and osteoinductivity of glasses and glassceramics and their material determinants. Ceram Int. 42:14313–1432510.1016/j.ceramint.2016.06.077 ↗
18. Raucci MG, Demitri C, Soriente A, Fasolino I, Sannino A, Ambrosio L (2018) Gelatin/nano-hydroxyapatite hydrogel scaffold prepared by sol-gel technology as filler to repair bone defects. J Biomed Mater Res A 106:2007–201910.1002/jbm.a.36395 ↗
19. Fathi MH, Doost Mohammadi A (2008) Preparation and characterization of sol-gel bioactive glass coating for improvement of biocompatibility of human body implant. Mater Sci Eng A 474:128–13310.1016/j.msea.2007.05.041 ↗
20. Almeida RM, Gama A, Vueva Y (2011) Bioactive sol-gel scaffolds with dual porosity for tissue engineering. J Sol-Gel Sci Technol. 57:336–34210.1007/s10971-009-2134-8 ↗
21. Baino F, Novajra G, Vitale-Brovarone C (2015) Bioceramics and scaffolds: a winning combination for tissue engineering. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 3:20210.3389/fbioe.2015.00202 ↗
22. Gao C, Deng Y, Feng P, Mao Z, Li P, Yang B, Deng J, Cao Y, Shuai C, Peng S (2014) Current progress in bioactive ceramic scaffolds for bone repair and regeneration. Int J Mol Sci. 15:4714–473210.3390/ijms15034714 ↗
23. Busuioc C, Voicu G, Zuzu ID, Miu D, Sima C, Iordache F, Jinga SI (2017) Vitroceramic coatings deposited by laser ablation on Ti-Zr substrates for implantable medical applications with improved biocompatibility. Ceram Int. 43:5498–550410.1016/j.ceramint.2017.01.070 ↗
24. Wang X, Li X, Ito A, Sogo Y (2011) Synthesis and characterization of hierarchically macroporous and mesoporous CaO–MO–SiO2–P2O5 (M=Mg, Zn, Sr) bioactive glass scaffolds. Acta Biomater. 7:3638–364410.1016/j.actbio.2011.06.029 ↗
25. Vitale-Brovarone C, Baino F, Verne E (2009) High strength bioactive glass-ceramic scaffolds for bone regeneration. J Mater Sci. 20:643–653
26. Yin P, Yuan JW, Liu LH, Xiao T, Lei T (2017) Effect of ZrO2 on the bioactivity properties of gel-derived CaO–P2O5–SiO2–SrO glasses. Ceram Int. 43:9691–969810.1016/j.ceramint.2017.04.143 ↗
27. Kokubo T, Kushitani H, Sakka S, Kitsugi T, Yamamuro T (1990) Solutions able to reproduce in vivo surface-structure changes in bioactive glass-ceramic A-W. J Biomed Mater Res. 24:721–73410.1002/jbm.820240607 ↗
28. Vybrant MTT Cell Proliferation Assay Kit (V13154) (2002) Molecular Probes
29. GSH-Glo Glutathione Assay (V6911 and V6912) (2015) Promega Corporation
30. Mihailova IK, Radev L, Aleksandrova VA (2015) Colova IV, Salvado IMM, Fernandes M.H.V. Novel merwinite/akermanite ceramics: in vitro bioactivity. Bulg Chem Commun. 47:253–260
31. Kansal I, Goel A, Tulyaganov DU, Rajagopal RR, Ferreira JMF (2012) Structural and thermal characterization of CaO–MgO–SiO2–P2O5–CaF2 glasses. J Eur Ceram Soc. 32:2739–274610.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2011.10.041 ↗
32. Zhu Y, Li X, Yang J, Wang S, Gao H, Hanagata N (2011) Composition-structure-property relationships of the CaO–MxOy–SiO2–P2O5 (M=Zr, Mg, Sr) mesoporous bioactive glass (MBG) scaffolds. J Mater Chem. 21:9208–921810.1039/c1jm10838g ↗
33. Huang Y, Jin X, Zhang X, Sun H, Tu J, Tang T, Chang J, Dai K (2009) In vitro and in vivo evaluation of akermanite bioceramics for bone regeneration. Biomaterials 30:5041–504810.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.05.077 ↗
34. Zanetti AS, McCandless GT, Chan JY, Gimble JM, Hayes DJ (2015) Characterization of novel akermanite:poly-ε-caprolactone scaffolds for human adipose-derived stem cells bone tissue engineering. J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 9:389–40410.1002/term.1646 ↗
35. Xia L, Yin Z, Mao L, Wang X, Liu J, Jiang X, Zhang Z, Lin K, Chang J, Fang B (2016) Akermanite bioceramics promote osteogenesis, angiogenesis and suppress osteoclastogenesis for osteoporotic bone regeneration. Sci Rep. 6:2200510.1038/srep22005 ↗