journal article·2009-07

Nano/macroporous monolithic scaffolds prepared by the sol–gel method

Ana C. Marques, Himanshu Jain, Carol Kiely, Kai Song, Christopher J. Kiely, Rui M. Almeida

Publisher page

Abstract

Development of optimal scaffolds for bone tissue engineering and regeneration is still a challenge, since many materials and structures have been proposed but few have reached clinical expectations. This work reports on the preparation and characterization of SiO2-CaO and SiO2-CaO-P2O5 sol–gel derived monoliths, with potential application as glass scaffolds for bone regeneration, exhibiting a nano/macro trimodal pore size distribution, including pores of ~100’s of micrometers (μm), several microns and just a few nanometers (nm) in size. Interconnected macropores (~20–200 μm) have been obtained in the present work by polymerization-induced spinodal phase separation along with the sol–gel transition, when a water soluble polymer [poly(ethylene oxide)] was added to the sol–gel solution; the several-micron pores are spherical and isolated and might be the result of secondary phase separation by nucleation-growth mechanism; the interconnected nanopore (~5–25 nm) structure of the macroporous gel skeleton, on the other hand, was tailored by solvent exchange procedures. The morphological and textural characterization of these materials was performed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), X-ray ultra microscopy (XuM), nitrogen adsorption and mercury intrusion porosimetry. The factors affecting the porosity exhibited by the scaffolds, such as glass composition and solvent exchange conditions, have been assessed.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Mesoporous Materials and Catalysis · Calcium Carbonate Crystallization and Inhibition

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (16)

Show source-provided references
1. Hench LL, Splinter RJ, Allen WC, Greenlee TK Jr (1971) J Biomed Mater Res 2:11710.1002/jbm.820050611 ↗
2. Freyman TM, Yannas IV, Gibson LJ (2001) Progr Mater Sci 46:27310.1016/S0079-6425(00)00018-9 ↗
3. Pereira MM, Hench LL (1996) J Sol-Gel Sci Technol 7:5910.1007/BF00401884 ↗
4. Nakanishi K (1997) J Porous Mater 4:6710.1023/A:1009627216939 ↗
5. Takahashi R, Sato S, Sodesawa T, Goto T, Matsutani K, Mikami N (2005) Mater Res Bull 40:114810.1016/j.materresbull.2005.03.009 ↗
6. Sepulveda P, Jones JR, Hench LL (2002) J Biom Mater Res 59:34010.1002/jbm.1250 ↗
7. Jones JR, Ehrenfried LM, Hench LL (2006) Biomaterials 27:96410.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.07.017 ↗
8. Maekawa H, Esquena J, Bishop S, Solans C, Chmelka BF (2003) Adv Mater 15:59110.1002/adma.200304248 ↗
9. Liang W, Russel C (2006) J Mater Sci 41:378710.1007/s10853-006-2469-2 ↗
10. Lofton CM, Milz CB, Huang H, Sigmund WM (2005) J Eur Ceram Soc 25:88310.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2004.03.026 ↗
11. Li R, Clark AE, Hench LL (1991) J Appl Biomat 2:23110.1002/jab.770020403 ↗
12. Saravanapavan P, Hench LL (2001) J Biomed Mater Res 54:60810.1002/1097-4636(20010315)54:4<608::AID-JBM180>3.0.CO;2-U ↗
13. Brunauer S, Emmet PH, Teller E (1938) J Am Chem Soc 60:30910.1021/ja01269a023 ↗
14. Barrett EP, Joyner LG (1951) J Am Chem Soc 73:37310.1021/ja01145a126 ↗
15. Yan XX, Deng HX, Huang XH, Lu GQ, Qiao SZ, Zhao DY, Yu CZ (2005) J Non-Cryst Solids 351:320910.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2005.08.024 ↗
16. Marques AC, Jain H, Almeida RM (2007) Eur. J Glass Sci Tech Part B-Physics and Chemistry of Glasses 48:65