journal article·2011-01Open access

Hole and notch sensitivity of aluminium replicated foam

E. Combaz, A. Rossoll, A. Mortensen

Acta Materialia· Volume 59· Issue 2

Abstract

The flow and failure behaviour of replicated pure aluminium foams in the presence of holes and notches is explored, varying the pore size and the notch depth or hole radius. Flat dog-bone tensile specimens containing a cylindrical hole, and cylindrical V-notched samples of 400 mu m and 75 mu m pore size microcellular aluminium were tested. Both pore size foams exhibit a notch strengthening effect, i.e. the peak failure stress increases as the depth of notches in cylindrical samples increases. In dog-bone samples, the presence of a hole ranging from 0 to 4 mm in diameter (in a sample 9 mm wide) does not affect the net section peak failure stress of the 75 mu m foam while the 400 mu m pore size foam exhibits a slight increase in net section failure stress as the hole diameter is increased to 2 mm. Plastic flow curves for notched and hole-containing samples are accurately predicted by a finite-element simulation based on the Deshpande-Fleck [Deshpande VS, Fleck NA. J Mech Phys Solids 2000;48:1253-83] flow law, showing that the observed trends in the data are predominantly mechanical in nature, and strongly linked to the presence of stress triaxiality at the centre of the notched samples. (C) 2010 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Cellular and Composite Structures · Pickering emulsions and particle stabilization · Corrosion Behavior and Inhibition

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (53)

Show source-provided references
1. Amsterdam · Acta Mater · 2006 · 54 · 446510.1016/j.actamat.2006.05.033 ↗
2. Andrews · Acta Mater · 1999 · 47 · 292710.1016/S1359-6454(99)00161-5 ↗
3. Babcsan · Mater Werkst · 2003 · 34 · 39110.1002/mawe.200390081 ↗
4. Deshpande · J Mech Phys Solids · 2000 · 48 · 125310.1016/S0022-5096(99)00082-4 ↗
5. Doyoyo · Int J Plasticity · 2003 · 19 · 119510.1016/S0749-6419(02)00017-7 ↗
6. Elmoutaouakkil · Adv Eng Mater · 2002 · 4 · 80310.1002/1527-2648(20021014)4:10<803::AID-ADEM803>3.0.CO;2-D ↗
7. Harte · Acta Mater · 1999 · 47 · 251110.1016/S1359-6454(99)00097-X ↗
8. Miyoshi · Adv Eng Mater · 2000 · 2 · 17910.1002/(SICI)1527-2648(200004)2:4<179::AID-ADEM179>3.0.CO;2-G ↗
9. Motz · Acta Mater · 2001 · 49 · 246310.1016/S1359-6454(01)00152-5 ↗
10. Motz · Acta Mater · 2002 · 50 · 201310.1016/S1359-6454(02)00047-2 ↗
11. Olurin · Int J Fatigue · 2001 · 23 · 37510.1016/S0142-1123(01)00010-X ↗
12. Ramamurty · Acta Mater · 2004 · 52 · 18110.1016/j.actamat.2003.09.004 ↗
13. Ramamurty · Acta Mater · 2004 · 52 · 86910.1016/j.actamat.2003.10.021 ↗
14. McCullough · Acta Mater · 1999 · 47 · 233110.1016/S1359-6454(99)00125-1 ↗
15. McCullough · Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct · 2000 · 23 · 19910.1046/j.1460-2695.2000.00261.x ↗
16. Sridhar · Acta Mater · 2000 · 48 · 334110.1016/S1359-6454(00)00151-8 ↗
17. Amsterdam · Scripta Mater · 2008 · 59 · 65310.1016/j.scriptamat.2008.05.025 ↗
18. Amsterdam · Acta Mater · 2008 · 56 · 60910.1016/j.actamat.2007.10.034 ↗
19. Amsterdam · J Mater Sci · 2005 · 40 · 581310.1007/s10853-005-4995-8 ↗
20. Deshpande · Int J Impact Eng · 2000 · 24 · 27710.1016/S0734-743X(99)00153-0 ↗
21. Andrews · Int J Mech Sci · 2001 · 43 · 70110.1016/S0020-7403(00)00043-6 ↗
22. Onck · MRS Bull · 2003 · 28 · 27910.1557/mrs2003.81 ↗
23. Onck · Int J Mech Sci · 2001 · 43 · 68110.1016/S0020-7403(00)00042-4 ↗
24. Conde · Adv Eng Mater · 2006 · 8 · 79510.1002/adem.200600077 ↗
25. Advanced structural and functional materials design
26. San Marchi · Acta Mater · 2001 · 49 · 395910.1016/S1359-6454(01)00294-4 ↗
27. Andrews · Scripta Mater · 2001 · 44 · 100510.1016/S1359-6462(01)00673-X ↗
28. Andrews · Acta Mater · 2001 · 49 · 297510.1016/S1359-6454(01)00203-8 ↗
29. Andrews · Mater Lett · 2002 · 57 · 53210.1016/S0167-577X(02)00824-8 ↗
30. Antoniou · Acta Mater · 2004 · 52 · 237710.1016/j.actamat.2004.01.028 ↗
31. Chen · J Mech Phys Solids · 2001 · 49 · 23110.1016/S0022-5096(00)00039-9 ↗
32. Olurin · Adv Eng Mater · 2001 · 3 · 5510.1002/1527-2648(200101)3:1/2<55::AID-ADEM55>3.0.CO;2-2 ↗
33. Onck P. In: Metfoam 2003. MIT Verlag; 2003. p. 399–404.
34. Onck P, Bastawros AF. In: Miannay D, Costa P, François D, Pineau A, editors. Euromat 2000, vol. 1; 2000. p. 717–22.
35. Onck · J De Phys IV · 2001 · 11 · 211
36. Paul · Scripta Mater · 1999 · 40 · 80910.1016/S1359-6462(99)00037-8 ↗
37. Sugimura · Acta Mater · 1997 · 45 · 524510.1016/S1359-6454(97)00148-1 ↗
38. McCullough · Acta Mater · 1999 · 47 · 232310.1016/S1359-6454(99)00128-7 ↗
39. Olurin · Mater Sci Eng A · 2000 · 291 · 13610.1016/S0921-5093(00)00954-0 ↗
40. Onck · Int J Mech Sci · 2001 · 43 · 294710.1016/S0020-7403(01)00060-1 ↗
41. Fleck · J Mech Phys Solids · 2001 · 49 · 201510.1016/S0022-5096(01)00033-3 ↗
42. Despois · Adv Eng Mater · 2004 · 6 · 44410.1002/adem.200405155 ↗
43. Despois JF, Marmottant A, Conde Y, Goodall R, Salvo L, San Marchi C, et al. In: Advanced structural and functional materials design, proceedings, 2006. p. 281–88.10.4028/0-87849-996-2.281 ↗
44. Despois · Acta Mater · 2006 · 54 · 412910.1016/j.actamat.2006.03.054 ↗
45. Diologent · Acta Mater · 2009 · 57 · 28610.1016/j.actamat.2008.09.008 ↗
46. San Marchi · Acta Mater · 2004 · 52 · 289510.1016/j.actamat.2004.02.035 ↗
47. Combaz E, Bacciarini C, Charvet R, Dufour W, Mortensen A. Acta Mater submitted for publication.
48. Combaz · Acta Mater · 2010 · 58 · 516810.1016/j.actamat.2010.05.053 ↗
49. Combaz · Acta Mater · 2010 · 58 · 459010.1016/j.actamat.2010.04.025 ↗
50. Marmottant A, Despois JF, Salvo L, Maire E, Bornert M, Mortensen A. Proceeding Metfoam 05.
51. Amsterdam · Mater Sci Eng A · 2008 · 496 · 37610.1016/j.msea.2008.05.036 ↗
52. Goodall · Mater Sci Eng A · 2007 · 465 · 12410.1016/j.msea.2007.02.002 ↗
53. Goodall · Scripta Mater · 2006 · 54 · 206910.1016/j.scriptamat.2006.03.003 ↗