Quantitative TEM analysis of 3-D grain structure in CVD-grown SiC films using double-wedge geometry
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract We have characterized the structure of chemical vapor deposition-grown polycrystalline cubic SiC films by quantitative transmission electron microscopy. A new double-wedge sample geometry allowed accurate statistical measurements of the grain size as a function of distance from the substrate. The data are well described by the van der Drift model of faceted film growth with a 〈1 1 1〉 texture that narrows with distance h from the substrate. It was found that the distribution of grain sizes d ( h ) is self-similar and the mean grain size follows a power law of the type 〈 d 〉 ∝ h ν . However, the measured exponent ν = 0.68 ± 0.1 is significantly larger than that previously predicted from mean field models and computer simulations of three-dimensional film growth ( ν = 0.4). This difference may be due to the polarity of SiC, its low stacking fault energy and abundant defects, or impurities. The accuracy of the experimental observations due to the new sample geometry reported here is sufficient to enable statistical tomography or provide guidelines for improved computer modeling.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Silicon Carbide Semiconductor Technologies · Copper Interconnects and Reliability · Thin-Film Transistor Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. Thompson · Ann Rev Mater Sci · 2000 · 30 · 15910.1146/annurev.matsci.30.1.159 ↗
2. Grovenor · 1989
3. Ohring · 1998
4. Mehregany · Thin Solid Films · 1999 · 355 · 51810.1016/S0257-8972(99)00374-6 ↗
5. Witrouw · Microelect Eng · 2004 · 76 · 24510.1016/j.mee.2004.07.001 ↗
6. Bunshah RF, Handbook of Hard Coatings, Williams Andrew, 2001.
7. Will · J Appl Phys · 1990 · 68 · 97310.1063/1.346663 ↗
8. Wild · Diamond Rel Mater · 1993 · 2 · 15810.1016/0925-9635(93)90047-6 ↗
9. Seo · J Vac Sci Technol A · 1997 · 15 · 222610.1116/1.580538 ↗
10. von Kaenel · Phys Stat Sol A · 1996 · 154 · 21910.1002/pssa.2211540117 ↗
11. Russell · Adv Mater Opt Electr · 1997 · 7 · 19510.1002/(SICI)1099-0712(199707)7:4<195::AID-AMO306>3.0.CO;2-4 ↗
12. Krausslich · J Phys D – Appl Phys · 1995 · 28 · 75910.1088/0022-3727/28/4/020 ↗
13. Boo · J Vac Sci Technol B · 2003 · 21 · 187010.1116/1.1585073 ↗
14. Radmilovic · Diamond Relat Mater · 2006 · 182 · 63
15. Dammers · Textures Microstruct · 1991 · 757 · 14
16. Thijssen · Phys Rev B · 1992 · 45 · 865010.1103/PhysRevB.45.8650 ↗
17. Thijssen · Phys Rev B · 1995 · 51 · 198510.1103/PhysRevB.51.1985 ↗
18. Barrat · Diamond Relat Mater · 1996 · 5 · 27610.1016/0925-9635(95)00424-6 ↗
19. Paritosh · Acta Mater · 1999 · 47 · 226910.1016/S1359-6454(99)00086-5 ↗
20. Yun · Diamond Rel Mater · 2000 · 9 · 43910.1016/S0925-9635(00)00243-0 ↗
21. Grujicic · J Mater Synt Proc · 2000 · 8 · 7310.1023/A:1026517919085 ↗
22. Carter · Vacuum · 2000 · 56 · 8710.1016/S0042-207X(99)00171-2 ↗
23. Jiang · Appl Phys A · 2002 · 74 · 21710.1007/s003390100869 ↗
24. Smereka · Acta Mater · 2005 · 53 · 119110.1016/j.actamat.2004.11.013 ↗
25. van der Drift · Philips Res Rep · 1967 · 22 · 267
26. Kitabatake · Thin Solid Films · 2000 · 369 · 25710.1016/S0040-6090(00)00819-1 ↗
27. Spiecker · Phil Mag · 2006 · 86 · 494110.1080/14786430600724447 ↗
28. Spiecker E. et al., in preparation.
29. Shaffer · J Opt Soc Am · 1969 · 59 · 149810.1364/JOSA.59.001498 ↗
30. Spiecker E, Radmilovic V, Dahmen U. In: Proc of the 16th International Microscopy Conference, Sapporo, Japan. 2006. p. 1325.