Ge incorporation inside 4H-SiC during homoepitaxial growth by chemical vapor deposition
Source abstract
Abstract
In this work, we report on the addition of GeH4 gas during homoepitaxial growth of 4H-SiC by chemical vapour deposition. Ge introduction does not affect dramatically the surface morphology and defect density though it is accompanied with Ge droplets accumulation at the surface. The Ge incorporation level inside the 4H-SiC matrix, ranging from few 1017 to few 1018 at.cm-3, was found to be mainly affected by the growth temperature and GeH4 flux. Other growth parameters like C/Si ratio, polarity, or off-orientation did not show any significant influence. On the other hand, adding GeH4 led to the increase of the intentional n type doping level by a factor of 2 to 5 depending on the C/Si ratio in the gas phase.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Silicon Carbide Semiconductor Technologies · Semiconductor materials and devices · Thin-Film Transistor Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (36)
Show source-provided references
1. Leone · Mater Sci Forum · 2009 · 600 · 10710.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.600-603.107 ↗
2. La Via · Chem Vap Dep · 2006 · 12 · 50910.1002/cvde.200506465 ↗
3. Krishnan · J Cryst Growth · 2011 · 321 · 810.1016/j.jcrysgro.2011.02.010 ↗
4. Song · Appl Phys Lett · 2006 · 89 · 15211210.1063/1.2354485 ↗
5. Lebedev · Semiconductor · 1999 · 33 · 10710.1134/1.1187657 ↗
6. Tien · J Appl Phy · 2012 · 112 · 08371110.1063/1.4759362 ↗
7. Beyer · J Appl Phys · 2011 · 110 · 12370110.1063/1.3669401 ↗
8. Dimitriev VA, Rendakova S, Carter CH Jr, Ivantsov V. U.S. Patent Oct. 21, 1997; 5679153.
9. Filip · J Cryst Growth · 2004 · 271 · 14210.1016/j.jcrysgro.2004.07.040 ↗
10. Lorenzzi · J Cryst Growth · 2010 · 312 · 344310.1016/j.jcrysgro.2010.08.058 ↗
11. Habka · Mater Sci Forum · 2009 · 600 · 52910.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.600-603.529 ↗
12. Pezoldt J
13. Lorenzzi · Mater Sci Forum · 2010 · 645 · 17110.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.645-648.171 ↗
14. Lorenzzi · Mater Sci Forum · 2011 · 679 · 43310.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.679-680.433 ↗
15. Katulka · J Appl Phys Lett · 1999 · 74 · 54010.1063/1.123186 ↗
16. Rafiqu · Vacuum · 2007 · 81 · 106210.1016/j.vacuum.2007.01.062 ↗
17. Sledziewski · Mater Sci Forum · 2014 · 778 · 26110.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.778-780.261 ↗
18. Vivona · Mater Sci Forum · 2014 · 778 · 70610.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.778-780.706 ↗
19. Nakashima · Phys Status Solidi A · 1997 · 162 · 3910.1002/1521-396X(199707)162:1<39::AID-PSSA39>3.0.CO;2-L ↗
20. Kolobov · J Appl Phys · 2000 · 87 · 292610.1063/1.372279 ↗
21. Tsuchida · Phys Status Solidi · 2009 · 246 · 155310.1002/pssb.200945056 ↗
22. Shiyang · J Cryst Growth · 2013 · 380 · 8510.1016/j.jcrysgro.2013.05.039 ↗
23. Siche · Mater Sci Forum · 2005 · 483 · 3910.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.483-485.39 ↗
24. Jeong · Electrochem Soc · 2004 · 151 · 25210.1149/1.1650839 ↗
25. Dashiell · Appl Phys Lett · 2004 · 85 · 225210.1063/1.1791741 ↗
26. Marinova · Mater Sci Forum · 2009 · 615 · 18510.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.615-617.185 ↗
27. Chandran N., Secondauthor M.N., Thirdauthor G.N., Ferro G., Alassaad K., Polychroniadis E.K., HeteroSiC – WASMPE” Conference, oral presentation, 17–19 June 2013.
28. Diani · Phys Rev B · 2003 · 67 · 12531610.1103/PhysRevB.67.125316 ↗
29. Guedj · Appl Phys Lett · 1999 · 74 · 69110.1063/1.122989 ↗
30. Pedersen · J Cryst Growth · 2009 · 311 · 132110.1016/j.jcrysgro.2008.12.029 ↗
31. Fanton · J Cryst Growth · 2008 · 310 · 408810.1016/j.jcrysgro.2008.06.027 ↗
32. Forsberg · J Cryst Growth · 2002 · 236 · 10110.1016/S0022-0248(01)02198-4 ↗
33. Kojima · J. Microelectron Eng · 2006 · 83 · 7910.1016/j.mee.2005.10.030 ↗
34. Forsberg · J Cryst Growth · 2003 · 253 · 34010.1016/S0022-0248(03)01045-5 ↗
35. Linnarsson · Appl Surf Sci · 2006 · 252 · 531610.1016/j.apsusc.2005.12.024 ↗
36. Yamamoto · Mater Sci Forum · 1998 · 264 · 11110.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.264-268.111 ↗