journal article·2023-11

Colloidal solution combustion synthesis of am-TiO2/o-YFeO3 nanocomposites: effect of titania loading on the photo-Fenton-like activity

Thanh Son Cam, Anna Sergeevna Seroglazova, Maria Igorevna Chebanenko, Botirjon Mardiyev, Ekaterina Vladimirovna Dzhevaga, Oksana Vladimirovna Almjasheva, Vadim Igorevich Popkov

Publisher page

Abstract

No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.

Source: Not provided · Quality: missing

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques · TiO2 Photocatalysis and Solar Cells · Pigment Synthesis and Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (50)

Show source-provided references
1. Pizzolato TM, Carissimi E, Machado EL, Schneider IAH (2002) Colour removal with NaClO of dye wastewater from an agate-processing plant in Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. Int J Min Process 65:203–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-7516(01)00082-510.1016/S0301-7516(01)00082-5 ↗
2. Sahoo C, Gupta AK, Pal A (2005) Photocatalytic degradation of Crystal Violet (C.I. Basic Violet 3) on silver ion doped TiO2. Dye Pigment 66:189–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dyepig.2004.09.00310.1016/j.dyepig.2004.09.003 ↗
3. Senthilkumaar S, Porkodi K (2005) Heterogeneous photocatalytic decomposition of Crystal Violet in UV-illuminated sol-gel derived nanocrystalline TiO2 suspensions. J Colloid Interface Sci 288:184–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2005.02.06610.1016/j.jcis.2005.02.066 ↗
4. Bumpus JA, Brock BJ (1988) Biodegradation of crystal violet by the white rot fungus Phanerochaete chrysosporium. Appl Environ Microbiol 54:1143–1150. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.54.5.1143-1150.198810.1128/aem.54.5.1143-1150.1988 ↗
5. Yatome C, Yamada S, Ogawa T, Matsui M (1993) Degradation of Crystal violet by Nocardia corallina. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 38:565–569. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0024295610.1007/BF00242956 ↗
6. Wu J-S, Liu C-H, Chu KH, Suen S-Y (2008) Removal of cationic dye methyl violet 2B from water by cation exchange membranes. J Memb Sci 309:239–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2007.10.03510.1016/j.memsci.2007.10.035 ↗
7. Sanromán MA, Pazos M, Ricart MT, Cameselle C (2004) Electrochemical decolourisation of structurally different dyes. Chemosphere 57:233–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2004.06.01910.1016/j.chemosphere.2004.06.019 ↗
8. Rai A, Thakur AK (2017) Effect of co-substitution on structural, optical, dielectric and magnetic behavior of LaFeO3. J Alloy Compd 695:3579–3588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.11.40710.1016/j.jallcom.2016.11.407 ↗
9. Nagrare BS, Kekade SS, Thombare B et al. (2018) Hyperfine interaction, Raman and magnetic study of YFeO3 nanocrystals. Solid State Commun 280:32–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssc.2018.06.00410.1016/j.ssc.2018.06.004 ↗
10. Toan N, Saukko S, Lantto V (2003) Gas sensing with semiconducting perovskite oxide LaFeO3. Phys B Condens Matter 327:279–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-4526(02)01764-710.1016/S0921-4526(02)01764-7 ↗
11. Shin TH, Ida S, Ishihara T (2011) Doped CeO2-LaFeO3 Composite Oxide as an Active Anode for Direct Hydrocarbon-Type Solid Oxide Fuel Cells. J Am Chem Soc 133:19399–19407. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja206278f10.1021/ja206278f ↗
12. Seroglazova AS, Chebanenko MI, Popkov VI (2021) Synthesis, structure, and photo-Fenton activity of PrFeO3-TiO2 mesoporous nanocomposites. Kondens sredy i mezhfaznye granitsy = Condens Matter Interphases 23:548–560. https://doi.org/10.17308/kcmf.2021.23/367410.17308/kcmf.2021.23/3674 ↗
13. Tang P, Xie X, Chen H et al. (2019) Synthesis of Nanoparticulate PrFeO3 by Sol–Gel Method and its Visible-Light Photocatalytic Activity. Ferroelectrics 546:181–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/00150193.2019.159247010.1080/00150193.2019.1592470 ↗
14. Tikhanova S, Seroglazova A, Chebanenko M et al. (2022) Effect of TiO2 Additives on the Stabilization of h-YbFeO3 and Promotion of Photo-Fenton Activity of o-YbFeO3/h-YbFeO3/r-TiO2 Nanocomposites. Mater (Basel) 15:8273. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1522827310.3390/ma15228273 ↗
15. Tikhanova SM, Lebedev LA, Martinson KD et al. (2021) Synthesis of novel heterojunction h-YbFeO3/o-YbFeO3 photocatalyst with enhanced Fenton-like activity under visible-light. N. J Chem 45:1541–1550. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0NJ04895J10.1039/D0NJ04895J ↗
16. Seroglazova AS, Popkov VI (2022) Synthesis of highly active and visible-light-driven PrFeO3 photocatalyst using solution combustion approach and succinic acid as fuel. Nanosyst Phys, Chem Math 13:649–654. https://doi.org/10.17586/2220-8054-2022-13-6-649-65410.17586/2220-8054-2022-13-6-649-654 ↗
17. Seroglazova AS, Chebanenko MI, Nevedomskyi VN, Popkov VI (2023) Solution combustion synthesis of novel PrFeO3/CeO2 nanocomposite with enhanced photo-Fenton activity under visible light. Ceram Int 49:15468–15479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2023.01.13210.1016/j.ceramint.2023.01.132 ↗
18. Ismael M, Elhaddad E, Taffa D, Wark M (2017) Synthesis of Phase Pure Hexagonal YFeO3 Perovskite as Efficient Visible Light Active Photocatalyst. Catalysts 7:326. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal711032610.3390/catal7110326 ↗
19. Ju L, Chen Z, Fang L et al. (2011) Sol-Gel Synthesis and Photo-Fenton-Like Catalytic Activity of EuFeO3 Nanoparticles. J Am Ceram Soc 94:3418–3424. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-2916.2011.04522.x10.1111/j.1551-2916.2011.04522.x ↗
20. Zhang R, Wang X, Yu C et al. (2020) Preparation of Multiferroic YFeO3 Nanofibers and the Photocatalytic Activity under Visible Irradiation. Integr Ferroelectr 206:105–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584587.2020.172863110.1080/10584587.2020.1728631 ↗
21. Seroglazova AS, Lebedev LA, Chebanenko MI et al. (2022) Ox/Red-controllable combustion synthesis of foam-like PrFeO3 nanopowders for effective photo-Fenton degradation of methyl violet. Adv Powder Technol 33:103398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apt.2021.10339810.1016/j.apt.2021.103398 ↗
22. Rusevova K, Köferstein R, Rosell M et al. (2014) LaFeO3 and BiFeO3 perovskites as nanocatalysts for contaminant degradation in heterogeneous Fenton-like reactions. Chem Eng J 239:322–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2013.11.02510.1016/j.cej.2013.11.025 ↗
23. Thirumalairajan S, Girija K, Ganesh I et al. (2012) Controlled synthesis of perovskite LaFeO3 microsphere composed of nanoparticles via self-assembly process and their associated photocatalytic activity. Chem Eng J 209:420–428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2012.08.01210.1016/j.cej.2012.08.012 ↗
24. Zhou Z, Guo L, Yang H et al. (2014) Hydrothermal synthesis and magnetic properties of multiferroic rare-earth orthoferrites. J Alloy Compd 583:21–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2013.08.12910.1016/j.jallcom.2013.08.129 ↗
25. Qin C, Li Z, Chen G et al. (2015) Fabrication and visible-light photocatalytic behavior of perovskite praseodymium ferrite porous nanotubes. J Power Sources 285:178–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.03.09610.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.03.096 ↗
26. Sarikhani F, Zabardasti A, Soleymani AR, Naseri M (2020) Enhanced visible light activity of EuFeO3/TiO2 nanocomposites prepared by thermal treatment-hydrolysis precipitation method. Appl Phys A 126:476. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-020-03593-410.1007/s00339-020-03593-4 ↗
27. Varma A, Mukasyan AS, Rogachev AS, Manukyan KV (2016) Solution combustion synthesis of nanoscale materials. Chem Rev 116:14493–14586. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b0027910.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00279 ↗
28. Tang G, Gong D, Liu H, Wang L (2019) Highly Loaded Mesoporous Ni-La2O3 Catalyst Prepared by Colloidal Solution Combustion Method for CO2 Methanation. Catalysts 9:442. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal905044210.3390/catal9050442 ↗
29. Van Leeuwen PWNM (2016) Homogeneous Metal Catalysis. In: Reference Module in Chemistry, Molecular Sciences and Chemical Engineering. Elsevier, pp 1–4510.1016/B978-0-12-409547-2.11101-1 ↗
30. Liu Y, Mao D, Yu J et al. (2020) Facile preparation of highly active and stable CuO-CeO2 catalysts for low-temperature CO oxidation via a direct solvothermal method. Catal Sci Technol 10:8383–8395. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0CY01729A10.1039/D0CY01729A ↗
31. Omarov SO, Martinson KD, Matveyeva AN et al. (2022) Renewable hydrogen production via glycerol steam reforming over Ni/CeO2 catalysts obtained by solution combustion method: The effect of Ni loading. Fuel Process Technol 236:107429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2022.10742910.1016/j.fuproc.2022.107429 ↗
32. Thommes M, Kaneko K, Neimark AV et al. (2015) Physisorption of gases, with special reference to the evaluation of surface area and pore size distribution (IUPAC Technical Report). Pure Appl Chem 87:1051–1069. https://doi.org/10.1515/pac-2014-111710.1515/pac-2014-1117 ↗
33. Matveyeva AN, Omarov SO, Gavrilova MA et al. (2022) CeFeO3-CeO2-Fe2O3 Systems: Synthesis by Solution Combustion Method and Catalytic Performance in CO2 Hydrogenation. Mater (Basel) 15:7970. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1522797010.3390/ma15227970 ↗
34. Alsaiari MA, Alhemiary NA, Umar A, Hayden BE (2020) Growth of amorphous, anatase and rutile phase TiO2 thin films on Pt/TiO2/SiO2/Si (SSTOP) substrate for resistive random access memory (ReRAM) device application. Ceram Int 46:16310–16320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.03.18810.1016/j.ceramint.2020.03.188 ↗
35. Hardcastle FD (2011) Raman Spectroscopy of Titania (TiO2) Nanotubular Water-Splitting Catalysts. J Ark Acad Sci 65: https://doi.org/10.54119/jaas.2011.650410.54119/jaas.2011.6504 ↗
36. Bradley JDB, Evans CC, Choy JT et al. (2012) Submicrometer-wide amorphous and polycrystalline anatase TiO2 waveguides for microphotonic devices. Opt Express 20:23821. https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.20.02382110.1364/OE.20.023821 ↗
37. Lazarevic Z, Jovalekic C, Gilic M et al. (2017) Yttrium orthoferrite powder obtained by the mechanochemical synthesis. Sci Sinter 49:277–284. https://doi.org/10.2298/SOS1703277L10.2298/SOS1703277L ↗
38. Kuz’menko AP, Abakumov PV (2011) Raman imaging of domains and fine structure of domain walls in YFeO3 crystals. Tech Phys Lett 37:1058–1061. https://doi.org/10.1134/S106378501111026510.1134/S1063785011110265 ↗
39. Tang P, Chen H, Cao F, Pan G (2011) Magnetically recoverable and visible-light-driven nanocrystalline YFeO3 photocatalysts. Catal Sci Technol 1:1145. https://doi.org/10.1039/c1cy00199j10.1039/c1cy00199j ↗
40. Li L, Wang L, Hu T et al. (2014) Preparation of highly photocatalytic active CdS/TiO2 nanocomposites by combining chemical bath deposition and microwave-assisted hydrothermal synthesis. J Solid State Chem 218:81–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssc.2014.06.02710.1016/j.jssc.2014.06.027 ↗
41. Siva Kumar S, Ranga Rao V, Nageswara Rao G (2022) Effect of morphology, crystallite size and optical band gap on photocatalytic activity of ZnO nanostructures for decolorization of R6G. Mater Today Proc 62:5494–5502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.04.22010.1016/j.matpr.2022.04.220 ↗
42. Abdullah BJ (2022) Size effect of band gap in semiconductor nanocrystals and nanostructures from density functional theory within HSE06. Mater Sci Semicond Process 137:106214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mssp.2021.10621410.1016/j.mssp.2021.106214 ↗
43. Divya T, Renuka NK (2015) Modulated heterogeneous Fenton-like activity of ‘M’ doped nanoceria systems (M = Cu, Fe, Zr, Dy, La): Influence of reduction potential of doped cations. J Mol Catal A Chem 408:41–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcata.2015.07.01810.1016/j.molcata.2015.07.018 ↗
44. Subramanian Y, Ramasamy V, Karthikeyan RJ et al. (2019) Investigations on the enhanced dye degradation activity of heterogeneous BiFeO3-GdFeO3 nanocomposite photocatalyst. Heliyon 5:e01831. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e0183110.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01831 ↗
45. Li L, Zhang M, Tian P et al. (2014) Synergistic photocatalytic activity of LnFeO3 (Ln = Pr, Y) perovskites under visible-light illumination. Ceram Int 40:13813–13817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2014.05.09710.1016/j.ceramint.2014.05.097 ↗
46. Shi J, Huang W, Zhu H et al. (2020) Modified TiO2 particles for heterogeneous photocatalysis under solar irradiation. Mater Lett 279:128472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2020.12847210.1016/j.matlet.2020.128472 ↗
47. Le Boulbar E, Millon E, Boulmer-Leborgne C et al. (2014) Optical properties of rare earth-doped TiO2 anatase and rutile thin films grown by pulsed-laser deposition. Thin Solid Films 553:13–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsf.2013.11.03210.1016/j.tsf.2013.11.032 ↗
48. Ismail AA, Robben L, Bahnemann DW (2011) Study of the Efficiency of UV and Visible-Light Photocatalytic Oxidation of Methanol on Mesoporous RuO2-TiO2 Nanocomposites. ChemPhysChem 12:982–991. https://doi.org/10.1002/cphc.20100093610.1002/cphc.201000936 ↗
49. Zhang Z, Hedhili MN, Zhu H, Wang P (2013) Electrochemical reduction induced self-doping of Ti3+ for efficient water splitting performance on TiO2 based photoelectrodes. Phys Chem Chem Phys 15:15637. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3cp52759j10.1039/c3cp52759j ↗
50. Bhosale RR, Pujari SR, Muley GG et al. (2014) Solar photocatalytic degradation of methylene blue using doped TiO2 nanoparticles. Sol Energy 103:473–479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2014.02.04310.1016/j.solener.2014.02.043 ↗