journal article·2020-06

Coating Ti6Al4V substrate with the triple-layer glass-ceramic compositions using sol–gel method; the critical effect of the composition of the layers on the mechanical and in vitro biological performance

S. Shorvazi, F. Kermani, S. Mollazadeh, A. Kiani-Rashid, S. Kargozar, A. Youssefi

Publisher page

Abstract

In the present study, three-layer glass-ceramic coatings of different chemical compositions were synthesized and coated on the Ti6Al4V substrate using the sol–gel method. Hydroxyapatite, hydroxyapatite–wollastonite, and wollastonite–anorthite were coated on the Ti6Al4V substrate, respectively. X-ray diffraction results showed that crystallinity of the main phase in the first (hydroxyapatite (94 wt%)), second (wollastonite (88 wt%)), and third (anorthite (80 wt%)) layers were about 70%, 61%, and 55%, respectively. Scanning electron microscopy analysis showed that when the applied coatings were heat-treated at 800 °C, the morphology of the first layer was changed from spherical to needle-like morphology. The values of microhardness for the first, second, and third layers of the coating were measured as 400, 503.3, and 750.4 Hv, respectively. The mean values of the surface roughness for the mentioned layers, which was analyzed using atomic force microscopy (AFM), were 20, 54, and 63 nm, respectively. The results showed that the coated samples interacted with SBF medium, resulting in the increment of pH and the formation of hydroxyapatite on the coated substrate. MTT assay indicated that the coating process and the coating layers had no adverse effect on the viability of the human osteoblastic SaOS2 osteosarcoma cell line. Cell attachment results showed that the SaOS2 cell line was well attached and expanded on each layer of the coating.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Dental materials and restorations · Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (37)

Show source-provided references
1. Niinomi Mitsuo, Boehlert CarlJ (2015) “Titanium alloys for biomedical applications.” Advances in Metallic Biomaterials. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, p 179–213
2. Chouirfa H, Bouloussa H, Migonney V (2018) Review of titanium surface modification techniques and coatings for antibacterial applications numerous solutions exist to render titanium surfaces antibacterial. The using bioactive polymers to improve the biologiocal response. Acta Biomater 83:37–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2018.10.03610.1016/j.actbio.2018.10.036 ↗
3. Kaur M, Singh K (2019) Review on titanium and titanium based alloys as biomaterials for orthopaedic applications. Mater Sci Eng C 102:844–862. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2019.04.06410.1016/j.msec.2019.04.064 ↗
4. Kargozar S, Ramakrishna S, Mozafari M (2019) Chemistry of biomaterials: future prospects. Curr Opin Biomed Eng 10:181–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobme.2019.07.00310.1016/j.cobme.2019.07.003 ↗
5. Kargozar S, Hamzehlou S, Baino F (2019) Can bioactive glasses be useful to accelerate the healing of epithelial tissues? Mater Sci Eng C 97:1009–1020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2019.01.02810.1016/j.msec.2019.01.028 ↗
6. Kargozar S, Kermani F, Beidokhti SM, Hamzehlou S (2019) Functionalization and surface modifications of bioactive glasses (BGs): tailoring of the biological response working on the outermost surface layer. Mater (Basel) 12:3696–3714. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1222369610.3390/ma12223696 ↗
7. Kargozar S, Mozafari M (2018) Nanotechnology and nanomedicine: start small, think big. Mater Today Proc 5:15492–15500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2018.04.15510.1016/j.matpr.2018.04.155 ↗
8. Yazdanpanah A, Bretcanu O, Ramedani A (2018) Glass-ceramics for cancer treatment: so close, or yet so far? Acta Biomater 83:55–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2018.11.01310.1016/j.actbio.2018.11.013 ↗
9. Kargozar S, Baino F, Hamzehlou S et al. (2018) Bioactive glasses: sprouting angiogenesis in tissue engineering. Trends Biotechnol 36:430–444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2017.12.00310.1016/j.tibtech.2017.12.003 ↗
10. Gopi D, Karthika A, Nithiya S, Kavitha L (2014) In vitro biological performance of minerals substituted hydroxyapatite coating by pulsed electrodeposition method. Mater Chem Phys 144:75–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2013.12.01710.1016/j.matchemphys.2013.12.017 ↗
11. Guo L, Yan Z, Yu Y et al. (2019) CMAS resistance characteristics of LaPO 4 / YSZ thermal barrier coatings at 1250 °C–1350 °C. Corros Sci 154:111–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2019.04.01410.1016/j.corsci.2019.04.014 ↗
12. Zhang S, Li J, Ni W, Li K (2019) Influence of boron substitution on the crystallisation behaviour of system. J Eur Ceram Soc 39:5068–5076. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2019.07.01810.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2019.07.018 ↗
13. Belhouchet H, Leriche F.C.M.H.A. (2016) Preparation and characterization of anorthite and hydroxyapatite from Algerian kaolin and natural phosphate. J Therm Anal Calorim https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-016-5655-810.1007/s10973-016-5655-8 ↗
14. Kermani F, Kargozar S, Tayarani-Najaran Z et al. (2019) Synthesis of nano HA/βTCP mesoporous particles using a simple modification in granulation method. Mater Sci Eng C 96:859–871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2018.11.04510.1016/j.msec.2018.11.045 ↗
15. Magyari K, Pap Z, Tóth ZR et al. (2019) The impact of copper oxide nanoparticles on the structure and applicability of bioactive glasses. J Sol Gel Sci Technol 91:634–643. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10971-019-05066-410.1007/s10971-019-05066-4 ↗
16. Sanyal S, Shukla M, Dandapat N, Ghosh S (2018) In vitro evaluation of bioactive glass ceramic coating for application on Ti6Al4V based biomedical implants. J Non Cryst Solids 500:22–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2018.04.04310.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2018.04.043 ↗
17. Azari A, Nikzad S, Yazdani A et al. (2017) Deposition of crystalline hydroxyapatite nano-particle on zirconia ceramic: a potential solution for the poor bonding characteristic of zirconia ceramics to resin cement. J Mater Sci Mater Med 28:62–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-017-5921-810.1007/s10856-017-5921-8 ↗
18. Guillot R, Gilde F, Becquart P et al. (2013) The stability of BMP loaded polyelectrolyte multilayer coatings on titanium. Biomaterials 34:5737–5746. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.03.06710.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.03.067 ↗
19. Heise S, Ramos Rivera L, Boccaccini AR (2019) Bioactive glass containing coatings by electrophoretic deposition: development and applications. Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-102196-5.00001-X10.1016/B978-0-08-102196-5.00001-X ↗
20. Xiao J, Rogachev AV, Yarmolenko VA et al. (2019) Formation features, structure and properties of bioactive coatings based on phosphate-calcium layers, deposited by a low energy electron beam. Surf Coat Technol 359:6–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2018.12.05110.1016/j.surfcoat.2018.12.051 ↗
21. Lenis JA, Toro LJ, Bolívar FJ (2019) Multi-layer bactericidal silver—calcium phosphate coatings obtained by RF magnetron sputtering. Surf Coat Technol 367:203–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2019.03.03810.1016/j.surfcoat.2019.03.038 ↗
22. Suriani N, Nik S, Nizam A, Malek N (2019) Preparation and characterization of hydroxyapatite incorporated silica aerogel and its effect on normal human dermal fi broblast cells. J Sol Gel Sci Technol 90:422–433. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10971-019-04946-z10.1007/s10971-019-04946-z ↗
23. Delneuville C, Danloy EP, Wang L (2018) Single cyanobacteria@silica porous microcapsules via a sol–gel layer by layer for heavy-metal remediation. J Sol Gel Sci Technol 899:244–254. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10971-018-4687-x10.1007/s10971-018-4687-x ↗
24. Durairaj K, Senthilkumar P, Velmurugan P, Dhamodaran K (2019) Sol-gel mediated synthesis of silica nanoparticle from Bambusa vulgaris leaves and its environmental applications: kinetics and isotherms studies. J Sol-Gel Sci Technol 90:653–664. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10971-019-04922-710.1007/s10971-019-04922-7 ↗
25. Aleksej IG, Kanji Z, Kunio T, Aivaras I (2019) A novel synthetic approach for the calcium hydroxyapatite from the food products. J Sol-Gel Sci Technol 91:63–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10971-019-05020-410.1007/s10971-019-05020-4 ↗
26. Encinas-romero A, Paya SR (2010) Mechanical and bioactive behavior of hydroxyapatite–wollastonite sintered composites. Int J Appl Ceram Technol 177:164–177. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7402.2009.02377.x10.1111/j.1744-7402.2009.02377.x ↗
27. Kawaguchi T, Ono K (1990) Spherical silica gels precipitated from acid catalyzed TEOS solutions. J Non Cryst Solids 121:383–388. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3093(90)90162-F10.1016/0022-3093(90)90162-F ↗
28. Kokubo T, Takadama H (2006) How useful is SBF in predicting in vivo bone bioactivity? Biomaterials 27:2907–2915. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.01.01710.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.01.017 ↗
29. Mollazadeh S, Eftekhari Yekta B, Javadpour J et al. (2013) The role of TiO2, ZrO2, BaO and SiO2 on the mechanical properties and crystallization behavior of fluorapatite-mullite glass-ceramics. J Non Cryst Solids 361:70–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2012.10.00910.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2012.10.009 ↗
30. Esslinger S, Gadow R (2019) Additive manufacturing of bioceramic scaffolds by combination of FDM and slip casting. J Eur Ceram Soc. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2019.10.02910.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2019.10.029 ↗
31. Ibrahim MZ, Sarhan AAD, Kuo TY et al. (2019) Characterization and hardness enhancement of amorphous Fe-based metallic glass laser cladded on nickel-free stainless steel for biomedical implant application. Mater Chem Phys 235:121745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2019.12174510.1016/j.matchemphys.2019.121745 ↗
32. Xu LJ, Chen YY, Liu ZG, Kong FT (2008) The microstructure and properties of Ti–Mo– b alloys for biomedical application. Alloy Compd 453:320–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2006.11.14410.1016/j.jallcom.2006.11.144 ↗
33. Jouanny I, Labdi S, Aubert P et al. (2010) Structural and mechanical properties of titanium oxide thin fi lms for biomedical application. Thin Solid Films 518:3212–3217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsf.2009.09.04610.1016/j.tsf.2009.09.046 ↗
34. Ahadian S, Estili M, Surya VJ et al. (2015) Facile and green production of aqueous graphene dispersions for biomedical applications. Nanoscale 7:6436–6443. https://doi.org/10.1039/c4nr07569b10.1039/c4nr07569b ↗
35. Singh S, Ramakrishna S. Biomedical applications of additive manufacturing: present and future. Curr Opin Biomed Eng 2:105–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobme.2017.05.00610.1016/j.cobme.2017.05.006 ↗
36. Yin L, Nakanishi Y, Alao A, Song X (2017) A review of engineered zirconia surfaces in biomedical applications. Procedia CIRP 65:284–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2017.04.05710.1016/j.procir.2017.04.057 ↗
37. Kargozar S, Lotfibakhshaiesh N, Ai J et al. (2016) Synthesis, physico-chemical and biological characterization of strontium and cobalt substituted bioactive glasses for bone tissue engineering. J Non Cryst Solids 449:133–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2016.07.02510.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2016.07.025 ↗