journal article·2007-09-22

Hydrophobicity modification of woven cotton fabric by hydrophobic fumed silica coating

Thanwarat Pipatchanchai, Kawee Srikulkit

Publisher page

Abstract

Water repellency of woven cotton fabric was achieved by coating with the aqueous dispersion containing organosilane agent (HDTMS) and fumed silica. The coating agents were applied using padding method and then followed by batching the coated fabric at the ambient temperature for 24 h to allow the condensation reaction between HDTMS silanol group and fumed silica silanol group, rendering silica particles hydrophobic. An ultrasonicator was employed to prepare the homogenous coating dispersion. The water repellency evaluated by water contact angle determination which showed the contact angle over 110° was obtained with low amount of applied HDTMS of 1 wt%. The effect of fumed silica addition on an increase in fiber surface roughness geometry showed the influential result in improving the water contact angle. From durability to washing test, the hydrophobic coatings evidenced from SEM and ATR/FTIR remained adhering to fiber surface, indicating the durability. After washing, the coating on the fabric with fumed silica addition appeared to be scatter particles which made a contribution to the higher contact angle value when compared to sheet-like layer coating in case of HDTMS coating alone.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Textile materials and evaluations

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (14)

Show source-provided references
1. Linemann R, Gorenberg A, Bar G, Cantow HJ, Mulhaupt R (1997) J Coating Technol 69(871):77–8110.1007/BF02696256 ↗
2. Lee S, Cho JS, Cho GS (1999) Text Res J 69(2):104–11210.1177/004051759906900205 ↗
3. Castelvetro V, Francini G, Ciardelli G, Ceccato M (2001) Text Res J 71(5):399–40610.1177/004051750107100506 ↗
4. Cerne L, Siminic B (2004) Text Res J 74(5):426–43210.1177/004051750407400509 ↗
5. Shao H, Sun JY, Meng WD, Quing FL (2004) Text Res J 74(10):851–85510.1177/004051750407401002 ↗
6. Vukusic SB, Katovic D, Schramm C (2004) Tekstil 53(3):103–109
7. Easter EP, Ankenman BE (2005) AATCC Rev 5(11):27–31
8. Shao H, Meng WD, Qing FL (2004) J Fluorine Chem 125(5):721–72410.1016/j.jfluchem.2003.12.008 ↗
9. Mahltig B, Bottcher H (2003) J Sol–Gel Sci Technol 27(1):43–5210.1023/A:1022627926243 ↗
10. Daoud WA, Xin JH, Tao XM (2004) J Am Ceram Soc 87(9):1782–178410.1111/j.1551-2916.2004.01782.x ↗
11. Yu M, Gu G, Meng WD, Qing FL (2007) Appl Surf Sci 253(7):3669–367310.1016/j.apsusc.2006.07.086 ↗
12. Yeh JT, Chen CL, Huang KS (2007) J Appl Polym Sci 103(2):1140–114510.1002/app.25047 ↗
13. Yeh JT, Chen CL, Huang KS (2007) J Appl Polym Sci 103(5):3019–302410.1002/app.25048 ↗
14. Nagaraja D, Hegde A, Rao V (2006) Appl Surf Sci 253:1566–157210.1016/j.apsusc.2006.02.036 ↗