Photo catalytic hydrogen production using spinel ferrites
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques · Copper-based nanomaterials and applications · TiO2 Photocatalysis and Solar Cells
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (78)
Show source-provided references
1. Ismael M (2021) Ferrites as solar photocatalytic materials and their activities in solar energy conversion and environmental protection: A review. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 219:11078610.1016/j.solmat.2020.110786 ↗
2. Maji N, Dosanjh HS (2023) Ferrite nanoparticles as catalysts in organic reactions: a mini review. Magn Chem 9(6):156
3. Acharya R, Pati S, Parida K (2022) A review on visible light driven spinel ferrite-g-C3N4 photocatalytic systems with enhanced solar light utilization. J Mol Liq 357:11910510.1016/j.molliq.2022.119105 ↗
4. Boudjemaa A, Popescu I, Juzsakova T, Kebir M, Helaili N, Bachari K, Marcu I-C (2016) M-substituted (M = Co, Ni and Cu) zinc ferrite photo-catalysts for hydrogen production by water photo-reduction. Int J Hydrog Energy 41(26):11108–1111810.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.04.088 ↗
5. Wang R, Feng Y, Li D, Li K, Yan Y (2024) Towards the sustainable production of biomass-derived materials with smart functionality: a tutorial review. Green Chem 26(16):9075–910310.1039/D4GC01771D ↗
6. Rodríguez-Rodríguez AA, Moreno-Trejo MB, Meléndez-Zaragoza MJ, Collins-Martínez V, López-Ortiz A, Martínez-Guerra E, Sánchez-Dominguez M (2019) Spinel-type ferrite nanoparticles: Synthesis by the oil-in-water micro emulsion reaction method and photocatalytic water-splitting evaluation. Int J Hydrog Energy 44(24):12421–1242910.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.09.183 ↗
7. Jia J, Seitz LC, Benck JD, Hua Y, Chen Y, Ng JWD, Bilir T, Harris JS, Jaramillo TF (2016) Solar water splitting by photovoltaic-electrolysis with a solar-to-hydrogen efficiency over 30%. Nat Commun 7(1):1323710.1038/ncomms13237 ↗
8. Olabi AG, Abdelkareem MA (2022) Renewable energy and climate change. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 158:11211110.1016/j.rser.2022.112111 ↗
9. Gopinath M, Mari Muthu R (2022) A review on solar energy-based indirect water-splitting methods for hydrogen generation. Int J Hydrog Energy 47(89):37742–3775910.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.08.297 ↗
10. Anwar S, Khan F, Zhang Y, Djire A (2021) Recent development in electro catalysts for hydrogen production through water electrolysis. Int J Hydrog Energy 46(63):32284–3231710.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.06.191 ↗
11. Dai Z, Ke H, Long Z, Li R, Shi C, Su X, Qiao H, Wang K, Liu K (2021) Facile synthesis and high lithium storage properties of mesoporous polypyrrole coated CoFe2O4 nanofibers. J Alloy Compd 858:15832410.1016/j.jallcom.2020.158324 ↗
12. Baig N, Kammakakam I, Falath W (2021) Nanomaterials: a review of synthesis methods, properties, recent progress, and challenges. Mater Adv 2(6):1821–187110.1039/D0MA00807A ↗
13. Singh G, Ramadass K, DasiReddy DBC, Yuan V, Sik X, Ok Y, Bolan N, Xiao X, Ma T, Karakoti A, Yi J, Vinu A (2023) Material-based generation, storage, and utilization of hydrogen. Prog Mater Sci 135:10110410.1016/j.pmatsci.2023.101104 ↗
14. Behera A, Parida K (2021) Facile synthesis of fullerene modified ZnFe2O4 composites towards photocatalytic H2 evolution under visible light irradiation. Mater Today Proc 35:203–20610.1016/j.matpr.2020.04.255 ↗
15. Ajami A, Sheibani S, Ataie A (2024) S-scheme CoFe2O4/g-C3N4 nanocomposite with high photocatalytic activity and antibacterial capability under visible light irradiation. J Mater Res Technol 30:2168–218510.1016/j.jmrt.2024.04.010 ↗
16. Zhao Y, Adiyeri Saseendran DP, Huang C, Triana CA, Marks WR, Chen H, Zhao H, Patzke GR (2023) Oxygen evolution/reduction reaction catalysts: from in situ monitoring and reaction mechanisms to rational design. Chem Rev 123(9):6257–635810.1021/acs.chemrev.2c00515 ↗
17. Syed MB (2021). Technologies for renewable hydrogen production. Bioenergy resources and technologies, 157–198.10.1016/B978-0-12-822525-7.00013-5 ↗
18. Jones ADS, Yen KH (2023). Hydrogen use in natural gas pipeline. En. In: UL Solutions. (n.d.).
19. Rolo I, Costa VAF, Brito FP (2023) Hydrogen-based energy systems: current technology development status, opportunities and challenges. Energies 17(1):18010.3390/en17010180 ↗
20. Imran S, Hussain M (2024) Emerging trends in water splitting innovations for solar hydrogen production: Analysis, comparison, and economical insights. Int J Hydrog Energy 77:975–99610.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.06.254 ↗
21. Song H, Luo S, Huang H, Deng B, Ye J (2022) Solar-driven hydrogen production: recent advances, challenges, and future perspectives. ACS Energy Lett 7(3):1043–106510.1021/acsenergylett.1c02591 ↗
22. Wang Q, Domen K (2020) Particulate photo catalysts for light-driven water splitting: mechanisms, challenges, and design strategies. Chem Rev 120(2):919–98510.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00201 ↗
23. Domínguez-Arvizu J, Ortiz AL, Salinas-Gutierrez JM, Meléndez-Zaragoza J, Collins-Martínez V (2017). 1.34 Determination of local volumetric rate of photon absorption of NiFe2O4 photo catalyst in aqueous suspensions under visible light. In Proceedings of the XVII International Congress of the Mexican Hydrogen Society.
24. Bera S, Won D-I, Rawal SB, Kang HJ, Lee WI (2019) Design of visible-light photo catalysts by coupling of inorganic semiconductors. Catal Today 335:3–1910.1016/j.cattod.2018.11.001 ↗
25. Boukhemikhem Z, Brahimi R, Rekhila G, Fortas G, Boudjellal L, Trari M (2020) The photocatalytic hydrogen formation and NO2− oxidation on the hetero-junction Ag/NiFe2O4 prepared by chemical route. Renew Energy 145:2615–262010.1016/j.renene.2019.08.021 ↗
26. Domínguez-Arvizu JL, Jiménez-Miramontes JA, Hernández-Majalca BC, Valenzuela-Castro GE, Gaxiola-Cebreros FA, Salinas-Gutiérrez JM, Collins-Martínez V, López-Ortiz A (2022) Study of NiFe2O4/Cu2O p-n heterojunctions for hydrogen production by photocatalytic water splitting with visible light. J Mater Res Technol 21:4184–4199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.11.02610.1016/j.jmrt.2022.11.026 ↗
27. Abdullah H, Shuwanto H, Lie J, Sillanpää M (2023) Critical parameters and essential strategies in designing photo anodes to overcome the sluggish water oxidation reaction. J Environ Chem Eng 11(2):10935610.1016/j.jece.2023.109356 ↗
28. N RB, K G, Kottam N et al. (2024) Recent Review on S-Scheme Photocatalysis. Water, Air, Soil Pollut 235:570. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-024-07376-y10.1007/s11270-024-07376-y ↗
29. Salazar-Marin D, Oza G, Real JAD, Cervantes-Uribe A, Pérez-Vidal H, Kesarla MK, Torres JGT, Godavarthi S (2024) Distinguishing between type II and S-scheme heterojunction materials: a comprehensive review. Appl Surf Sci Adv 19:10053610.1016/j.apsadv.2023.100536 ↗
30. Yuan Y, Guo R, Hong L, Ji X, Lin Z, Li Z, Pan W (2021) A review of metal oxide-based Z-scheme heterojunction photo catalysts: actualities and developments. Mater Today Energy 21:10082910.1016/j.mtener.2021.100829 ↗
31. Dai Z, Zhu J, Yan J, Su J, Gao Y, Zhang X, Parsons GN (2020) An advanced dual‐function MnO2‐fabric air filter combining catalytic oxidation of formaldehyde and high‐efficiency fine particulate matter removal. Adv Funct Mater 30(42):200148810.1002/adfm.202001488 ↗
32. Li J, Yuan H, Zhang W, Jin B, Feng Q, Huang J, Jiao Z (2022) Advances in Z‐scheme semiconductor photo catalysts for the photo electrochemical applications: A review. Carbon Energy 4(3):294–33110.1002/cey2.179 ↗
33. Mamiyev Z, Balayeva NO (2022) Metal sulfide photo catalysts for hydrogen generation: a review of recent advances. Catalysts 12(11):131610.3390/catal12111316 ↗
34. Ng, B. J., Putri, L. K., Kong, X. Y., Teh, Y. W., Pasbakhsh, P., & Chai, S. P. (2020). Z‐scheme photocatalytic systems for solar water splitting. Adv Sci 7(7):1–4210.1002/advs.201903171 ↗
35. Xu Q, Zhang L, Cheng B, Fan J, Yu J (2020) S-Scheme heterojunction photo catalyst. Chem 6(7):1543–155910.1016/j.chempr.2020.06.010 ↗
36. Zhang D, Zhang D, Wang S, Li H, Liu J, Pu X, Chen P, Qin R, Hu H, Cai P (2024) Synthesize magnetic ZnFe2O4@C/Cd0.9Zn0.1S catalysts with S-scheme heterojunction to achieve extraordinary hydrogen production efficiency. J Colloid Interface Sci 657:672–68310.1016/j.jcis.2023.11.159 ↗
37. Ayyub MM, Rao CNR (2020). Design of efficient photo catalysts through band gap engineering. In Nanostructured Photo Catalysts (pp. 1–18). Elsevier10.1016/B978-0-12-817836-2.00001-6 ↗
38. Ismael M, Wark M (2022) Photocatalytic activity of CoFe2O4/g-C3N4 nanocomposite toward degradation of different organic pollutants and their inactivity toward hydrogen production: The role of the conduction band position. FlatChem 32:10033710.1016/j.flatc.2022.100337 ↗
39. Xie X, Ge P, Xue R, Lv H, Xue W, Liu E (2023) Enhanced photocatalytic H2 evolution and anti-photo corrosion of sulfide photo catalyst by improving surface reaction: A review. Int J Hydrog Energy 48(63):24264–2428410.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.03.193 ↗
40. Kulandaivalu T, Mohamed AR, Ali KA, Mohammedi M (2020) Photocatalytic carbon dioxide reforming of methane as an alternative approach for solar fuel production-a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 134:11036310.1016/j.rser.2020.110363 ↗
41. Tao X, Zhao Y, Wang S, Li C, Li R (2022) Recent advances and perspectives for solar-driven water splitting using particulate photo catalysts. Chem Soc Rev 51(9):3561–360810.1039/D1CS01182K ↗
42. Sohail M, Rauf S, Irfan M, Hayat A, Alghamdi MM, El-Zahhar AA, Ghernaout D, Al-Hadeethi Y, Lv W (2024) Recent developments, advances and strategies in heterogeneous photo catalysts for water splitting. Nanoscale Adv 6(5):1286–133010.1039/D3NA00442B ↗
43. Choi J, Jung W, Gonzalez-Carrero S, Durrant JR, Cha H, Park T (2024) Understanding charge carrier dynamics in organic photo catalysts for hydrogen evolution. Energy Environ Sci 17(21):7999–801810.1039/D4EE01808G ↗
44. Mishra S, Acharya R (2023) Recent updates in modification strategies for escalated performance of Graphene/MFe2O4 heterostructured photo catalysts towards energy and environmental applications. J Alloy Compd 960:17057610.1016/j.jallcom.2023.170576 ↗
45. Kuma ravel V, Imam M, Badreldin A, Chava R, Do J, Kang M, Abdel-Wahab A (2019) Photocatalytic hydrogen production: role of sacrificial reagents on the activity of oxide, carbon, and sulfide. Catalysts Catalysts 9(3):27610.3390/catal9030276 ↗
46. Domínguez-Arvizu JL, Jiménez-Miramontes JA, Salinas-Gutiérrez JM, Meléndez-Zaragoza MJ, López-Ortiz A, Collins-Martínez V (2019) Study of NiFe2O4 nanoparticles optical properties by a six-flux radiation model towards the photocatalytic hydrogen production. Int J Hydrog Energy 44(24):12455–1246210.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.08.148 ↗
47. Ma H, Liu C (2021) A mini-review of ferrites-based photo catalyst on application of hydrogen production. Front Energy 15(3):621–63010.1007/s11708-021-0761-0 ↗
48. Farhan A, Arshad J, Rashid EU, Ahmad H, Nawaz S, Munawar J, Zdarta J, Jesionowski T, Bilal M (2023) Metal ferrites-based nanocomposites and Nano hybrids for photocatalytic water treatment and electro catalytic water splitting. Chemosphere 310:13683510.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.136835 ↗
49. Djurišić, A. B., He, Y., & Ng, A. M. C. (2020) Visible-light photocatalysts: Prospects and challenges. APL Mater 8:1–4210.1063/1.5140497 ↗
50. Umaru D, Hafeez HY, Mohammed J, Suleiman AB, Ndikilar CE, Zakariyya Y (2023) A review of recent progress in solar fuel (Hydrogen) generation via photocatalytic water-splitting of cadmium sulfide (CdS) based photo catalyst. Appl Surf Sci Adv 18:10052010.1016/j.apsadv.2023.100520 ↗
51. Soto-Arreola A, Huerta-Flores AM, Mora-Hernández JM, Torres-Martínez LM (2018) Comparative study of the photocatalytic activity for hydrogen evolution of MFe2O4 (M=Cu, Ni) prepared by three different methods. J Photochem Photobiol A Chem 357:20–2910.1016/j.jphotochem.2018.02.016 ↗
52. Gobara HM, Nasser IM, el Nagger AMA, Eshaq GH (2017) Nanocrystal line spinel ferrite for an enriched production of hydrogen through a solar energy stimulated water splitting process. Energy 118:1234–124210.1016/j.energy.2016.11.001 ↗
53. Zhu C-C, Jiang T, Yang H-C, Li Y-Y, Li Z-J, Yao H-C (2023) ZnFe2O4 nanoparticles with iron-rich surfaces for enhanced photocatalytic water vapor splitting. Appl Surf Sci 636:15784210.1016/j.apsusc.2023.157842 ↗
54. He G, Wen Y, Ma C, Li X, Gao L, Sun Z (2021) Photocatalytic hydrogen evolution of Nano porous CoFe2O4 and NiFe2O4 for water splitting. Int J Hydrog Energy 46(7):5369–537710.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.11.107 ↗
55. Jasrotia R, Verma A, Ahmed J, Khanna V, Fazil M, Alshehri SM, Kumari S, Kumar P, Ahmad T, Kandwal A (2024) Mg1-xNixGayFe2-yO4 Nano catalysts for green hydrogen generation with highly efficient photo/electro catalytic water splitting applications. Int J Hydrog Energy 52:1228–124010.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.11.024 ↗
56. Vijayaraghavan T, Lakshmana Reddy N, Shankar MV, Vadivel S, Ashok A (2018) A co-catalyst free, eco-friendly, novel visible light absorbing iron based complex oxide nanocomposites for enhanced photocatalytic hydrogen evolution. Int J Hydrog Energy 43(31):14417–1442610.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.06.036 ↗
57. Corby S, Rao RR, Steier L, Durrant JR(2021) The kinetics of metal oxide photo anodes from charge generation to catalysis Nature ReV Mater 6(12):1136–115510.1038/s41578-021-00343-7 ↗
58. Zeng D, Wang J, Xie Y, Ling Y, Zhao J, Ye H, Chen T (2022) TiO2@ZnFe2O4 heterojunctions for efficient photocatalytic degradation of persistent pollutants and hydrogen evolution. Mater Chem Phys 277:12546210.1016/j.matchemphys.2021.125462 ↗
59. Chamani S, Sadeghi E, Peighambardoust NS, Doganay F, Yanalak G, Eroglu Z, Aslan E, Asghari E, Metin O, Patir IH, Aydemir U, Khatamian M (2022) Photocatalytic hydrogen evolution performance of metal ferrites /polypyrrole nanocomposites. Int J Hydrog Energy 47(77):32940–3295410.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.07.193 ↗
60. Dai J, Xu M, Chen J, Yang X, Ke Z (2007) PCDD/F, PAH and heavy metals in the sewage sludge from six wastewater treatment plants in Beijing, China. Chemosphere 66(2):353–36110.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.04.072 ↗
61. Das KK, Patnaik S, Man Singh S, Behera A, Mohanty A, Acharya C, Parida KM (2020) Enhanced photocatalytic activities of polypyrrole sensitized zinc ferrite/graphitic carbon nitride n-n heterojunction towards ciprofloxacin degradation, hydrogen evolution and antibacterial studies. J Colloid Interface Sci 561:551–56710.1016/j.jcis.2019.11.030 ↗
62. Jo W-K, Moru S, Tonda S (2020) Magnetically responsive SnFe2O4/g-C3N4 hybrid photo catalysts with remarkable visible-light-induced performance for degradation of environmentally hazardous substances and sustainable hydrogen production. Appl Surf Sci 506:14493910.1016/j.apsusc.2019.144939 ↗
63. Shoaib M, Naz MY, Hussain MA, Shukrullah S, Ghanim AAJ, Irfan M, Rahman S (2024) Synthesis and testing of NixZn1-xFe2O4/CNTs photo responsive magnetic composite catalysts for hydrogen generation from water splitting. J Solid State Chem 329:12435810.1016/j.jssc.2023.124358 ↗
64. Aksoy M, Yanalak G, Aslan E, Patır İH, Metin Ӧ (2020) Visible light-driven hydrogen evolution by using mesoporous carbon nitride-metal ferrite (MFe2O4/mpg-CN; M: Mn, Fe, Co and Ni) nanocomposites as catalysts. Int J Hydrog Energy 45(33):16509–1651810.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.04.111 ↗
65. Belakehal R, Atacan K, Guy N, Megriche A, Özacar M (2022) Fabrication of heterostructured CdS/g-C3N4/ZnFe2O4 nanocomposite synthesized through ultrasonic-assisted method for efficient photocatalytic hydrogen production. Appl Surf Sci 602:15431510.1016/j.apsusc.2022.154315 ↗
66. Chen J, Zhao D, Diao Z, Wang M, Shen S (2016) Ferrites boosting photocatalytic hydrogen evolution over graphitic carbon nitride: a case study of (Co, Ni) Fe2O4 modification. Sci Bull 61(4):292–30110.1007/s11434-016-0995-0 ↗
67. Firtina-Ertis I, Kerkez-Kuyumcu Ö (2022) Synthesis of NiFe2O4/TiO2-Ag+ S-scheme photo catalysts by a novel complex-assisted vapor thermal method for photocatalytic hydrogen production. J Photochem Photobiol A Chem 432:11410610.1016/j.jphotochem.2022.114106 ↗
68. Li C, Che H, Hua P, Yan Y, Liu C, Dong H (2021) Confinement of ultrasmall CoFe2O4 nanoparticles in hierarchical ZnIn2S4 microspheres with enhanced interfacial charge separation for photocatalytic H2 evolution. J Colloid Interface Sci 581:764–77310.1016/j.jcis.2020.08.019 ↗
69. Mehtab A, Banerjee S, Mao Y, Ahmad T (2022) Type-II CuFe2O4 /Graphitic carbon nitride heterojunctions for high-efficiency photocatalytic and electro catalytic hydrogen generation. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 14(39):44317–4432910.1021/acsami.2c11140 ↗
70. Nagajyothi PC, Devarayapalli KC, Shim J, Prabhakar Vattikuti SV (2020) Highly efficient white-LED-light-driven photocatalytic hydrogen production using highly crystalline ZnFe2O4/MoS2 nanocomposites. Int J Hydrog Energy 45(57):32756–3276910.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.03.047 ↗
71. Shao Z, Zeng T, He Y, Zhang D, Pu X (2019) A novel magnetically separable CoFe2O4/Cd0.9Zn0.1S photo catalyst with remarkably enhanced H2 evolution activity under visible light irradiation. Chem Eng J 359:485–49510.1016/j.cej.2018.11.163 ↗
72. Kumar A, Sharma P, Sharma G, Dhiman P, Mola GT, Farghali M, Rashawn AK, Nasr M, Osman AI, Wang T (2024) Simultaneous hydrogen production and photocatalytic pollutant removal: a review. Environ Chem Lett 22(5):2405–242410.1007/s10311-024-01756-w ↗
73. Ashraf M, Ullah N, Khan I, Tremel W, Ahmad S, Tahir MN (2023) Photo reforming of waste polymers for sustainable hydrogen fuel and chemicals feedstock: waste to energy. Chem Rev 123(8):4443–450910.1021/acs.chemrev.2c00602 ↗
74. Domínguez-Arvizu JL, Jiménez-Miramontes JA, Salinas-Gutiérrez JM, Meléndez-Zaragoza MJ, López-Ortiz A, Collins-Martínez V (2017) Optical properties determination of NiFe2O4 nanoparticles and their photocatalytic evaluation towards hydrogen production. Int J Hydrog Energy 42(51):30242–30248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.09.18010.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.09.180 ↗
75. Son N, Lee J, Yoon T, Kang M (2021) Design for a longer photo induced charge separation and improved visible-light-driven H2 generation through structure reversal and oxygen vacancies via Ni substitution into ZnFe2O4 spinel. Ceram Int 47(14):20317–2033410.1016/j.ceramint.2021.04.040 ↗
76. Soto-Arreola A, Huerta-Flores AM, Mora-Hernández JM, Torres-Martínez LM (2018) Improved photocatalytic activity for water splitting over MFe2O4–ZnO (M=Cu and Ni) type-ll heterostructures. J Photochem Photobiol A Chem 364:433–44210.1016/j.jphotochem.2018.06.033 ↗
77. Kumar M, Singh NK, Kumar RS, Singh R (2024). Production of Green Hydrogen through Photo catalysis. 123:1–2410.1021/bk-2024-1468.ch001 ↗
78. Teixeira I, Quiroz J, Homsi M, Camargo P (2020). An Overview of the Photocatalytic H2 evolution by semiconductor-based materials for No specialists. J Brazil Chem Soc 636:15784210.21577/0103-5053.20190255 ↗