journal article·2013-02

Effect of microstructural uncertainty on the yield stress of nanocrystalline nickel

Lei Cao, Marisol Koslowski

Acta Materialia· Volume 61· Issue 4
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Numerical simulations can be exploited to understand the sensitivity of the mechanical properties of materials to microstructural variability and hence improve their mechanical performance and reliability. We investigate the effect of the initial microstructure of nanocrystalline (nc) nickel, i.e. grain size, grain size distribution and initial dislocation density, on the yield stress through numerical simulations using a phase field dislocation dynamics model. Our work reveals that the grain size distribution has a significant influence on the yield stress for grain sizes under 32 nm and that the initial dislocation density is of key importance in determining the yield stress. Simulations with a zero initial dislocation density exhibit an almost size-independent stress–strain behavior, while Hall–Petch effect was observed in simulations with non-zero initial dislocation density. Using the results of our simulations we construct response surface functions of the yield stress that can be propagated to obtain a probability density function of the yield stress as a function of microstructure variables. We observe that the effect of uncertainty in grain size distribution and initial dislocation density is stronger for smaller grain sizes.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and mechanical properties · Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties · High Temperature Alloys and Creep

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (46)

Show source-provided references
1. Ghosh · 2010
2. McDowell · JOM J Min Met Mater Sci · 2011 · 63 · 4510.1007/s11837-011-0045-y ↗
3. Koslowski · Phys Rev B · 2010 · 82 · 05411010.1103/PhysRevB.82.054110 ↗
4. Hemker · Annu Rev Mater Res · 2007 · 37 · 9310.1146/annurev.matsci.36.062705.134551 ↗
5. Chokshi · Scripta Metall · 1989 · 23 · 167910.1016/0036-9748(89)90342-6 ↗
6. Weertman · Mater Sci Eng A · 1993 · 166 · 16110.1016/0921-5093(93)90319-A ↗
7. Meyers · Prog Mater Sci · 2006 · 51 · 42710.1016/j.pmatsci.2005.08.003 ↗
8. Masumura · Acta Mater · 1998 · 46 · 452710.1016/S1359-6454(98)00150-5 ↗
9. Hall · Proc Phys Soc Lond B · 1951 · 64 · 74210.1088/0370-1301/64/9/302 ↗
10. Petch · J Iron Steel Inst · 1953 · 174 · 25
11. Koslowski · J Mech Phys Solids · 2011 · 59 · 142710.1016/j.jmps.2011.03.011 ↗
12. Vo · Phys Rev B · 2008 · 77 · 13410810.1103/PhysRevB.77.134108 ↗
13. Godon · Scripta Mater · 2010 · 62 · 40310.1016/j.scriptamat.2009.11.038 ↗
14. Zhu · Acta Mater · 2006 · 54 · 330710.1016/j.actamat.2006.03.022 ↗
15. Lee · Phys Rev B · 2011 · 83 · 10410110.1103/PhysRevB.83.104101 ↗
16. Hunter · Phys Rev B · 2011 · 84 · 14410810.1103/PhysRevB.84.144108 ↗
17. Khachaturyan · 1983
18. Krill Iii CE, Chen LQ. Acta Mater 2002;50:3059–75.10.1016/S1359-6454(02)00084-8 ↗
19. Steinbach · Physica D · 1996 · 94 · 13510.1016/0167-2789(95)00298-7 ↗
20. Karma · Phys Rev Lett · 2001 · 87 · 04550110.1103/PhysRevLett.87.045501 ↗
21. Aranson · Phys Rev Lett · 2000 · 85 · 11810.1103/PhysRevLett.85.118 ↗
22. Lei L, Marin JL, Koslowski M. Model Simul Mater Sci Eng 2012, submitted for publication.
23. Koslowski · J Mech Phys Solids · 2002 · 50 · 259710.1016/S0022-5096(02)00037-6 ↗
24. Wang · Acta Mater · 2001 · 49 · 184710.1016/S1359-6454(01)00075-1 ↗
25. Lei · Philos Mag · 2011 · 91 · 86510.1080/14786435.2010.533135 ↗
26. Wang · J Appl Phys · 2002 · 92 · 135110.1063/1.1492859 ↗
27. Mura · 1987
28. Hunter · Int J High Perfom Comput Appl · 2011 · 25 · 22310.1177/1094342010382534 ↗
29. Shen · Acta Mater · 2004 · 52 · 68310.1016/j.actamat.2003.10.014 ↗
30. El-Sherik · Scripta Metall Mater · 1992 · 27 · 118510.1016/0956-716X(92)90596-7 ↗
31. Nieman · Scripta Metall Mater · 1990 · 24 · 14510.1016/0956-716X(90)90582-2 ↗
32. Sanders · Acta Mater · 1997 · 45 · 401910.1016/S1359-6454(97)00092-X ↗
33. Ebrahimi · Nanostruct Mater · 1999 · 11 · 34310.1016/S0965-9773(99)00050-1 ↗
34. Dalla Torre F, Van Swygenhoven H, Victoria M. Acta Mater 2002;50:3957–70.10.1016/S1359-6454(02)00198-2 ↗
35. Dalla Torre F, Van Swygenhoven H, Schäublin R, Spätig P, Victoria M. Scripta Mater 2005;53:23–7.10.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.03.026 ↗
36. Schuh · Scripta Mater · 2002 · 46 · 73510.1016/S1359-6462(02)00062-3 ↗
37. Schuh · Acta Mater · 2003 · 51 · 43110.1016/S1359-6454(02)00427-5 ↗
38. Farkas · Mater Sci Eng A · 2005 · 412 · 31610.1016/j.msea.2005.09.043 ↗
39. Hirth · 1982
40. Swann · J Inst Met · 1961 · 50 · 133
41. Wang · J Appl Phys · 2002 · 91 · 643510.1063/1.1471389 ↗
42. Lebensohn · Acta Mater · 2001 · 49 · 272310.1016/S1359-6454(01)00172-0 ↗
43. Lee · Acta Mater · 2009 · 57 · 440410.1016/j.actamat.2009.06.002 ↗
44. Kim · Phys Rev Lett · 2010 · 104 · 21550410.1103/PhysRevLett.104.215504 ↗
45. Ward · Proc Natl Acad Sci USA · 2009 · 106 · 958010.1073/pnas.0900804106 ↗
46. Vo · Phys Rev B · 2008 · 78 · 24140210.1103/PhysRevB.78.241402 ↗