journal article·2021-07

Synthesis of hybrid polymeric fibers of different functionalized alkoxysilane coupling agents obtained via sol–gel and electrospinning technique: effect on the morphology by addition of PVA

Ricardo Enrique Padilla-Hernández, Adriana Medina-Ramirez, Alejandro Avila-Ortega, Jesús A. Barrón-Zambrano, David Muñoz-Rodríguez, Cristian Carrera-Figueiras, Yamile Pérez-Padilla

Publisher page

Abstract

Hybrid functionalized alkoxysilane/PDMS-OH and alkoxysilane/PDMS-OH/PVA polymers were synthesized through acid catalysis sol–gel technique and electrospinning procedure using hydroxyl-terminated poly(dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS-OH), poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA), and different functionalized alkoxysilane coupling agents: 3-cyanopropyl(triethoxy)silane (CPTEOS), 3-aminopropyl(triethoxy)silane (APTEOS) and trimethoxy(2-phenylethyl)silane (TMPS). Kinetic differences between hydrolyses and condensation of the three functionalized alkoxysilane coupling agents required different curing times to achieve the desired viscosity and enhance electrospinnability. The superficial morphology of the hybrid polymers analyzed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) showed that the electrospinning solution composed of PDMS-OH and functionalized alkoxysilane coupling agents were deposited as beads. However, when that sol solution was mixed with PVA, a mesh material was obtained. Adding PVA to the functionalized alkoxysilanes sol–gel polymer resulted in improved electrospinnability of functionalized silica-PVA, thereby obtaining a more fiber-like morphology. Besides, sol–gel reactions were confirmed with FTIR, and contact angle test results show that the materials obtained have higher hydrophilicity when they contain PVA.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Conducting polymers and applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (41)

Show source-provided references
1. Liu Y, He J-H, Yu J-Y, Zeng H-M (2008) Polym Int 57:632. https://doi.org/10.1002/pi.238710.1002/pi.2387 ↗
2. Xue J, Wu T, Dai Y, Xia Y (2019) Chem Rev 119:5298. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b0059310.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00593 ↗
3. Khan WS, Asmatulu R, Ceylan M, Jabbarnia A (2013) Fiber Polym 14:1235. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12221-013-1235-810.1007/s12221-013-1235-8 ↗
4. Li D, Frey MW, Baeumner AJ (2006) J Membr Sci 279:354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2005.12.03610.1016/j.memsci.2005.12.036 ↗
5. Bazhban M, Nouri M, Mokhtari J (2013) Chin J Polym Sci 31:1343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10118-013-1309-510.1007/s10118-013-1309-5 ↗
6. Haider A, Haider S, Kang I-K (2018) Arab J Chem 11:1165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arabjc.2015.11.01510.1016/j.arabjc.2015.11.015 ↗
7. Ji L, Lin Z, Medford AJ, Zhang X (2009) Carbon 47:3346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2009.08.00210.1016/j.carbon.2009.08.002 ↗
8. Kaur S, Sundarrajan S, Rana D, Sridhar R, Gopal R, Matsuura T, Ramakrishna S (2014) J Mater Sci 49:6143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-014-8308-y10.1007/s10853-014-8308-y ↗
9. Han L, Andrady AL, Ensor DS (2013) Sens Actuators B: Chem 186:52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2013.05.06910.1016/j.snb.2013.05.069 ↗
10. Cho JW, Sul KI (2001) Fiber Polym 2:135. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0287532610.1007/BF02875326 ↗
11. Brinker CJ, Scherer GW (1990) Sol-gel science: the physics and chemistry of sol-gel processing. Academic Press, San Diego
12. Hench LL, West JK (1990) Chem Rev 90:33. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr00099a00310.1021/cr00099a003 ↗
13. Rahimi A (2004) Iran Polym J 13:149
14. Avnir D, Coradin T, Lev O, Livage J (2006) J Mater Chem 16:1013. https://doi.org/10.1039/B512706H10.1039/B512706H ↗
15. Yoshida M, Prasad PN (1996) Chem Mater 8:235. https://doi.org/10.1021/cm950331o10.1021/cm950331o ↗
16. Kordas G, Wu K, Brahme US, Friedmann TA, Ginsberg DM (1987) Mater Lett 5:417. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-577X(87)90053-X10.1016/0167-577X(87)90053-X ↗
17. Wu S, Li F, Wu Y, Xu R, Li G (2010) Chem Comm 46:1694. https://doi.org/10.1039/B925296G10.1039/B925296G ↗
18. Rahman IA, Padavettan V (2012) J Nanomater 2012:132424. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/13242410.1155/2012/132424 ↗
19. Kumar A, Gaurav, Malik AK, Tewary DK, Singh B (2008) Anal Chim Acta 610:1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2008.01.02810.1016/j.aca.2008.01.028 ↗
20. Naudin G, Ceratti DR, Faustini M (2017) Sol-gel derived functional coatings for optics. in: advances in sol-gel derived materials and technologies. Springer International Publishing, p. 61. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50144-4_310.1007/978-3-319-50144-4_3 ↗
21. Ciriminna R, Fidalgo A, Pandarus V, Béland F, Ilharco LM, Pagliaro M (2013) Chem Rev 113:6592. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr300399c10.1021/cr300399c ↗
22. Pirzada T, Arvidson SA, Saquing CD, Shah SS, Khan SA (2012) Langmuir 28:5834. https://doi.org/10.1021/la300049j10.1021/la300049j ↗
23. Xu Y, Zhou W, Zhang L, Cheng L (2000) J Mater Process Technol 101:44. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(99)00450-110.1016/S0924-0136(99)00450-1 ↗
24. Shao C, Kim H-Y, Gong J, Ding B, Lee D-R, Park S-J (2003) Mater Lett 57:1579. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-577X(02)01036-410.1016/S0167-577X(02)01036-4 ↗
25. Bi L, Wang J-w, Chen F, Fu Q (2013) Chin J Polym Sci 31:1546. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10118-013-1345-110.1007/s10118-013-1345-1 ↗
26. Jia Y-T, Gong J, Gu X-H, Kim H-Y, Dong J, Shen X-Y (2007) Carbohydr Polym 67:403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2006.06.01010.1016/j.carbpol.2006.06.010 ↗
27. Wang H, Lu X, Zhao Y, Wang C (2006) Mater Lett 60:2480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2006.01.02110.1016/j.matlet.2006.01.021 ↗
28. Pérez-Padilla Y, Medina Cetina SA, Ávila-Ortega A, Barrón-Zambrano JA, Vilchis-Néstor AR, Carrera-Figueiras C, Muñoz-Rodríguez D (2018) J Mex Chem Soc 62:348. https://doi.org/10.29356/jmcs.v62i2.43110.29356/jmcs.v62i2.431 ↗
29. Burgos-Tan MJ, Pérez-Padilla Y, Avila-Ortega A, Barrón-Zambrano JA, Vilchis-Néstor AR, Carrera-Figueiras C, Muñoz-Rodríguez D (2017) Chem Pap 71:1205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11696-016-0113-410.1007/s11696-016-0113-4 ↗
30. Muñoz-Rodríguez D, Pérez-Padilla Y, Ávila-Ortega A, Barrón-Zambrano JA, Carrera-Figueiras C (2021) J Coat Technol Res https://doi.org/10.1007/s11998-021-00471-310.1007/s11998-021-00471-3 ↗
31. Irani M, Keshtkar AR, Moosavian MA (2012) Chem Eng J 200-202:192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2012.06.05410.1016/j.cej.2012.06.054 ↗
32. Shao C, Guan H, Liu Y, Gong J, Yu N, Yang X (2004) J Cryst Growth 267:380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2004.03.06510.1016/j.jcrysgro.2004.03.065 ↗
33. Bange JP, Patil LS, Gautan DK (2008) Prog Electromagn Res M 3:165. https://doi.org/10.2528/PIERM0806040110.2528/PIERM08060401 ↗
34. Babonneau F, Thorne K, Mackenzie JD (1989) Chem Mater 1:554. https://doi.org/10.1021/cm00005a01710.1021/cm00005a017 ↗
35. Cui X, Zhu G, Pan Y, Shao Q, Zhao C, Dong M, Zhang Y, Guo Z (2018) Polymer 138:203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2018.01.06310.1016/j.polymer.2018.01.063 ↗
36. Ávila-Martínez MA, Pérez-Padilla Y, Medina-Peralta S, Ávila-Ortega A, Muñoz-Rodríguez D (2021) J Coat Technol Res https://doi.org/10.1007/s11998-021-00462-410.1007/s11998-021-00462-4 ↗
37. Yang N (2008) Phys Can 64:141
38. Lee JS, Choi KH, Ghim HD, Kim SS, Chun DH, Kim HY, Lyoo WS (2004) J Appl Polym Sci 93:1638. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.2060210.1002/app.20602 ↗
39. De Vrieze S, Van Camp T, Nelvig A, Hagström B, Westbroek P, De Clerck K (2009) J Mater Sci 44:1357. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-008-3010-610.1007/s10853-008-3010-6 ↗
40. Andrady AL (2007) Electrospinning basics. in: science and technology of polymer nanofibers. p. 55. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470229842.ch310.1002/9780470229842.ch3 ↗
41. Li D, Wang Y, Xia Y (2003) Nano Lett 3:1167. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl034425610.1021/nl0344256 ↗