journal article·2013-05

The strength of binary junctions in hexagonal close-packed crystals

C.-C. Wu, P.W. Chung, S. Aubry, L.B. Munday, A. Arsenlis

Acta Materialia· Volume 61· Issue 9
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract A comparative study of non-coplanar binary dislocation junctions in magnesium (Mg) and beryllium (Be) is presented to examine the effects of elastic properties and active Burgers vectors on junction formation and destruction in hexagonal close-packed (hcp) crystals via discrete dislocation dynamics simulations. Two junction configurations formed at intersecting prismatic ( 0 1 1 ¯ 0 ) / basal ( 0 0 0 1 ) planes and type-II pyramidal ( 2 ¯ 1 1 2 ) / prismatic ( 0 1 1 ¯ 0 ) planes are studied using Burgers vectors of varying magnitudes. The equilibrium junctions are created from two intersecting straight gliding dislocations, and their subsequent strengths are evaluated under uniform applied stresses. The relative junction strengths between Mg and Be are consistent with their relative elastic stiffness, i.e., the modulus of elasticity for Mg is approximately one order of magnitude smaller than that of Be, and their junction strengths are similarly one order of magnitude apart. In general, the yield surfaces for junctions in Be are larger than those in Mg after normalization with the respective elastic moduli and Poisson’s ratios. All yield surfaces exhibit a strong symmetry. However, the size and shape of the yield surfaces depend on the slip systems, especially the active Burgers vectors. The yield surfaces of hcp crystals can resemble those of face-centered cubic or body-centered cubic crystals when the active Burgers vectors of the dislocations involved in the junction are of type 〈a〉, namely 1 3 〈 1 1 2 ¯ 0 〉 , and are distinct when Burgers vectors of different types are used: for instance, a type 〈a + c〉, namely 1 3 〈 1 1 2 ¯ 3 ¯ 〉 , interacting with a type 〈a〉. It was also found that junctions with more edge part exhibit more elongated yield surfaces than those with more screw part, and slip systems involved with 〈a〉 Burgers vectors result in smaller yield surfaces. These results demonstrate that junction strengths for hcp crystals are largely determined by elastic properties and Burgers vectors. The work aims to assess the effects of intrinsic material properties and dislocation slip systems on the strength of different binary dislocation junctions for general hcp structures.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and mechanical properties · Magnesium Alloys: Properties and Applications · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (45)

Show source-provided references
1. Hirth · 1982
2. Weertman · 1992
3. Hirth · J Appl Phys · 1961 · 32 · 70010.1063/1.1736074 ↗
4. Devincre · Modelling Simul Mater Sci Eng · 1994 · 2 · 55910.1088/0965-0393/2/3A/010 ↗
5. Lee · Int J Plast · 2010 · 26 · 92510.1016/j.ijplas.2009.11.004 ↗
6. Schoeck · Phys Stat Sol (b) · 1972 · 53 · 66110.1002/pssb.2220530227 ↗
7. Madec · Science · 2003 · 301 · 187910.1126/science.1085477 ↗
8. Friedel · 1964
9. Bulatov · Nature · 1998 · 391 · 66910.1038/35577 ↗
10. Bulatov · Nature · 2006 · 440 · 117410.1038/nature04658 ↗
11. Dupuy · Acta Mater · 2002 · 50 · 487310.1016/S1359-6454(02)00356-7 ↗
12. Zhou · Science · 1998 · 279 · 152510.1126/science.279.5356.1525 ↗
13. Zhou · Physica D · 1999 · 133 · 49810.1016/S0167-2789(99)00074-3 ↗
14. Rodney · Phys Rev Lett · 1999 · 82 · 170410.1103/PhysRevLett.82.1704 ↗
15. Zbib · J Nucl Mater · 2000 · 276 · 15410.1016/S0022-3115(99)00175-0 ↗
16. Madec · Comput Mater Sci · 2002 · 23 · 21910.1016/S0927-0256(01)00215-4 ↗
17. Lee · Modelling Simul Mater Sci Eng · 2011 · 19 · 02500210.1088/0965-0393/19/2/025002 ↗
18. Wickham · Phys Rev Lett · 1999 · 83 · 457410.1103/PhysRevLett.83.4574 ↗
19. Shenoy · Phys Rev Lett · 2000 · 84 · 149110.1103/PhysRevLett.84.1491 ↗
20. Motz · Acta Mater · 2009 · 57 · 174410.1016/j.actamat.2008.12.020 ↗
21. Carrez · Mater Sci Eng A · 2005 · 400–401 · 32510.1016/j.msea.2005.03.071 ↗
22. Capolungo · Acta Mater · 2011 · 59 · 290910.1016/j.actamat.2011.01.026 ↗
23. Monnet · Acta Mater · 2004 · 52 · 431710.1016/j.actamat.2004.05.048 ↗
24. Yoo · Mater Sci Eng A · 2001 · 319–321 · 8710.1016/S0921-5093(01)01027-9 ↗
25. Kim · Mater Sci Eng A · 2011 · 528 · 541110.1016/j.msea.2011.02.082 ↗
26. Balogh · Mater Sci Eng A · 2010 · 528 · 53310.1016/j.msea.2010.09.048 ↗
27. Kuwano · Phys Stat Sol (c) · 2003 · 244410.1002/pssc.200303517 ↗
28. Bai · Appl Phys Lett · 2007 · 91 · 13190310.1063/1.2790813 ↗
29. Wu · J Cryst Growth · 1998 · 189–190 · 23110.1016/S0022-0248(98)00240-1 ↗
30. Newnham · 2005
31. Hull · 1984
32. Osipiyan · J Phys Chem Solids · 1971 · 32 · 152110.1016/S0022-3697(71)80046-X ↗
33. Arsenlis · Modelling Simul Mater Sci Eng · 2007 · 15 · 55310.1088/0965-0393/15/6/001 ↗
34. Damiano · Trans Metall Soc AIME · 1963 · 227 · 788
35. Zwillinger D. (Editor in Chief). CRC standard mathematical tables and formulae, 30th ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2011 [chapter 2].10.1201/b10980 ↗
36. Capolungo · Modelling Simul Mater Sci Eng · 2010 · 18 · 08500210.1088/0965-0393/18/8/085002 ↗
37. Wu · Mater Res Soc Symp Proc · 2012 · 142410.1557/opl.2012.234 ↗
38. Tadmor · 2012
39. Martinez · J Mech Phys Sol · 2008 · 56 · 86910.1016/j.jmps.2007.06.014 ↗
40. deWit · Phys Rev · 1959 · 116 · 111310.1103/PhysRev.116.1113 ↗
41. Frank · Phys Rev · 1950 · 79 · 72210.1103/PhysRev.79.722 ↗
42. Dash · J Appl Phys · 1956 · 27 · 119310.1063/1.1722229 ↗
43. Hirth · 1982
44. Grinberg · Russ Phys J · 2011 · 54 · 90610.1007/s11182-011-9698-9 ↗
45. Hirth · 1982