Residual elastic strain induced by equal channel angular pressing on bulk metallic glasses
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract We performed equal channel angular pressing (ECAP) on bulk metallic glasses with the composition of (La0.5Ce0.5)65Co25Al10 and Zr52.5Cu17.9Ni14.6Al10Ti5. The analysis of the high energy X-ray diffraction patterns indicates that anisotropic strain is present in the processed samples. We also determined the nature and magnitude of strain in the sample after thermo-mechanical creep, i.e. after homogenous deformation. Comparison between diffraction patterns indicates that the strain anisotropy in the ECAP processed samples is due to an elastic strain and is not induced by bond anisotropy as in creep samples. We conclude that the apparent elastic strain is brought on by a residual stress originating from the shear bands and that the deformation in ECAP experiment is inherently inhomogeneous.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metallic Glasses and Amorphous Alloys · Microstructure and mechanical properties · Magnetic properties of thin films
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (35)
Show source-provided references
1. Spaepen · Acta Metall · 1977 · 25 · 40710.1016/0001-6160(77)90232-2 ↗
2. Homer · Scripta Metall · 1980 · 14 · 133110.1016/0036-9748(80)90188-X ↗
3. Kawamura · Scripta Mater · 1998 · 39 · 30110.1016/S1359-6462(98)00163-8 ↗
4. Lu · Acta Mater · 2003 · 51 · 342910.1016/S1359-6454(03)00164-2 ↗
5. Shen · Intermetallics · 2005 · 13 · 7910.1016/j.intermet.2004.06.008 ↗
6. Schroers · Phys Rev Lett · 2004 · 93 · 25550610.1103/PhysRevLett.93.255506 ↗
7. Novikov · Nature · 2004 · 431 · 96110.1038/nature02947 ↗
8. Lewandowski · Philos Mag Lett · 2005 · 85 · 7710.1080/09500830500080474 ↗
9. Alpas · Scripta Metall · 1988 · 22 · 26510.1016/S0036-9748(88)80346-6 ↗
10. Choi-Yim · Acta Mater · 1999 · 47 · 245510.1016/S1359-6454(99)00103-2 ↗
11. Hays · Phys Rev Lett · 2000 · 84 · 290110.1103/PhysRevLett.84.2901 ↗
12. Zhang · Nat Mater · 2006 · 5 · 85710.1038/nmat1758 ↗
13. Chen · Appl Phys Lett · 1976 · 29 · 32810.1063/1.89084 ↗
14. Peker · Appl Phys Lett · 1993 · 63 · 234210.1063/1.110520 ↗
15. Lee · Scripta Mater · 2008 · 59 · 80210.1016/j.scriptamat.2008.05.049 ↗
16. Iwahashi · Scripta Mater · 1996 · 35 · 14310.1016/1359-6462(96)00107-8 ↗
17. Furukawa · J Mater Sci · 2001 · 36 · 283510.1023/A:1017932417043 ↗
18. Valiev · Nat Mater · 2004 · 3 · 51110.1038/nmat1180 ↗
19. Valiev · Prog Mater Sci · 2006 · 51 · 88110.1016/j.pmatsci.2006.02.003 ↗
20. Yokoyama · Mater Trans · 2002 · 43 · 231610.2320/matertrans.43.2316 ↗
21. Hammersley · Nucl Instrum Methods A · 1994 · 346 · 31210.1016/0168-9002(94)90720-X ↗
22. Poulsen · Nat Mater · 2005 · 4 · 3310.1038/nmat1266 ↗
23. Hufnagel · Phys Rev B · 2006 · 73 · 06420410.1103/PhysRevB.73.064204 ↗
24. Mear · Philos Mag Lett · 2008 · 88 · 75710.1080/09500830802235776 ↗
25. Suzuki · Phys Rev B · 1987 · 35 · 216210.1103/PhysRevB.35.2162 ↗
26. Dmowski · J Mater Res · 2007 · 22 · 41210.1557/jmr.2007.0043 ↗
27. Dmowski · Adv Eng Mater · 2008 · 10 · 100310.1002/adem.200800121 ↗
28. Dmowski · Phys Rev Lett · 2010 · 105 · 20550210.1103/PhysRevLett.105.205502 ↗
29. Geng · Mater Sci Eng A · 2004 · 373 · 22910.1016/j.msea.2004.01.047 ↗
30. Schuh · Acta Mater · 2007 · 55 · 406710.1016/j.actamat.2007.01.052 ↗
31. Lu · J Mater Res · 2003 · 18 · 203910.1557/JMR.2003.0287 ↗
32. Zhang · Philos Mag Lett · 2005 · 85 · 51310.1080/09500830500395237 ↗
33. Bei · Phys Rev Lett · 2006 · 96 · 10550310.1103/PhysRevLett.96.105503 ↗
34. Sun · Appl Phys Lett · 2011 · 98 · 20190210.1063/1.3592249 ↗
35. Mughrabi · Philos Mag A · 1986 · 53 · 79310.1080/01418618608245293 ↗