journal article·2018-04

Synthesis of novel nanostructured bredigite–amoxicillin scaffolds for bone defect treatment: cytocompatibility and antibacterial activity

H. R. Bakhsheshi-Rad, E. Hamzah, N. Abbasizadeh, A. Najafinezhad, M. Kashefian

Publisher page

Abstract

Bone infections in human beings are an essentially destructive problem with crucial clinical and economic effects; thus, incorporation of antibiotics such as amoxicillin (AMX) into the scaffold was developed as an effective treatment for bone infections. In this respect, we develop new nanostructured bredigite (Bre; Ca7MgSi4O16)–amoxicillin (AMX; α-amino-hydroxybenzyl-penicillin) scaffolds containing different concentrations of amoxicillin (0, 3, 5, and 10%) by using space holder method to assure bactericidal properties. The result depicted that the Bre–AMX scaffolds possess porosity of 80–82% with high compressive strength of 1.2–1.4 MPa and controlled antibiotic release for prevention of infection. Bre–(3–10%)AMX scaffolds were able to destroy Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) and Escherichia coli (E. coli) bacteria, as well as effectively inhibit the growth of bacterial cells; in addition, the antibacterial activity of the AMX-loaded scaffolds augmented with the increase of the AMX concentration. Sustained drug release was detected from Bre–AMX scaffolds accompanied by initial burst release of 20% for 8 h, followed by a sustained release, which is favorable for bone infection treatment. These new Bre–(3–5%)AMX scaffolds possess excellent mechanical properties and antibacterial activity with no cytotoxicity suggested as an appropriate alternative for bone infection treatment.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Orthopedic Infections and Treatments · Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (41)

Show source-provided references
1. Sadeghzade S, Shamoradi F et al. (2017) Fabrication and characterization of baghdadite anostructured scaffolds by space holder method. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 68:1–710.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.01.034 ↗
2. Kariem H, Pastrama M-I et al. (2015) Micro-poro-elasticity of baghdadite-based bone tissue engineering scaffolds: a unifying approach based on ultrasonics, nanoindentation, and homogenization theory. Mater Sci Eng C 46:553–56410.1016/j.msec.2014.10.072 ↗
3. Roohani-Esfahani S-I, Chen Y et al. (2013) Fabrication and characterization of a new, strong and bioactive ceramic scaffold for bone regeneration. Mater Lett 107:378–38110.1016/j.matlet.2013.06.046 ↗
4. Eilbagi M, Emadi R et al. (2016) Mechanical and cytotoxicity evaluation of nanostructured hydroxyapatite-bredigite scaffolds for bone regeneration. Mater Sci Eng C 68:603–61210.1016/j.msec.2016.06.030 ↗
5. Zreiqat H, Ramaswamy Y et al. (2010) The incorporation of strontium and zinc into a calcium–silicon ceramic for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials 31:3175–318410.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.01.024 ↗
6. Olalde B, Garmendia N et al. (2013) Multifunctional bioactive glass scaffolds coated with layers of poly(d,l-lactide-co-glycolide) and poly(n-isopropylacrylamide-co-acrylic acid) microgels loaded with vancomycin. Mater Sci Eng C 33:3760–376710.1016/j.msec.2013.05.002 ↗
7. Schumacher TC, Volkmann E et al. (2014) Mechanical evaluation of calcium-zirconium-silicate (baghdadite) obtained by a direct solid-state synthesis route. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 34:294–30110.1016/j.jmbbm.2014.02.021 ↗
8. Zhai W, Lu H et al. (2013) Stimulatory effects of the ionic products from Ca–Mg–Si bioceramics on both osteogenesis and angiogenesis in vitro. Acta Biomater 9:8004–801410.1016/j.actbio.2013.04.024 ↗
9. Diba M, Goudouri O-M et al. (2014) Magnesium-containing bioactive polycrystalline silicate-based ceramics and glass-ceramics for biomedical applications. Curr Opin Solid State Mater Sci 18:147–16710.1016/j.cossms.2014.02.004 ↗
10. Tavangarian F, Emadi R (2011) Mechanism of nanostructure bredigite formation by mechanical activation with thermal treatment. Mater Lett 65:2354–235610.1016/j.matlet.2011.04.108 ↗
11. Antoci JV, Adams CS et al. (2008) The inhibition of Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilm formation by vancomycin-modified titanium alloy and implications for the treatment of periprosthetic infection. Biomaterials 29:4684–469010.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.08.016 ↗
12. Rumian Ł, Tiainen H et al. (2017) Ceramic scaffolds with immobilized vancomycin-loaded poly(lactide-co-glycolide) microparticles for bone defects treatment. Mater Lett 190:67–7010.1016/j.matlet.2016.12.113 ↗
13. García-Alvarez R, Izquierdo-Barba I et al. (2017) 3D scaffold with effective multidrug sequential release against bacteria biofilm. Acta Biomater 49:113–12610.1016/j.actbio.2016.11.028 ↗
14. Parent M, Magnaudeix A et al. (2016) Hydroxyapatite microporous bioceramics as vancomycin reservoir: antibacterial efficiency and biocompatibility investigation. J Biomater Appl 31:488–49810.1177/0885328216653108 ↗
15. Wang S, Zheng F et al. (2012) Encapsulation of amoxicillin within laponite-doped poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) nanofibers: preparation, characterization, and antibacterial activity. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 4:6393–640110.1021/am302130b ↗
16. Songsurang K, Pakdeebumrung J et al. (2011) Sustained release of amoxicillin from ethyl cellulose-coated amoxicillin/chitosan–cyclodextrin-based tablets. AAPS PharmSciTech 12:35–4510.1208/s12249-010-9555-0 ↗
17. Sadeghpoura S, Amirjanib A, Hafezib M, Zamanian N,A (2017) Fabrication of a novel nanostructured calcium zirconium silicate scaffolds prepared by a freeze-casting method for bone tissue engineering. Ceram Int 40:16107–1611410.1016/j.ceramint.2014.07.039 ↗
18. Iviglia G, Cassinelli C et al. (2016) Engineered porous scaffolds for periprosthetic infection prevention. Mater Sci Eng C 68:701–71510.1016/j.msec.2016.06.050 ↗
19. Ghomi H, Emadi R et al. (2016) Fabrication and characterization of nanostructure diopside scaffolds using the space holder method: effect of different space holders and compaction pressures. Mater Des 91:193–20010.1016/j.matdes.2015.11.078 ↗
20. Unnithan AR, Nejad AG et al. (2016) Electrospun zwitterionic nanofibers with in situ decelerated epithelialization property for non-adherent and easy removable wound dressing application. Chem Eng J 287:640–64810.1016/j.cej.2015.11.086 ↗
21. Mirahmadi F, Tafazzoli-Shadpour M et al. (2013) Enhanced mechanical properties of thermosensitive chitosan hydrogel by silk fibers for cartilage tissue engineering. Mater Sci Eng C 33:4786–479410.1016/j.msec.2013.07.043 ↗
22. Williamson GK (1953) X-ray line broadening from filed aluminium and wolfram. Acta Metall 1:22–3110.1016/0001-6160(53)90006-6 ↗
23. Mirhadi SM, Tavangarian F et al. (2012) Synthesis, characterization and formation mechanism of single-phase nanostructure bredigite powder. Mater Sci Eng C 32:133–13910.1016/j.msec.2011.10.007 ↗
24. Sabree I, Gough JE, Derby B (2015) Mechanical properties of porous ceramic scaffolds: influence of internal dimensions. Ceram Int 41:8425–843210.1016/j.ceramint.2015.03.044 ↗
25. Salma-Ancane K, Stipniece L, Putnins A, Berzina-Cimdin L (2015) Development of Mg-containing porous β-tricalcium phosphate scaffolds for bone repair. Ceram Int 41:4996–500410.1016/j.ceramint.2014.12.065 ↗
26. Khodaei M, Meratian M, Savabi O (2015) Effect of spacer type and cold compaction pressure on structural and mechanical properties of porous titanium scaffold. Powder Metall 58:152–15910.1179/1743290115Y.0000000004 ↗
27. Roohani-Esfahani S-I, Nouri-Khorasani S, Lu Z, Appleyard R, Zreiqat H (2010) The influence hydroxyapatite nanoparticle shape and size on the properties of biphasic calcium phosphate scaffolds coated with hydroxyapatite–PCL composites. Biomaterials 31:5498–550910.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.03.058 ↗
28. Wu C, Chang J et al. (2005) Preparation and characteristics of a calcium magnesium silicate (bredigite) bioactive ceramic. Biomaterials 26:2925–293110.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.09.019 ↗
29. Lopes JH, Magalhães JA, Gouveia RF, Bertran CA, Motisuke M, Camargo SEA, Trichês EdS (2016) Hierarchical structures of β-TCP/45S5 bioglass hybrid scaffolds prepared by gelcasting J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 62:10–2310.1016/j.jmbbm.2016.04.028 ↗
30. Salim MM, Malek NANN (2016) Characterization and antibacterial activity of silver exchanged regenerated NaY zeolite from surfactant-modified NaY zeolite. Mater Sci Eng C 59:70–7710.1016/j.msec.2015.09.099 ↗
31. Sangeetha K, Yokogawa Y, Girija EK (2015) A facile strategy to elute amoxicillin in a controlled way from hydroxyapatite-gelatin composite. Adv Mater Lett 6:1031–103610.5185/amlett.2015.5905 ↗
32. Zheng F, Wang S et al. (2013) Characterization and antibacterial activity of amoxicillin-loaded electrospun nano-hydroxyapatite/poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) composite nanofibers. Biomaterials 34:1402–141210.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.10.071 ↗
33. Furtos G, Rivero G, Rapuntean S, Abraham GA (2017) Amoxicillin-loaded electrospun nanocomposite membranes for dental applications. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 105:966–97610.1002/jbm.b.33629 ↗
34. Diba M, Kharaziha M et al. (2012) Preparation and characterization of polycaprolactone/forsterite nanocomposite porous scaffolds designed for bone tissue regeneration. Compos Sci Technol 72:716–72310.1016/j.compscitech.2012.01.023 ↗
35. Wang S, Castro R et al. (2012) Electrospun laponite-doped poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid) nanofibers for osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells. J Mater Chem 22:23357–2336710.1039/c2jm34249a ↗
36. Ghadiri S, Hassanzadeh-Tabrizi SA, Bigham A (2017) The effect of synthesis medium on structure and drug delivery behavior of CTAB-assisted sol–gel derived nanoporous calcium–magnesium–silicate. J Sol Gel Sci Technol 83:229–23610.1007/s10971-017-4404-1 ↗
37. Vassilakopoulou A, Dimos K, Kostas V, Karakassides MA, Koutselas I (2016) Synthesis and characterization of calcium oxyboroapatite with bimodal porosity. J Sol Gel Sci Technol 78:339–34610.1007/s10971-016-3964-9 ↗
38. Hendrikx S, Kuzmenka D, Köferstein R et al. (2017) Effects of curing and organic content on bioactivity and mechanical properties of hybrid sol–gel glass scaffolds made by indirect rapid prototyping. J Sol Gel Sci Technol 83:143–15410.1007/s10971-017-4395-y ↗
39. Ghomi H, Fathi MH, Edris H (2011) Preparation of nanostructure hydroxyapatite scaffold for tissue engineering applications. J Sol Gel Sci Technol 58:642–65010.1007/s10971-011-2439-2 ↗
40. Bakhsheshi-Rad HR, Hamzah E, Ismail AF, Aziz M, Daroonparvar M, Saebnoori E, Chami A (2018) In vitro degradation behavior, antibacterial activity and cytotoxicity of TiO2 -MAO/ZnHA composite coating on Mg alloy for orthopedic implants. Surf Coat Technol 334:450–46010.1016/j.surfcoat.2017.11.027 ↗
41. Bakhsheshi-Rad HR, Hamzah E, Tok HY, Kasiri-Asgaran M, Jabbarzare S, Medraj M (2017) Microstructure, In Vitro Corrosion Behavior and Cytotoxicity of Biodegradable Mg-Ca-Zn and Mg-Ca-Zn-Bi Alloys. J Mater Eng Perform 26:653–66610.1007/s11665-016-2499-0 ↗