Life cycle assessment of aerogels: a critical review
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Over the past decade, the increasing emphasis on sustainable material production has brought aerogel technology to the forefront of scientific and industrial research. Aerogels are known for their extraordinary properties, such as high porosity and low density, which make them suitable for a wide range of applications from thermal insulation in buildings to drug delivery systems. This review systematically investigates the sustainability of aerogel production by analyzing the environmental impacts identified in recent life cycle assessments (LCAs). It examines studies on aerogel production using different precursors, solvents, and energy-intensive production methods, especially drying techniques, providing a comprehensive analysis of the environmental footprints and highlighting several hotspots. The review particularly focuses on identifying the disparities in LCA methodologies and the results obtained, which are crucial for crafting a roadmap toward more sustainable aerogel production. The findings emphasize the need for standardized functional units and lifecycle phases that reflect the specific applications of aerogels, thus enabling more accurate comparisons and assessments. The review concludes with a discussion of the critical gaps in current LCA studies of aerogels. It also offers sustainability recommendations based on identified hotspots, advocating for improvements in aerogel production techniques that minimize environmental impacts, enhance material efficiency, and reduce waste. By addressing these gaps, this paper aims to foster a deeper understanding of aerogel sustainability and encourage the development of more environmentally friendly practices in aerogel production and application. Graphical Abstract
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Aerogels and thermal insulation · Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity · Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Aegerter MA, Prassas M (2011) Aerogel Handbooks, Advances in Sol-Gel Derived Materials and Technologies. New York
2. Michaloudis I, Papachristopoulou K, El-Zein F et al. (2023) (M)other tongue: the optic and haptic scale for restAURAtion works made of silica aerogel. J Solgel Sci Technol 106:480–494. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10971-022-05987-710.1007/s10971-022-05987-7 ↗
3. Betz M, García-González CA, Subrahmanyam RP et al. (2012) Preparation of novel whey protein-based aerogels as drug carriers for life science applications. J Supercrit Fluids 72:111–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.supflu.2012.08.01910.1016/j.supflu.2012.08.019 ↗
4. Duarte ARC, Santo VE, Alves A et al. (2013) Unleashing the potential of supercritical fluids for polymer processing in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. J Supercrit Fluids 79:177–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.supflu.2013.01.00410.1016/j.supflu.2013.01.004 ↗
5. Horvat G, Xhanari K, Finšgar M et al. (2017) Novel ethanol-induced pectin–xanthan aerogel coatings for orthopedic applications. Carbohydr Polym 166:365–376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.03.00810.1016/j.carbpol.2017.03.008 ↗
6. Guo X, Xu D, Zhao Y et al. (2019) Electroassembly of chitin nanoparticles to construct freestanding hydrogels and high porous aerogels for wound healing. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 11:34766–34776. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.9b1306310.1021/acsami.9b13063 ↗
7. Basak S, Singhal RS (2023) The potential of supercritical drying as a “green” method for the production of food-grade bioaerogels: a comprehensive critical review. Food Hydrocoll 141:108738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2023.10873810.1016/j.foodhyd.2023.108738 ↗
8. Almaqtari FA, Elsheikh T, Al-Hattami HM, Mishra N (2023) The impact of board characteristics on environmentally friendly production: A cross country study in Asia and Europe. J Clean Prod 392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.13625710.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136257 ↗
9. Ghodrati B, Al-Chalabi H, Hoseinie H (2016) Environment-friendly manufacturing and support-Issues and challenges. The 3rd International Conference on Application of Materials Science and Environmental Materials (AMSEM2015). https://doi.org/10.1142/9789813141124_002310.1142/9789813141124_0023 ↗
10. ISO-14044 (2006) International Organization for Standardization, Environmental Management - Life Cycle Assessement - Requirements and Guidelines International Organization for Standardization (2006)
11. Kloepffer W (2008) Life cycle sustainability assessment of products (with Comments by Helias A. Udo de Haes, p. 95). Int J Life Cycle Assess 13:89–95. https://doi.org/10.1065/LCA2008.02.376/METRICS10.1065/LCA2008.02.376/METRICS ↗
12. Guinée JB, Heijungs R, Huppes G et al. (2011) Life cycle assessment: past, present, and future. Environ Sci Technol 45:90–96. 10.1021/ES101316V/ASSET/IMAGES/LARGE/ES-2010-01316V_0003.JPEG10.1021/es101316v ↗
13. Hetherington AC, Borrion AL, Griffiths OG, McManus MC (2014) Use of LCA as a development tool within early research: challenges and issues across different sectors. Int J Life Cycle Assess 19:130–143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-013-0627-810.1007/s11367-013-0627-8 ↗
14. Zhang Y, Yuan K, Magagnin L, et al. (2023) Schiff base functionalized silica aerogels for enhanced removal of Pb (II) and Cu (II): Performances, DFT calculations and LCA analysis. Chem Eng J 462 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2023.14201910.1016/j.cej.2023.142019 ↗
15. Zhang Y, Yuan K, Magagnin L, et al. (2023) Selective adsorption of Pb (II) and Cu (II) on mercapto-functionalized aerogels: Experiments, DFT studies and LCA analysis. J Clean Prod 393 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.13612610.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136126 ↗
16. Zhang Y, Magagnin L, Yuan K, et al. (2022) Highly-efficient removal of Pb (II) from water by mesoporous amino functionalized silica aerogels: Experimental, DFT investigations and Life Cycle Assessment. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 345 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2022.11228010.1016/j.micromeso.2022.112280 ↗
17. Zhang Y, Jia S, Yuan X, et al. (2024) High-efficiency removal of Pb (II) and Cu (II) by amidoxime functionalized silica aerogels: Preparation, adsorption mechanisms and environmental impacts analysis. Sep Purif Technol 335 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2023.12607910.1016/j.seppur.2023.126079 ↗
18. Pinto I, Silvestre JD, de Brito J, Júlio MF (2020) Environmental impact of the subcritical production of silica aerogels. J Clean Prod 252 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.11969610.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119696 ↗
19. Parascanu MM, Esteban-Arranz A, de la Osa AR et al. (2021) Comparison of nanoclay/polyvinyl alcohol aerogels scale production: Life Cycle Assessment. Chem Eng Res Des 176:243–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2021.10.00710.1016/j.cherd.2021.10.007 ↗
20. Cao M, Liu F, Huo X, et al. (2024) Producing naturally degradable room-temperature phosphorescent materials by covalently attaching lignin to natural polymers. Cell Rep Phys Sci 5 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xcrp.2024.10181110.1016/j.xcrp.2024.101811 ↗
21. S-P-00725 EPD Spaceloft® Aerogel Insulation. (2015) The International EPD System. https://api.environdec.com/api/v1/EPDLibrary/Files/91888f8a-6f61-4785-80d9-5f7d6cf90827/Data. Accessed 01 Jan 2024
22. EPD Fixit 222 Aerogel High Performance Insulating Plaster (2022) Institut Bauen und Umwelt e.V. https://epd-online.com/EmbeddedEpdList/Detail?id=15566. Accessed 01 Jan 2024
23. De Marco I, Iannone R, Miranda S, Riemma S (2018) An environmental study on starch aerogel for drug delivery applications: effect of plant scale-up. Int J Life Cycle Assess 23:1228–1239. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-017-1351-610.1007/s11367-017-1351-6 ↗
24. De Marco I, Riemma S, Iannone R (2017) LCA of aerogel production using supercritical gel drying: from bench scale to industrial scale. Chem Eng Trans 57:241–246. https://doi.org/10.3303/CET175704110.3303/CET1757041 ↗
25. Jiang Z, Zou Y, Li Y et al. (2021) Environmental life cycle assessment of supercapacitor electrode production using algae derived biochar aerogel. Biochar 3:701–714. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42773-021-00122-110.1007/s42773-021-00122-1 ↗
26. Sun X, Yu Q, Wang F, et al. (2024) Sustainable lignocellulose aerogel for air purifier with thermal insulation, flame retardancy, mechanical strength, and its life cycle assessment. Int J Biol Macromol 257 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.12859910.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.128599 ↗
27. Dowson M, Grogan M, Birks T et al. (2012) Streamlined life cycle assessment of transparent silica aerogel made by supercritical drying. Appl Energy 97:396–404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2011.11.04710.1016/j.apenergy.2011.11.047 ↗
28. Wang Y, Rasheed R, Jiang F, et al. (2021) Life cycle assessment of a novel biomass-based aerogel material for building insulation. J Building Eng 44 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.10298810.1016/j.jobe.2021.102988 ↗
29. Karatum O, Bhuiya MMH, Carroll MK et al. (2018) Life cycle assessment of aerogel manufacture on small and large scales: weighing the use of advanced materials in oil spill remediation. J Ind Ecol 22:1365–1377. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.1272010.1111/jiec.12720 ↗
30. Huber L, Zhao S, Malfait WJ et al. (2017) Supporting information fast and minimal-solvent production of superinsulating silica aerogel granulate. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 56:4753–4756. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.20170083610.1002/anie.201700836 ↗
31. Dove CA, Bradley FF, Patwardhan SV (2019) A material characterization and embodied energy study of novel clay-alginate composite aerogels. Energy Build 184:88–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.10.04510.1016/j.enbuild.2018.10.045 ↗
32. De Marco I, Riemma S, Iannone R (2020) Tablets containing nimesulide obtained by supercritical impregnation: an LCA study. Chem Eng Trans 79:253–258. https://doi.org/10.3303/CET207904310.3303/CET2079043 ↗
33. De Marco I, Riemma S, Iannone R (2019) Life cycle assessment of supercritical impregnation: starch aerogel+Α-tocopherol tablets. J Supercrit Fluids 143:305–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.supflu.2018.09.00310.1016/j.supflu.2018.09.003 ↗
34. De Marco I, Miranda S, Riemma S, Iannone R (2016) LCA of starch aerogels for biomedical applications. Chem Eng Trans 49:319–324. https://doi.org/10.3303/CET164905410.3303/CET1649054 ↗
35. Peydayesh M, Boschi E, Donat F, Mezzenga R (2024) Gold Recovery from e-waste by food-waste amyloid aerogels. Adv Mater. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20231064210.1002/adma.202310642 ↗
36. Smirnova I, Gurikov P (2018) Aerogel production: current status, research directions, and future opportunities. J Supercrit Fluids 134:228–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.supflu.2017.12.03710.1016/j.supflu.2017.12.037 ↗
37. Wang T, Sun H, Long J et al. (2016) Biobased Poly(furfuryl alcohol)/clay aerogel composite prepared by a freeze-drying process. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 4:2601–2605. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.6b0008910.1021/acssuschemeng.6b00089 ↗
38. Benselfelt T, Wågberg L (2019) Unidirectional swelling of dynamic cellulose nanofibril networks: a platform for tunable hydrogels and aerogels with 3D shapeability. Biomacromolecules 20:2406–2412. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.9b0040110.1021/acs.biomac.9b00401 ↗
39. Liao Y, Pang Z, Pan X (2019) Fabrication and mechanistic study of aerogels directly from whole biomass. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 7:17723–17736. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b0403210.1021/acssuschemeng.9b04032 ↗
40. Zhou T, Cheng X, Pan Y et al. (2019) Mechanical performance and thermal stability of polyvinyl alcohol–cellulose aerogels by freeze drying. Cellulose 26:1747–1755. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-018-2179-310.1007/s10570-018-2179-3 ↗
41. Wang Y, Wu K, Xiao M et al. (2018) Thermal conductivity, structure and mechanical properties of konjac glucomannan/starch based aerogel strengthened by wheat straw. Carbohydr Polym 197:284–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.06.00910.1016/j.carbpol.2018.06.009 ↗
42. Wang Y, Su Y, Wang W et al. (2019) The advances of polysaccharide-based aerogels: preparation and potential application. Carbohydr Polym 226:115242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.11524210.1016/j.carbpol.2019.115242 ↗
43. Zhu F (2019) Starch based aerogels: production, properties and applications. Trends Food Sci Technol 89:1–1010.1016/j.tifs.2019.05.001 ↗
44. Rudaz C, Courson R, Bonnet L et al. (2014) Aeropectin: fully biomass-based mechanically strong and thermal superinsulating aerogel. Biomacromolecules 15:2188–2195. https://doi.org/10.1021/bm500345u10.1021/bm500345u ↗
45. Koopmann AK, Bartschmid T, Hüsing N, Elsaesser MS (2023) Renewable, organic and related carbon aerogel monoliths from the polycondensation of Tannin with 5-(Hydroxymethyl)furfural. J Solgel Sci Technol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10971-022-06015-410.1007/s10971-022-06015-4 ↗
46. Upreti G, Dhingra R, Naidu S, et al. (2015) Life cycle assessment of nanomaterials. In: Green Processes for Nanotechnology: From Inorganic to Bioinspired Nanomaterials. Springer International Publishing, pp 393–40810.1007/978-3-319-15461-9_14 ↗
47. Nizam NUM, Hanafiah MM, Woon KS (2021) A content review of life cycle assessment of nanomaterials: Current practices, challenges, and future prospects. Nanomaterials 11:3324. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano1112332410.3390/nano11123324 ↗
48. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. (2021) The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 372 https://doi.org/10.1136/BMJ.N7110.1136/BMJ.N71 ↗
49. Costa D, Quinteiro P, Dias AC (2019) A systematic review of life cycle sustainability assessment: Current state, methodological challenges, and implementation issues. Sci Total Environ 686:774–787. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2019.05.43510.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2019.05.435 ↗
50. Dantas TET, Soares SR (2022) Systematic literature review on the application of life cycle sustainability assessment in the energy sector. Environ Dev Sustain 24:1583–1615. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10668-021-01559-X/TABLES/1010.1007/S10668-021-01559-X/TABLES/10 ↗
51. Wulf C, Werker J, Ball C, et al. (2019) Review of sustainability assessment approaches based on life cycles. Sustainability 2019 11:5717. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU1120571710.3390/SU11205717 ↗
52. Zimek M, Schober A, Mair C, et al. (2019) The Third Wave of LCA as the “Decade of Consolidation”. Sustainability 2019 11:3283. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU1112328310.3390/SU11123283 ↗
53. Karatum, O (2016). Advanced Aerogel Composites for Oil Remediation and Recovery. Dissertation, Duke University. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/12896
54. Huber L, Zhao S, Malfait WJ et al. (2017) Fast and minimal-solvent production of superinsulating silica aerogel granulate. Angew Chem Int Ed 56:4753–4756. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.20170083610.1002/anie.201700836 ↗
55. ISO-14040 (2006) International Organization for Standardization, Environmental Management - Life Cycle Assessment - Principles and Framework (2006)
56. Ciroth A (2012) Refining the pedigree matrix approach in ecoinvent. https://lca-net.com/files/Pedigree_report_final_May2012.pdf. Accessed 28 June 2024
57. Bussa M, Eisen A, Zollfrank C, Röder H (2019) Life cycle assessment of microalgae products: state of the art and their potential for the production of polylactid acid. J Clean Prod 213:1299–131210.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.048 ↗
58. Füchsl S, Rheude F, Röder H (2022) Life cycle assessment (LCA) of thermal insulation materials: a critical review. Clean Mater 5 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clema.2022.10011910.1016/j.clema.2022.100119 ↗
59. ISO 14044 (2006) Environmental management — Life cycle assessment — Requirements and guidelines. International Standards Organization, ISO, Geneva, Switzerland
60. Wernet G, Bauer C, Steubing B et al. (2016) The ecoinvent database version 3 (part I): overview and methodology. Int J Life Cycle Assess 21:1218–1230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-016-1087-810.1007/s11367-016-1087-8 ↗
61. National_Renewable_Energy_Laboratory/USLCI_Database_Public | LCA Collaboration Server. https://www.lcacommons.gov/lca-collaboration/National_Renewable_Energy_Laboratory/USLCI_Database_Public/datasets. Accessed 2 Jan 2024
62. Plastics Europe Public LCI Database. https://plasticseurope.lca-data.com/. Accessed 2 Jan 2024
63. CML-IA Characterisation Factors - Leiden University. https://www.universiteitleiden.nl/en/research/research-output/science/cml-ia-characterisation-factors. Accessed 2 Jan 2024
64. Jolliet O, Margni M, Charles R, et al. Presemmg a New Meth6d IMPACT 2002+: A New Life Cycle Impact Assessment Methodology
65. R6hrlich M, Mistry M, Martens PN, et al. LCA Case Studies A Method to Calculate the Cumulative Energy Demand (CED) of Lignite Extraction. https://doi.org/10.1065/Ica200010.1065/Ica2000 ↗
66. Carter TR, Parry ML, Harasawa H, Nishioka S (1994) IPCC Technical Guidelines for Assessing Climate Change Impacts and Adaptations. Oxford, London.
67. Huijbregts MAJ ReCiPe (2016) A harmonized life cycle impact assessment method at midpoint and endpoint level Report I: Characterization
68. Bare J (2011) TRACI 2.0: The tool for the reduction and assessment of chemical and other environmental impacts 2.0. Clean Technol Environ Policy 13:687–696. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-010-0338-910.1007/s10098-010-0338-9 ↗
69. SimaPro, PRé Sustainability. https://simapro.com/. Accessed 2 Jan 2024
70. OpenLCA (2006) GreenDelta. https://www.openlca.org/. Accessed 2 Jan 2024
71. Buyle M, Braet J, Audenaert A (2013) Life cycle assessment in the construction sector: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 26:379–38810.1016/j.rser.2013.05.001 ↗
72. Cheng Y, Xia M, Luo F et al. (2016) Effect of surface modification on physical properties of silica aerogels derived from fly ash acid sludge. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp 490:200–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2015.11.05510.1016/j.colsurfa.2015.11.055 ↗
73. Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control Reference Document on Best Available Techniques for the Manufacture of Large Volume Inorganic Chemicals - Solids and Others Industry (2007) European Commission. https://eippcb.jrc.ec.europa.eu/sites/default/files/2019-11/lvic-s_bref_0907.pdf. Accessed 01 Jan 2024
74. Gao X, Yu QL, Lazaro A, Brouwers HJH (2017) Investigation on a green olivine nano-silica source based activator in alkali activated slag-fly ash blends: Reaction kinetics, gel structure and carbon footprint. Cem Concr Res 100:129–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2017.06.00710.1016/j.cemconres.2017.06.007 ↗
75. Fawer M, Concannon M, Rieber W LCA Case Studies LCI for the Production of Sodium Silicate Life Cycle Inventories for the Production of Sodium Silicates
76. Tang Q, Wang T (2005) Preparation of silica aerogel from rice hull ash by supercritical carbon dioxide drying. J Supercrit Fluids 35:91–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.supflu.2004.12.00310.1016/j.supflu.2004.12.003 ↗
77. Li T, Wang T (2008) Preparation of silica aerogel from rice hull ash by drying at atmospheric pressure. Mater Chem Phys 112:398–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2008.05.06610.1016/j.matchemphys.2008.05.066 ↗
78. Nayak JP, Bera J (2009) Preparation of Silica Aerogel by Ambient Pressure Drying Process using Rice Husk Ash as Raw Material. Trans. Indian Ceram. Soc 68:91–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/0371750X.2009.1108216310.1080/0371750X.2009.11082163 ↗
79. Karakuzu B, TEMEL TM, Yücel S, et al. (2016) Effect of acid type and gelation ph on the structural properties of silica aerogels prepared by use of rice hull biosilica. Sigma J Eng & Nat Sci 34:175–182
80. Yücel S, Aydın Sinirlioğlu Z, Karakuzu B et al. (2015) Production, characterization and bioactivity of 46S6 bioactive glass from rice hull ash silica. Adv Mat Res 1120–1121:857–861
81. Abbas N, Khalid HR, Ban G et al. (2019) Silica aerogel derived from rice husk: an aggregate replacer for lightweight and thermally insulating cement-based composites. Constr Build Mater 195:312–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.10.22710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.10.227 ↗
82. Nazriati N, Setyawan H, Affandi S et al. (2014) Using bagasse ash as a silica source when preparing silica aerogels via ambient pressure drying. J Non Cryst Solids 400:6–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2014.04.02710.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2014.04.027 ↗
83. Gao GM, Liu DR, Zou HF et al. (2010) Preparation of silica aerogel from oil shale ash by fluidized bed drying. Powder Technol 197:283–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2009.10.00510.1016/j.powtec.2009.10.005 ↗
84. Shi F, Liu JX, Song K, Wang ZY (2010) Cost-effective synthesis of silica aerogels from fly ash via ambient pressure drying. J Non Cryst Solids 356:2241–2246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2010.08.00510.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2010.08.005 ↗
85. Liu SW, Wei Q, Cui SP et al. (2016) Hydrophobic silica aerogel derived from wheat husk ash by ambient pressure drying. J Solgel Sci Technol 78:60–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10971-015-3928-510.1007/s10971-015-3928-5 ↗
86. Terzioglu P, Temel TM, İkizler BK, Yucel S (2018) Preparation of nanoporous silica aerogel from wheat husk ash by ambient pressure drying process for the adsorptive removal of lead from aqueous solution. J Bioprocess Biotech 08 https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-9821.100031510.4172/2155-9821.1000315 ↗
87. Chen YX, Sepahvand S, Gauvin F, et al. (2021) One-pot synthesis of monolithic silica-cellulose aerogel applying a sustainable sodium silicate precursor. Constr Build Mater 293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12328910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.123289 ↗
88. Antypa D, Vlysidis A, Gkika A, et al. (2022) Life cycle assessment of advanced building materials towards NZEBs. In: E3S Web of Conferences. EDP Sciences10.1051/e3sconf/202234904001 ↗
89. Chen HB, Wang YZ, Sánchez-Soto M, Schiraldi DA (2012) Low flammability, foam-like materials based on ammonium alginate and sodium montmorillonite clay. Polym (Guildf) 53:5825–5831. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2012.10.02910.1016/j.polymer.2012.10.029 ↗
90. Madyan OA, Fan M, Feo L, Hui D (2016) Physical properties of clay aerogel composites: an overview. Compos B Eng 102:29–3710.1016/j.compositesb.2016.06.057 ↗
91. Ohta S-I, Nakazawa H (1995) Porous clay-organic composites: Potential substitutes for polystyrene foam. Appl. Clay Sci 9:425–431. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-1317(95)00003-M10.1016/0169-1317(95)00003-M ↗
92. Somlai LS, Bandi SA, Schiraldi DA, Mathias LJ (2006) Facile processing of clays into: organically-modified aerogels. AIChE J 52:1162–116810.1002/aic.10710 ↗
93. Schiraldi DA, Gawryla MD, Alhassan S (2010) Clay aerogel composite materials. In: 12th International ceramics congress part B. Trans Tech Publications Ltd, pp 147–15110.4028/www.scientific.net/AST.63.147 ↗
94. Meng X, Tian X, Xia Y, Xiong Z (2022) Multifunctional alginate-based carbon aerogels for oil–water mixture and emulsion separation. J Dispers Sci Technol 43:1983–1990. https://doi.org/10.1080/01932691.2021.188409010.1080/01932691.2021.1884090 ↗
95. Deze EG, Papageorgiou SK, Favvas EP, Katsaros FK (2012) Porous alginate aerogel beads for effective and rapid heavy metal sorption from aqueous solutions: effect of porosity in Cu2+ and Cd2+ ion sorption. Chem Eng J 209:537–546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2012.07.13310.1016/j.cej.2012.07.133 ↗
96. Muhammad A, Lee D, Shin Y, Park J (2021) Recent progress in polysaccharide aerogels: Their synthesis, application, and future outlook. Polymers (Basel) 1310.3390/polym13081347 ↗
97. Shapiro L, Cohen S (1997) Novel alginate sponges for cell culture and transplantation. Biomaterials 18:583–590. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(96)00181-010.1016/S0142-9612(96)00181-0 ↗
98. Cheng Y, Lu L, Zhang W et al. (2012) Reinforced low density alginate-based aerogels: preparation, hydrophobic modification and characterization. Carbohydr Polym 88:1093–1099. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.01.07510.1016/j.carbpol.2012.01.075 ↗
99. Cui J, Xi Y, Chen S et al. (2016) Prolifera-green-tide as sustainable source for carbonaceous aerogels with hierarchical pore to achieve multiple energy storage. Adv Funct Mater 26:8487–8495. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.20160393310.1002/adfm.201603933 ↗
100. Gao X, Xing W, Zhou J et al. (2014) Superior capacitive performance of active carbons derived from Enteromorpha prolifera. Electrochim Acta 133:459–466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2014.04.10110.1016/j.electacta.2014.04.101 ↗