journal article·2020-10

Magnetic materials for photocatalytic applications—a review

M. J. Jacinto, L. F. Ferreira, V. C. Silva

Publisher page

Abstract

Photocatalysts have been widely applied in the degradation of organic compounds using visible and ultraviolet radiation. Different synthesis approaches have been developed and optimized to produce efficient, eco-friendly, and inexpensive materials to photo-treat water samples contaminated with dyes, pigments, pesticides, and other organic pollutants. Over the last two decades magnetic materials have emerged as a potential alternative to facilitate catalyst isolation in heterogeneously catalyzed liquid-phase reactions. In this review, we focus on the discussion of several studies including the main synthesis processes and new protocol modifications for the fabrication of magnetic photocatalysts, and their impact on the catalyst morphology, efficiency, and recycling. Emphasis is given on the discussion of the synthesis strategies over last decade to produce photoactive catalysts including single-phase catalysts, composites, Multifunctional metal–organic framework materials, binary and ternary core–shell materials, and yolk–shell photocatalysts.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques · Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications · Advanced Nanomaterials in Catalysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (100+)

Show source-provided references
1. Bahri A (1999) Agricultural reuse of wastewater and global water management. Water Sci Technol 40(4-5):339–34610.2166/wst.1999.0608 ↗
2. Ding H, Wei JS, Zhong N, Gao QY, Xiong HM (2017) Highly efficient red-emitting carbon dots with gram-scale yield for bioimaging. Langmuir 33(44):12635–1264210.1021/acs.langmuir.7b02385 ↗
3. Ye L (2016) BiOX (X = Cl, Br, and I) photocatalysts. In: Semiconductor photocatalysis: materials, mechanisms and applications, p 273.10.5772/62626 ↗
4. Li X, Yu J, Wageh S, Al‐Ghamdi AA, Xie J (2016) Graphene in photocatalysis: a review. Small 12(48):6640–669610.1002/smll.201600382 ↗
5. Liu Y, Li Z, Green M, Just M, Li YY, Chen X (2017) Titanium dioxide nanomaterials for photocatalysis. J Phys D: Appl Phys 50(19):19300310.1088/1361-6463/aa6500 ↗
6. Huang Z, Sun F, Zhang Y et al. (2011) Temperature-assisted photochemical construction of CdS-based ordered porous films with photocatalytic activities on solution surfaces. J Colloid Interface Sci 356(2):783–78910.1016/j.jcis.2011.01.027 ↗
7. Yayapao O, Thongtem T, Phuruangrat A, Thongtem S (2013) Ultrasonic-assisted synthesis of Nd-doped ZnO for photocatalysis. Mater Lett 90:83–8610.1016/j.matlet.2012.09.027 ↗
8. Seifollahi Bazarjani M, Hojamberdiev M, Morita K et al. (2013) Visible light photocatalysis with c-WO3–x/WO3×H2O nanoheterostructures in situ formed in mesoporous polycarbosilane-siloxane polymer. J Am Chem Soc 135(11):4467–447510.1021/ja3126678 ↗
9. Li Z, Meng X, Zhang Z (2018) Recent development on MoS2-based photocatalysis: a review. J Photochem Photobiol C: Photochem Rev 35:39–5510.1016/j.jphotochemrev.2017.12.002 ↗
10. Jin Y, Ou L, Yang H, Fu H (2017) Visible-light-mediated aerobic oxidation of N-alkylpyridinium salts under organic photocatalysis. J Am Chem Soc 139(40):14237–1424310.1021/jacs.7b07883 ↗
11. Kumamoto K, Tsuchibashi K, Pramata AD, Yuasa M, Shimanoe K, Kida T (2017) Visible Light-driven photoenergy storage and photocatalysis using polyoxometallates coupled with a Ru complex. J Phys Chem C 121(25):13515–1352310.1021/acs.jpcc.7b02484 ↗
12. Costa-Coquelard C, Sorgues S, Ruhlmann L (2010) Photocatalysis with polyoxometalates associated to porphyrins under visible light: an application of charge transfer in electrostatic complexes. J Phys Chem A 114(22):6394–640010.1021/jp101261n ↗
13. Zhu YY, Lan G, Fan Y, Veroneau SS, Song Y, Micheroni D, Lin W (2018) Merging photoredox and organometallic catalysts in a metal–organic framework significantly boosts photocatalytic activities. Angew Chem 130(43):14286–1429010.1002/ange.201809493 ↗
14. Zhang L, He Y, Yang X, Yuan H, Du Z, Wu Y (2015) Oxidative carbonylation of phenol to diphenyl carbonate by Pd/MO–MnFe2O4 magnetic catalyst. Chem Eng J 278:129–13310.1016/j.cej.2014.11.096 ↗
15. Jia H, Liu XJ, Chen X, Guan XX, Zheng XC, Liu P (2017) Chitosan-Fe3O4 anchored palladium nanoparticles: an efficiently magnetic catalyst for hydrolytic dehydrogenation of ammonia borane. Int J Hydrog Energy 42(47):28425–2843310.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.09.172 ↗
16. Qiao S, Wang R (2018) Biodiesel production from kitchen lard via transesterification by magnetic solid base catalyst. Pet Coal 60(3):474–482
17. Zanato AFS, Silva VC, Lima DAC, Jacinto MJ (2016) Bimetallic magnetic PtPd-nanoparticles as efficient catalyst for PAH removal from liquid media. Appl Nanosci 7:781–79110.1007/s13204-017-0612-9 ↗
18. Liu P, Liu S, Bian SW (2017) Core–shell-structured Fe3O4/Pd@ZIF-8 catalyst with magnetic recyclability and size selectivity for the hydrogenation of alkenes. J Mater Sci 52(20):12121–121310.1007/s10853-017-1357-2 ↗
19. Guillou N, Gao Q, Forster PM, Chang JS, Noguès M, Park S et al. (2001) Nickel (II) phosphate VSB-5: a magnetic nanoporous hydrogenation catalyst with 24-ring tunnels. Angew Chem Int Ed 40(15):2831–283410.1002/1521-3773(20010803)40:15<2831::AID-ANIE2831>3.0.CO;2-Z ↗
20. Rezaei-Vahidian H, Zarei AR, Soleymani AR (2017) Degradation of nitro-aromatic explosives using recyclable magnetic photocatalyst: catalyst synthesis and process optimization. J Hazard Mater 325:310–31810.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.12.001 ↗
21. Pal B, Sharon M (2000) Preparation of iron oxide thin film by metal organic deposition from Fe (III)-acetylacetonate: a study of photocatalytic properties. Thin Solid Films 379(1–2):83–8810.1016/S0040-6090(00)01547-9 ↗
22. Zhong J, Cao C (2010) Nearly monodisperse hollow Fe2O3 nanoovals: Synthesis, magnetic property and applications in photocatalysis and gas sensors. Sens Actuators B: Chem 145(2):651–65610.1016/j.snb.2010.01.016 ↗
23. Sergeev GB (2002) Size effects in nanochemistry. Ross Khim Zh46(5):22–29
24. Hergt R, Dutz S, Röder M (2008) Effects of size distribution on hysteresis losses of magnetic nanoparticles for hyperthermia. J Phys: Condens Matter 20(38):385214
25. Sharma R, Singhal S (2015) Photodegradation of textile dye using magnetically recyclable heterogeneous spinel ferrites. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 90(5):955–96210.1002/jctb.4409 ↗
26. Tan GQ, Zheng YQ, Miao HY, Xia A, Ren HJ (2012) Controllable microwave hydrothermal synthesis of bismuth ferrites and photocatalytic characterization. J Am Ceram Soc 95(1):280–28910.1111/j.1551-2916.2011.04775.x ↗
27. Meng W, Hu R, Yang J, Du Y, Li J, Wang H (2016) Influence of lanthanum-doping on photocatalytic properties of BiFeO3 for phenol degradation. Chin J Catal 37(8):1283–129210.1016/S1872-2067(16)62449-X ↗
28. Wang X, Lin Y, Ding X, Jiang J (2011) Enhanced visible-light-response photocatalytic activity of bismuth ferrite nanoparticles. J Alloy Compd 509(23):6585–658810.1016/j.jallcom.2011.03.074 ↗
29. Wang W, Li N, Chi Y, Li Y, Yan W, Li X, Shao C (2013) Electrospinning of magnetical bismuth ferrite nanofibers with photocatalytic activity. Ceram Int 39(4):3511–351810.1016/j.ceramint.2012.10.175 ↗
30. Teng CJ, Xie D, Sun MX et al. (2016) Sucrose-templated nanoporous BiFeO3 for promising magnetically recoverable multifunctional environment-purifying applications: adsorption and photocatalysis. RSC Adv 6(72):67550–6755510.1039/C6RA12413E ↗
31. Bharathkumar S, Sakar M, Balakumar S (2015) Versatility of electrospinning in the fabrication of fibrous mat and mesh nanostructures of bismuth ferrite (BiFeO3) and their magnetic and photocatalytic activities. Phys Chem Chem Phys 17(27):17745–1775410.1039/C5CP01640A ↗
32. Kim SH, Jeong JW, Lee JW, Shin SC (2009) Enhancement of saturation magnetization in epitaxial (111) BiFeO3 films by magnetic annealing. Thin Solid Films 517(8):2749–275210.1016/j.tsf.2008.11.111 ↗
33. Zhang W, Wang M, Zhao W, Wang B (2013) Magnetic composite photocatalyst ZnFe2O4/BiVO4: synthesis, characterization, and visible-light photocatalytic activity. Dalton Trans 42(43):15464–1547410.1039/c3dt52068d ↗
34. Hou Y, Li X, Zhao Q, Chen G (2013) ZnFe2O4 multi-porous microbricks/graphene hybrid photocatalyst: facile synthesis, improved activity and photocatalytic mechanism. Appl Catal B: Environ 142:80–8810.1016/j.apcatb.2013.04.062 ↗
35. Cao Y, Jia D, Hu P, Wang R (2013) One-step room-temperature solid-phase synthesis of ZnFe2O4 nanomaterials and its excellent gas-sensing property. Ceram Int 39(3):2989–299410.1016/j.ceramint.2012.09.076 ↗
36. Tabari T, Singh D, Jamali SS (2017) Enhanced photocatalytic activity of mesoporous ZnFe2O4 nanoparticles towards gaseous benzene under visible light irradiation. J Environ Chem Eng 5(1):931–93910.1016/j.jece.2017.01.016 ↗
37. Sun S, Yang X, Zhang Y, Zhang F, Ding J, Bao J, Gao C (2012) Enhanced photocatalytic activity of sponge-like ZnFe2O4 synthesized by solution combustion method. Prog Nat Sci: Mater Int 22(6):639–64310.1016/j.pnsc.2012.11.008 ↗
38. Mehrizadeh H, Niaei A, Tseng HH, Salari D, Khataee A (2017) Synthesis of ZnFe2O4 nanoparticles for photocatalytic removal of toluene from gas phase in the annular reactor. J Photochem Photobiol A: Chem 332:188–19510.1016/j.jphotochem.2016.08.028 ↗
39. Ibhadon AO, Fitzpatrick P (2013) Heterogeneous photocatalysis: recent advances and applications. Catalysts 3(1):189–21810.3390/catal3010189 ↗
40. Song H, Zhu L, Li Y, Lou Z, Xiao M, Ye Z (2015) Preparation of ZnFe2O4 nanostructures and highly efficient visible-light-driven hydrogen generation with the assistance of nanoheterostructures. J Mater Chem A 3(16):8353–836010.1039/C5TA00737B ↗
41. Liu H, Hao H, Xing J, Dong J, Zhang Z, Zheng Z, Zhao K (2016) Enhanced photocatalytic capability of zinc ferrite nanotube arrays decorated with gold nanoparticles for visible light-driven photodegradation of rhodamine B. J Mater Sci 51(12):5872–587910.1007/s10853-016-9888-5 ↗
42. Xiong P, Fu Y, Wang L, Wang X (2012) Multi-walled carbon nanotubes supported nickel ferrite: a magnetically recyclable photocatalyst with high photocatalytic activity on degradation of phenols. Chem Eng J 195:149–15710.1016/j.cej.2012.05.007 ↗
43. Anandan S, Ikuma Y, Niwa K (2010) An overview of semi-conductor photocatalysis: modification of TiO2 nanomaterials. Solid State Phenom 162:239–260.10.4028/www.scientific.net/SSP.162.239 ↗
44. Wang P, Huang B, Dai Y, Whangbo MH (2012) Plasmonic photocatalysts: harvesting visible light with noble metal nanoparticles. Phys Chem Chem Phys 14(28):9813–982510.1039/c2cp40823f ↗
45. Li XZ, Li FB (2001) Study of Au/Au3+-TiO2 photocatalysts toward visible photooxidation for water and wastewater treatment. Environ Sci Technol 35(11):2381–238710.1021/es001752w ↗
46. Jabbari V, Hamadanian M, Shamshiri M, Villagrán D (2016) Band gap and Schottky barrier engineered photocatalyst with promising solar light activity for water remediation. RSC Adv 6(19):15678–1568510.1039/C5RA24096D ↗
47. de Souza ML, dos Santos DP, Corio P (2018) Localized surface plasmon resonance enhanced photocatalysis: an experimental and theoretical mechanistic investigation. RSC Adv 8(50):28753–2876210.1039/C8RA03919D ↗
48. Mondal S, Reyes MEDA, Pal U (2017) Plasmon induced enhanced photocatalytic activity of gold loaded hydroxyapatite nanoparticles for methylene blue degradation under visible light. RSC Adv 7(14):8633–864510.1039/C6RA28640B ↗
49. Roldan MV, Castro Y, Pellegri N, Duran A (2015) Enhanced photocatalytic activity of mesoporous SiO2/TiO2 sol–gel coatings doped with Ag nanoparticles. J Sol–Gel Sci Technol 76(1):180–19410.1007/s10971-015-3765-6 ↗
50. Zhang X, Wang B, Wang X et al. (2015) Preparation of M@BiFeO3 nanocomposites (M = Ag, Au) bowl arrays with enhanced visible light photocatalytic activity. J Am Ceram Soc 98(7):2255–226310.1111/jace.13543 ↗
51. Soltani T, Lee BK (2017) Comparison of benzene and toluene photodegradation under visible light irradiation by Ba-doped BiFeO3 magnetic nanoparticles with fast sonochemical synthesis. Photochem Photobiol Sci 16(1):86–9510.1039/C6PP00212A ↗
52. Wang S, Chen D, Niu F, Zhang N, Qin L, Huang Y (2016) Enhancement in visible light photocatalytic activity of BiFeO3 photocatalysts by Pd cocatalyst. Appl Phys A 122(9):86710.1007/s00339-016-0402-3 ↗
53. Niu F, Chen D, Qin L, Gao T et al. (2015) Synthesis of Pt/BiFeO3 heterostructured photocatalysts for highly efficient visible-light photocatalytic performances. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 143:386–39610.1016/j.solmat.2015.07.008 ↗
54. Cao X, Gu L, Lan X, Zhao C, Yao D, Sheng W (2007) Spinel ZnFe2O4 nanoplates embedded with Ag clusters: preparation, characterization, and photocatalytic application. Mater Chem Phys 106(2–3):175–18010.1016/j.matchemphys.2007.05.033 ↗
55. Zhu Z, Liu F, Zhang H, Zhang J, Han L (2015) Photocatalytic degradation of 4-chlorophenol over ag/MFe2O4 (M = Co, Zn, Cu, and Ni) prepared by a modified chemical co-precipitation method: a comparative study. Rsc Adv 5(68):55499–5551210.1039/C5RA04608D ↗
56. Mosali VSS, Qasim M, Mullamuri B, Chandu B, Das D (2017) Synthesis and characterization of Ag/CoFe2O4/polyaniline nanocomposite for photocatalytic application. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 17(12):8918–892410.1166/jnn.2017.13903 ↗
57. Harish KN, Bhojya Naik HS, Prashanth Kumar PN, Viswanath R (2013) Optical and photocatalytic properties of solar light active Nd-substituted Ni ferrite catalysts: for environmental protection. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 1(9):1143–115310.1021/sc400060z ↗
58. Patil SS, Tamboli MS, Deonikar VG, Umarji GG, Ambekar JD, Kulkarni MV, Patil DR (2015) Magnetically separable Ag3PO4/NiFe2O4 composites with enhanced photocatalytic activity. Dalton Trans 44(47):20426–2043410.1039/C5DT03173G ↗
59. Zeng J, Zeng W, Zeng H (2017) In situ plasmonic Au nanoparticle anchored nickel ferrite: an efficient plasmonic photocatalyst for fluorescein-sensitized hydrogen evolution under visible light irradiation. J Solid State Chem 253:294–30410.1016/j.jssc.2017.06.005 ↗
60. Song XM, Wu JM, Yan M (2009) Photocatalytic degradation of selected dyes by titania thin films with various nanostructures. Thin Solid Films 517(15):4341–434710.1016/j.tsf.2009.02.132 ↗
61. Li CJ, Wang JN, Wang B, Gong JR, Lin Z (2012) A novel magnetically separable TiO2/CoFe2O4 nanofiber with high photocatalytic activity under UV–vis light. Mater Res Bull 47(2):333–33710.1016/j.materresbull.2011.11.012 ↗
62. Fujishima A, Zhang X (2006) Titanium dioxide photocatalysis: present situation and future approaches. Comptes Rendus Chim 9(5–6):750–76010.1016/j.crci.2005.02.055 ↗
63. Haw C, Chiu W, Rahman SA et al. (2016) The design of new magnetic-photocatalyst nanocomposites (CoFe2O4–TiO2) as smart nanomaterials for recyclable-photocatalysis applications. New J Chem 40(2):1124–113610.1039/C5NJ02496J ↗
64. Li Y, Zhang M, Guo M, Wang X (2009) Preparation and properties of a nano TiO2/Fe3O4 composite superparamagnetic photocatalyst. Rare Met 28(5):423–42710.1007/s12598-009-0082-7 ↗
65. Hernández S, Hidalgo D, Sacco A et al. (2015) Comparison of photocatalytic and transport properties of TiO2 and ZnO nanostructures for solar-driven water splitting. Phys Chem Chem Phys 17(12):7775–778610.1039/C4CP05857G ↗
66. Goodarzi M, Joukar S, Ghanbari D, Hedayati K (2017) CaFe2O4–ZnO magnetic nanostructures: photo-degradation of toxic azo-dyes under UV irradiation. J Mater Sci: Mater Electron 28(17):12823–12838
67. Wang H, Zhou P, Guo R, Wang Y, Zhan H, Yuan Y (2018) Synthesis of rectorite/Fe3O4/ZnO composites and their application for the removal of methylene blue dye. Catalysts 8(3):10710.3390/catal8030107 ↗
68. Sin JC, Tan SQ, Quek JA, Lam SM, Mohamed AR (2018) Facile fabrication of hierarchical porous ZnO/Fe3O4 composites with enhanced magnetic, photocatalytic and antibacterial properties. Mater Lett 228:207–21110.1016/j.matlet.2018.06.027 ↗
69. Nguyen VC, Nguyen NLG, Pho QH (2015) Preparation of magnetic composite based on zinc oxide nanoparticles and chitosan as a photocatalyst for removal of reactive blue 198. Adv Nat Sci: Nanosci Nanotechnol 6(3):035001
70. El Ghoul J, Kraini M, Lemine OM, El Mir L (2015) Sol–gel synthesis, structural, optical and magnetic properties of Co-doped ZnO nanoparticles. J Mater Sci: Mater Electron 26(4):2614–2621
71. Rahmayeni R, Stiadi Y (2017) Photocatalytic performance of ZnO-ZnFe2O4 magnetic nanocomposites on degradation of congo red dye under solar light irradiation. J Mater Environ Sci 8(5):1634–1643
72. Da Silva RA, Jacinto MJ, Silva VC, Cabana DC (2018) Urea-assisted fabrication of Fe3O4@ZnO@Au composites for the catalytic photodegradation of Rhodamine-B. J Sol–Gel Sci Technol 86:94–10310.1007/s10971-018-4607-0 ↗
73. Jacinto MJ, Vasconcelos LG, Sousa Jr PT, Dall’Oglio EL, Ferreira LF, Silva CF, Oliveira ES (2019) Biosynthesis of Ag nanoparticles and their immobilization on multifunctional ZnO materials—a step closer to environmental feasibility. J Sol–Gel Sci Technol 99:21–3210.1007/s10971-019-05014-2 ↗
74. Nolan NT, Synnott DW, Seery MK, Hinder SJ, Van Wassenhoven A, Pillai SC (2012) Effect of N-doping on the photocatalytic activity of sol–gel TiO2. J Hazard Mater 211:88–9410.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.08.074 ↗
75. Ansari SA, Khan MM, Ansari MO, Cho MH (2016) Nitrogen-doped titanium dioxide (N-doped TiO2) for visible light photocatalysis. New J Chem 40(4):3000–300910.1039/C5NJ03478G ↗
76. Almeida RM, Xu J (2018) Sol‐gel processing of sulfide materials. In: Klein L, Aparicio M, Jitianu A (eds), Handbook of sol-gel science and technology: processing, characterization and applications, p 403–428, Springer, Cham, Switzerland10.1007/978-3-319-32101-1_11 ↗
77. Song J, Wang X, Huang J et al. (2016) High performance of N-doped TiO2-magnetic activated carbon composites under visible light illumination: synthesis and application in three-dimensional photoelectrochemical process. Electrochim Acta 222:1–1110.1016/j.electacta.2016.11.011 ↗
78. Pelaez M, Baruwati B, Varma RS, Luque R, Dionysiou DD (2013) Microcystin-LR removal from aqueous solutions using a magnetically separable N-doped TiO2 nanocomposite under visible light irradiation. Chem Commun 49(86):10118–1012010.1039/c3cc44415e ↗
79. He Z, Hong T, Chen J, Song S (2012) A magnetic TiO2 photocatalyst doped with iodine for organic pollutant degradation. Sep Purif Technol 96:50–5710.1016/j.seppur.2012.05.005 ↗
80. Wang X, Song J, Huang J, Zhang J, Wang X, Ma R, Zhao J (2016) Activated carbon-based magnetic TiO2 photocatalyst codoped with iodine and nitrogen for organic pollution degradation. Appl Surf Sci 390:190–20110.1016/j.apsusc.2016.08.040 ↗
81. Wei F, Liu T, Zhou F, Ran W, Yao Y, Wang H, Wang P (2018) Magnetic recoverable FN Co-doped ZnFe2O4/C/TiO2 nanocomposites with UV-Vis light photocatalytic activity. Environ Eng Sci 35(1):37–4510.1089/ees.2017.0037 ↗
82. Chen H, Jin H, Dong B (2012) Preparation of magnetically supported chromium and sulfur co-doped TiO2 and use for photocatalysis under visible light. Res Chem Intermed 38(9):2335–234210.1007/s11164-012-0549-2 ↗
83. Yan X, Yuan K, Lu N et al. (2017) The interplay of sulfur doping and surface hydroxyl in band gap engineering: mesoporous sulfur-doped TiO2 coupled with magnetite as a recyclable, efficient, visible light active photocatalyst for water purification. Appl Catal B: Environ 218:20–3110.1016/j.apcatb.2017.06.022 ↗
84. Chalasani R, Vasudevan S(2013) Cyclodextrin-functionalized Fe3O4@TiO2: reusable, magnetic nanoparticles for photocatalytic degradation of endocrine-disrupting chemicals in water supplies ACS Nano 7(5):4093–410410.1021/nn400287k ↗
85. Luo W, Hu F, Hu Y et al. (2019) Persulfate enhanced visible light photocatalytic degradation of organic pollutants by construct magnetic hybrid heterostructure. J Alloy Compd 806:1207–121910.1016/j.jallcom.2019.07.329 ↗
86. Kumar S, Kumar B, Baruah A, Shanker V (2013) Synthesis of magnetically separable and recyclable g-C3N4–Fe3O4 hybrid nanocomposites with enhanced photocatalytic performance under visible-light irradiation. J Phys Chem C 117(49):26135–2614310.1021/jp409651g ↗
87. Inbaraj DJ, Chandran B, Mangalaraj C (2019) Synthesis of CoFe2O4 and CoFe2O4/g-C3N4 nanocomposite via honey mediated sol-gel auto combustion method and hydrothermal method with enhanced photocatalytic and efficient Pb+2 adsorption property. Mater Res Express 6(5):05550110.1088/2053-1591/aafd5d ↗
88. Wu Z, Chen X, Liu X, Yang X, Yang Y (2019) A ternary magnetic recyclable ZnO/Fe3O4/gC3N4 composite photocatalyst for efficient photodegradation of monoazo dye. Nanoscale Res Lett 14(1):147
89. Gawande MB, Goswami A, Asefa T et al. (2015) Core–shell nanoparticles: synthesis and applications in catalysis and electrocatalysis. Chem Soc Rev 44(21):7540–759010.1039/C5CS00343A ↗
90. Wu W, He Q, Jiang C (2008) Magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles: synthesis and surface functionalization strategies. Nanoscale Res Lett 3(11):397
91. Jacinto MJ, Wizbiki M, Justino LC, Silva VC (2016) Platinum-supported mesoporous silica of facile recovery as a catalyst for hydrogenation of polyaromatic hydrocarbons under ultra-mild conditions. J Sol–Gel Sci Technol 77(2):298–30510.1007/s10971-015-3854-6 ↗
92. Wang X, He B, Hu Z, Zeng Z, Han S (2014) Current advances in precious metal core–shell catalyst design. Sci Technol Adv Mater 15(4):04350210.1088/1468-6996/15/4/043502 ↗
93. Neris AM, Schreiner WH, Salvador C, Silva UC, Chesman C, Longo E, Santos IMG (2018) Photocatalytic evaluation of the magnetic core@shell system (Co, Mn) Fe2O4@TiO2 obtained by the modified Pechini method. Mater Sci Eng: B 229:218–22610.1016/j.mseb.2017.12.029 ↗
94. Noval VE, Carriazo JG (2019) Fe3O4-TiO2 and Fe3O4-SiO2 Core-shell powders synthesized from industrially processed magnetite (Fe3O4) microparticles. Mater Res 22(3), https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-5373-mr-2018-066010.1590/1980-5373-mr-2018-0660 ↗
95. Tan L, Zhang X, Liu Q et al. (2015) Synthesis of Fe3O4@TiO2 core–shell magnetic composites for highly efficient sorption of uranium (VI). Colloids Surf A: Physicochem Eng Asp 469:279–28610.1016/j.colsurfa.2015.01.040 ↗
96. Salamat S, Younesi H, Bahramifar N (2017) Synthesis of magnetic core–shell Fe3O4@TiO2 nanoparticles from electric arc furnace dust for photocatalytic degradation of steel mill wastewater. RSC Adv 7(31):19391–1940510.1039/C7RA01238A ↗
97. Han C, Jing MX, Shen XQ, Qiao GJ (2017) Fabrication and properties of core–shell structural nano-TiO2@Fe magnetic photocatalyst for removal of phenol waste water. Monatshefte für Chem-Chem Mon 148(7):1165–117010.1007/s00706-016-1821-8 ↗
98. Chang J, Zhang Q, Liu Y, Shi Y, Qin Z (2018) Preparation of Fe3O4/TiO2 magnetic photocatalyst for photocatalytic degradation of phenol. J Mater Sci: Mater Electron 29(10):8258–8266
99. Hong RY, Zhang SZ, Di GQ, Li HZ, Zheng Y, Ding J, Wei DG (2008) Preparation, characterization and application of Fe3O4/ZnO core/shell magnetic nanoparticles. Mater Res Bull 43(8-9):2457–246810.1016/j.materresbull.2007.07.035 ↗
100. Nikazar M, Alizadeh M, Lalavi R, Rostami MH (2014) The optimum conditions for synthesis of Fe3O4/ZnO core/shell magnetic nanoparticles for photodegradation of phenol. J Environ Health Sci Eng 12(1):2110.1186/2052-336X-12-21 ↗