journal article·2016-08

Dissolution kinetics of mesoporous silica nanoparticles in different simulated body fluids

Katharina Braun, Alexander Pochert, Michaela Beck, Richard Fiedler, Jens Gruber, Mika Lindén

Publisher page

Abstract

The application of mesoporous silica nanoparticles as a platform for drug delivery and bioimaging requires a good understanding of the degradability of these particles under physiological conditions. Optimally, the degradability should be studied in vivo using relevant administration routes and dosings, but such studies are complicated and expensive. Thus, the biodegradability is often studied in vitro using simulated body fluids. However, such studies are scarce to date, and the results are partially conflicting. The aims of this study were therefore (a) to determine the influence of the composition of different simulated body fluids on the observed silica dissolution rates and (b) to establish morphological key parameters that determine the dissolution kinetics of silica nanoparticles. As dissolution media, simulated body fluid (SBF), simulated lung fluid (SLF), simulated gastric juice (SGF) and PBS buffer were used, and the silica concentration was kept below the silica saturation limit. Three mesoporous silica particles of different sizes were studied together with one non-porous Stober-type silica particle. The observed silica dissolution rates followed the order SLF > SBF ≈ PBS ≫ SGF. Apart from general pH effects, the presence of organic acids in SLF is suggested to enhance the silica dissolution rate. The specific surface area was identified as the main parameter controlling the rate of dissolution of the different silica particles studied, while particle size influences were minor. The dissolution of mesoporous silicas with different particle sizes has been studied in four different physiological buffers.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mesoporous Materials and Catalysis · Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery · Catalytic Processes in Materials Science

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (27)

Show source-provided references
1. Tang F, Li L, Chen D (2012) Adv Mater 24:1504–153410.1002/adma.201104763 ↗
2. Mamaeva V, Sahlgren C, Lindén M (2013) Adv Drug Deliv Rev 65:689–70210.1016/j.addr.2012.07.018 ↗
3. Baeza A, Colilla M, Vallet-Regí M (2015) Expert Opin Drug Deliv 2:319–33710.1517/17425247.2014.953051 ↗
4. Studer AM, Limbach LK, Van Duc L, Krumeich F, Athanassiou EK, Gerber LC, Moch H, Stark WJ (2010) Toxicol Lett 197:169–17410.1016/j.toxlet.2010.05.012 ↗
5. Oberdörster G (2000) Int Arch Occup Environ Health 73:60–6810.1007/PL00014628 ↗
6. Andersson J, Rosenholm J, Areva S, Lindén M (2004) Chem Mater 16:4160–416710.1021/cm0401490 ↗
7. He Q, Shi J, Zhu M, Chen Y, Chen F (2010) Microporous Mesoporous Mater 131:314–32010.1016/j.micromeso.2010.01.009 ↗
8. Cauda V, Schlossbauer A, Bein T (2010) Microporous Mesoporous Mater 132:60–7110.1016/j.micromeso.2009.11.015 ↗
9. Huang X, Teng X, Chen D, Tang F, He J (2010) Biomaterials 31:438–44810.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.09.060 ↗
10. Rosenholm JM, Meinander A, Peuhu E, Niemi R, Eriksson JE, Sahlgren C, Lindén M (2009) ACS Nano 3:197–20610.1021/nn800781r ↗
11. Grün M, Matsumoto A, Unger KK, Tsutsumi K (1999) Microporous Mesoporous Mater 27:207–21610.1016/S1387-1811(98)00255-8 ↗
12. Sato-Berrú R, Saniger JM, Flores J, Sanchez-Espindola M (2013) J Mater Sci Eng A 3:237–242
13. Marques MRC, Loebenberg R, Almukainzi M (2011) Dissolut Technol 18:15–2810.14227/DT180311P15 ↗
14. Icenhower JP, Dove PM (2000) Geochim Cosmochim Acta 64:4193–420310.1016/S0016-7037(00)00487-7 ↗
15. Xiao Y, Lasaga AC (1994) Geochim Cosmochim Acta 58:5379–540010.1016/0016-7037(94)90237-2 ↗
16. Rosenholm JM, Czuryszkiewicz T, Kleitz F, Rosenholm JB, Lindén M (2007) Langmuir 23:4315–432310.1021/la062450w ↗
17. Vogelsberger W, Löbbus M, Sonnefeld J, Seidel A (1999) Colloids Surf A 159:311–31910.1016/S0927-7757(99)00268-X ↗
18. Majérus O, Gérardin T, Manolescu G, Barboux P, Caurant D (2014) Phys Chem Glasses: Eur J Glass Sci Technol B 55:261–273
19. Bastos IN, Platt GM, Andrade MC, Soares GD (2008) J Mol Liq 139:121–13010.1016/j.molliq.2007.12.003 ↗
20. Tournié A, Majérus O, Lefèvre G, Rager MN, Walmé S, Caurant D, Barboux Ph (2013) J Colloid Interface Sci 400:161–16710.1016/j.jcis.2013.03.009 ↗
21. Demadis KD, Mavredaki E (2005) Environ Chem Lett 3:127–13110.1007/s10311-005-0015-0 ↗
22. McMahon PB, Vroblesky DA, Bradley PM, Chapelle FH, Gullet CD (1995) Ground Water 33:207–21610.1111/j.1745-6584.1995.tb00275.x ↗
23. Dove PM, Han N, De Yoreo JJ (2005) Proc Natl Acad Sci 102:15357–1536210.1073/pnas.0507777102 ↗
24. Kagan M, Lockwood GK, Garofalini SH (2014) Phys Chem Chem Phys 16:9294–930110.1039/C4CP00030G ↗
25. Etienne M, Walcarius A (2003) Talanta 59:1173–118810.1016/S0039-9140(03)00024-9 ↗
26. Cauda V, Argyo C, Bein T (2010) J Mater Chem 20:8693–869910.1039/c0jm01390k ↗
27. Chen K, Zhang J, Gu H (2012) J Mater Chem 22:22005–2201210.1039/c2jm34364a ↗