journal article·2026-07-01

Geometry-consistent strain energy-based modelling, optimization, and dynamic response analysis of structures composed of re-entrant honeycomb cellular solids

Mahesh Kumar, Rajeev Kumar, Vikas Kumar Saxena

Publisher page

Abstract

In the present work, a geometry-consistent decoupled strain energy-based analytical framework is developed to derive closed-form expressions for the effective mechanical properties of re-entrant honeycomb (REH) cellular structures. To facilitate this, an independent deformation behavior of inclined and straight ligaments constituting the complete unit-cell architecture, is evaluated. Unlike conventional homogenized formulations based on uniform ligament behavior, the proposed framework enables member-wise identification of stiffness contribution and load transfer mechanisms governing the effective elastic response of the cellular structure. The decoupled formulation further facilitates selective geometric tailoring of mechanically dominant ligaments, thereby enabling simultaneous enhancement of stiffness, lightweight Ness and load-carrying capability without uniformly increasing ligament thickness throughout the structure. A geometry-consistent multi-objective optimization framework is subsequently developed to maximize stiffness-to-weight efficiency through selective ligament-wise thickness redistribution under density-based constraints. The optimized configurations demonstrate approximately 30% to 60% improvement in relative stiffness while preserving lightweight structural characteristics. Finally, the practical applicability of the optimized REH cellular architecture is investigated through finite element-based dynamic analysis of robotic manipulator links modeled using equivalent homogenized properties. The obtained displacement--time decay and frequency response analyses demonstrate improved vibration attenuation capability, enhanced dynamic stability, and reduced resonance sensitivity of the optimized configurations. Overall, the proposed framework provides a computationally efficient methodology for designing lightweight cellular structures with tunable mechanical properties suitable for advanced robotic and lightweight structural engineering applications.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Cellular and Composite Structures · Topology Optimization in Engineering · Composite Structure Analysis and Optimization

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Indian Institute of Technology Mandi

References (26)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.matdes.2025.11442910.1016/j.matdes.2025.114429 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.finmec.2025.10033510.1016/j.finmec.2025.100335 ↗
3. 10.3390/ma1522802210.3390/ma15228022 ↗
4. 10.1016/S0263-8223(96)00054-210.1016/S0263-8223(96)00054-2 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.mser.2021.10060610.1016/j.mser.2021.100606 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2010.05.00310.1016/j.compstruct.2010.05.003 ↗
7. Ashby MF, Gibson LJ. Cellular solids: structure and properties. Cambridge University Press, 1997, pp. 175–231.
8. 10.1016/j.tws.2020.10661310.1016/j.tws.2020.106613 ↗
9. Gaspar N, Ren X, Smith CW. Analytical and numerical models for the mechanical behavior of cellular materials. Int J Mech Sci 2005; 47(4–5): 775–789.
10. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2013.03.01410.1016/j.compscitech.2013.03.014 ↗
11. Li D, Dong L, Lakes R. Analytical homogenization modeling of auxetic lattice materials. Int J Solid Struct 2017; 112: 184–196.
12. Zou T, Wang P, Fang D. Homogenization approaches for mechanical metamaterials and lattice structures. Mater Des 2020; 192: 108708.
13. Wang Y, Zhang X, Li Q. Multiscale analytical modeling of architected cellular materials. Eng Struct 2021; 242: 112476.
14. Gibson LJ Ashby MF Schajer GS Robertson CI. “The mechanics of two-dimensional cellular materials ”Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A Mathematical and Physical Sciences vol. 382 no. 1782 pp. 25–42 1982.10.1098/rspa.1982.0087 ↗
15. 10.1007/978-3-319-17118-0_710.1007/978-3-319-17118-0_7 ↗
16. Names A. Octagonal hierarchical honeycomb with enhanced crashworthiness: design, optimization, and performance under axial compression. Mater Today Commun 2026; 38: 110830.
17. Names A. Performance study of two-ways gradient octagonal hierarchical honeycomb with excellent energy absorption and crashworthiness properties. J Mater Res Technol 2025; 34: 3705–3725.
18. 10.1016/j.matdes.2026.11559310.1016/j.matdes.2026.115593 ↗
19. Names A. Dynamic instability analysis of sandwich plates with auxetic honeycomb core and three-phase hybrid composite layers stiffened by curved stiffeners using iso-geometric analysis. Eng Struct 2024.
20. 10.1557/mrs2003.7910.1557/mrs2003.79 ↗
21. Srinath LS. Advanced Mechanics of Solids. 3rd ed. New Delhi, India: Tata: McGraw-Hill, 2008.
22. 10.1016/j.euromechsol.2020.10418110.1016/j.euromechsol.2020.104181 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e4198510.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e41985 ↗
24. 10.1007/s10999-024-09732-610.1007/s10999-024-09732-6 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.matdes.2019.10803610.1016/j.matdes.2019.108036 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.tws.2025.11349010.1016/j.tws.2025.113490 ↗