journal article·2026-04-21

Influence of damage (delamination) on modal responses of sandwich composite panel-numerical and experimental analysis

Naveen Kumar Akkasali, Trupti Ranjan Mahapatra, Gaurav Kumar, Usha Rani Sahoo, Ashish Kumar Meher, Subrata Kumar Panda

Publisher page

Abstract

The current research numerically investigates the influence of delamination on the natural frequencies of intact and delaminated glass fiber–reinforced composite (GFRC) sandwich panels. The sandwich structure synthesized via the hand lay-up method consists of two laminated GFRC face sheets bonded to an isotropic cured epoxy core. The results obtained using the present finite element (FE) model implemented in ABAQUS are compared to previous numerical and current experimental findings, demonstrating that the model functions consistently, with major differences of 10.77% and 14.84% found in a few modes. This validated FE model is used to systematically evaluate the influence of boundary conditions, fiber orientation, aspect ratio, core-to-face thickness ratio, and delamination shape on natural frequencies. Results show that fully clamped plates exhibit the highest frequencies, but are also most sensitive to delamination, with reductions approaching 50% in specific modes. Increasing the core-to-face thickness ratio significantly enhances modal performance, yielding up to 29% improvement in higher modes. The unidirectional fiber ([0°/0°] S ) configuration with a core-to-face thickness ratio of 3 offers peak modal performance, with Mode 5 frequencies improving by over 29% and 20%, in intact and delaminated states, respectively. Among all shapes, the rectangular delamination produces the highest natural frequencies, while the square shape results in the lowest overall values. Notably, circular delamination leads to a 16.6% drop in Mode 5, demonstrating strong higher-mode sensitivity to delamination geometry. The findings provide design guidelines for optimizing stiffness and vibration resilience in GFRC sandwich structures.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Composite Structure Analysis and Optimization · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Aeroelasticity and Vibration Control

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Mechanical Engineering, SASTRA Deemed University, Thanjavur, India

Veer Surendra Sai University of Technology

National Institute of Technology Rourkela

References (32)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/pc.2698910.1002/pc.26989 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.04.00710.1016/j.compstruct.2015.04.007 ↗
3. 10.1177/0967391121105767910.1177/09673911211057679 ↗
4. 10.1155/2018/571586310.1155/2018/5715863 ↗
5. 10.1142/S021945542350120110.1142/S0219455423501201 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.tws.2019.10642510.1016/j.tws.2019.106425 ↗
7. Safaei B, Chukwueloka Onyibo E, Goren M, et al. Free vibration investigation on RVE of proposed honeycomb sandwich beam and material selection optimization. Facta Univ – Ser Mech Eng 2023; 21: 031–050. https://doi.org/10.22190/fume220806042s
8. 10.1016/j.istruc.2020.09.01010.1016/j.istruc.2020.09.010 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.euromechsol.2025.10570010.1016/j.euromechsol.2025.105700 ↗
10. 10.1177/1099636221102042610.1177/10996362211020426 ↗
11. 10.1155/2016/328764510.1155/2016/3287645 ↗
12. 10.1177/109963621772800910.1177/1099636217728009 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.acme.2017.01.00110.1016/j.acme.2017.01.001 ↗
14. 10.1088/1757-899X/798/1/01203610.1088/1757-899X/798/1/012036 ↗
15. 10.1140/epjp/s13360-021-01632-410.1140/epjp/s13360-021-01632-4 ↗
16. 10.1007/s00419-022-02359-z10.1007/s00419-022-02359-z ↗
17. 10.1177/1099636221104954010.1177/10996362211049540 ↗
18. Baba BO, Gibson RF. The vibration response of composite sandwich beam with delamination. Adv Compos Lett; 16. https://doi.org/10.1177/096369350701600204, Epub ahead of print 1 March 2007.
19. 10.1177/0309324724123135910.1177/03093247241231359 ↗
20. 10.12989/aas.2016.3.1.01510.12989/aas.2016.3.1.015 ↗
21. 10.1016/0263-8223(93)90226-G10.1016/0263-8223(93)90226-G ↗
22. 10.1016/j.euromechsol.2023.10506810.1016/j.euromechsol.2023.105068 ↗
23. 10.1177/109963620707648410.1177/1099636207076484 ↗
24. 10.1007/s00707-022-03176-910.1007/s00707-022-03176-9 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2025.11947310.1016/j.compstruct.2025.119473 ↗
26. 10.1177/0967391121100339910.1177/09673911211003399 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.coco.2025.10241210.1016/j.coco.2025.102412 ↗
28. 10.1080/17455030.2022.209118110.1080/17455030.2022.2091181 ↗
29. 10.1177/002199832096707310.1177/0021998320967073 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.euromechsol.2020.10400310.1016/j.euromechsol.2020.104003 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2024.11837510.1016/j.compstruct.2024.118375 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.11.07110.1016/j.compstruct.2018.11.071 ↗