Interstitial loop strengthening upon deformation in aluminum via molecular dynamics simulations
Source abstract
Abstract
The formation of prismatic interstitial loops during plastic deformation, as well as their interaction with dislocations, is systematically investigated in aluminum, using molecular dynamics simulations. First, direct dislocation interaction is responsible for producing various types of defects, typically vacancies and their clusters and interstitial loops. Secondly, small interstitial loops act as obstacles to dislocation gliding. When close to each other, a loop either decorates a dislocation with jogs or drags it elastically. The mobility of a dislocation decorated by a loop is significantly reduced. Depending on the relative position of the dislocation and the loop, the Peierls stress can increase several hundred times. The present work shows a complete picture of dislocation–loop interaction with atomic-scale details, which provides reliable information for parameterizing dislocation–debris interactions in constitutive models.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and mechanical properties · Fusion materials and technologies · Ion-surface interactions and analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (56)
Show source-provided references
1. Singh · 2001
2. Wirth · J Nucl Mater · 2000 · 276 · 3310.1016/S0022-3115(99)00166-X ↗
3. Yao · J Nucl Mater · 2004 · 329–33 · 112710.1016/j.jnucmat.2004.04.036 ↗
4. Yao · Philos Mag · 2005 · 85 · 74510.1080/14786430412331319947 ↗
5. Arakawa · Phys Rev Lett · 2006 · 96 · 12550610.1103/PhysRevLett.96.125506 ↗
6. Bacon · J Metal · 2007 · 59 · 40
7. Schäublin · Mater Sci Eng A · 2005 · 400–401 · 25110.1016/j.msea.2005.03.093 ↗
8. Arakawa · Science · 2007 · 318 · 95610.1126/science.1145386 ↗
9. Matsukawa · Science · 2007 · 318 · 95910.1126/science.1148336 ↗
10. Rodney · Acta Mater · 2004 · 52 · 60710.1016/j.actamat.2003.09.044 ↗
11. Rodney · Nucl Instrum Meth B · 2005 · 228 · 10010.1016/j.nimb.2004.10.029 ↗
12. Osetsky · Philos Mag Lett · 2006 · 86 · 51110.1080/09500830600908988 ↗
13. Saintoyant · J Nucl Mater · 2007 · 361 · 20610.1016/j.jnucmat.2006.12.023 ↗
14. Uberuaga · Phys Rev Lett · 2007 · 99 · 13550110.1103/PhysRevLett.99.135501 ↗
15. Martinez · J Mech Phys Solids · 2008 · 56 · 86910.1016/j.jmps.2007.06.014 ↗
16. Martinez · Philos Mag · 2008 · 88 · 80910.1080/14786430801986662 ↗
17. Martinez · Philos Mag · 2008 · 88 · 84110.1080/14786430801986654 ↗
18. Matsukawa · Philos Mag · 2008 · 88 · 58110.1080/14786430801898644 ↗
19. Lee · Philos Mag · 2009 · 89 · 82110.1080/14786430902776954 ↗
20. Niewczas · Philos Mag · 2009 · 89 · 72710.1080/14786430902740703 ↗
21. Niewczas · Philos Mag · 2009 · 89 · 62310.1080/14786430902740737 ↗
22. Bacon · 2009
23. Rodney · Phys Rev Lett · 1999 · 82 · 327210.1103/PhysRevLett.82.3272 ↗
24. Osetsky · Philos Mag Lett · 2004 · 84 · 74510.1080/09500830500061607 ↗
25. Bacon · Philos Mag · 2006 · 86 · 392110.1080/14786430600570527 ↗
26. Li · Model Simul Mater Sci Eng · 2003 · 11 · 17310.1088/0965-0393/11/2/305 ↗
27. Soneda · Philos Mag A · 2001 · 81 · 33110.1080/01418610108214307 ↗
28. Marian · Phys Rev B · 2002 · 65 · 14410210.1103/PhysRevB.65.144102 ↗
29. Osetsky · Philos Mag · 2003 · 83 · 6110.1080/0141861021000016793 ↗
30. Terentyev · Phys Rev B · 2007 · 7510.1103/PhysRevB.75.104108 ↗
31. Xu · IOP Conf Ser: Mater Sci Eng · 2009 · 3 · 01202410.1088/1757-899X/3/1/012024 ↗
32. Wang · Acta Mater · 2008 · 56 · 460810.1016/j.actamat.2008.05.019 ↗
33. Wang · Acta Mater · 2009 · 57 · 372510.1016/j.actamat.2009.04.019 ↗
34. Seeger · Philos Mag · 1955 · 46 · 119410.1080/14786441108520632 ↗
35. Saada · Acta Metall · 1961 · 9 · 16610.1016/0001-6160(61)90064-5 ↗
36. Silcox · Philos Mag · 1959 · 4 · 7210.1080/14786435908238228 ↗
37. Kimura · Appl Phys Lett · 1963 · 3 · 410.1063/1.1723560 ↗
38. Kiritani · Philos Mag Lett · 1999 · 79 · 79710.1080/095008399176616 ↗
39. Kiritani · Radiat Eff Defects Solids · 2002 · 157 · 5310.1080/10420150211397 ↗
40. Essmann · Philos Mag A · 1979 · 40 · 73110.1080/01418617908234871 ↗
41. Wang · Model Simul Mater Sci Eng · 2013 · 21 · 02500210.1088/0965-0393/21/2/025002 ↗
42. Wang · Acta Mater · 2011 · 59 · 110.1016/j.actamat.2010.07.046 ↗
43. Wang · Acta Mater · 2011 · 59 · 1010.1016/j.actamat.2010.07.044 ↗
44. Wang · Acta Mater · 2011 · 59 · 1910.1016/j.actamat.2010.07.045 ↗
45. Wang · Phys Rev B · 2011 · 84 · 22010310.1103/PhysRevB.84.220103 ↗
46. Wang · Philos Mag · 2013 · 93 · 18610.1080/14786435.2012.674224 ↗
47. Wirth · J Eng Mater Technol · 2002 · 124 · 32910.1115/1.1479692 ↗
48. Osetsky · Philos Mag · 2006 · 86 · 229510.1080/14786430500513783 ↗
49. Rong · Mater Sci Eng A · 2005 · 400–401 · 37810.1016/j.msea.2005.03.066 ↗
50. Rong · Philos Mag · 2005 · 85 · 147310.1080/14786430500036371 ↗
51. Veyssière · Philos Mag A · 2002 · 82 · 56710.1080/01418610208239617 ↗
52. Veyssière · IOP Conf Ser: Mater Sci Eng · 2009 · 3 · 01201810.1088/1757-899X/3/1/012018 ↗
53. Rong · Philos Mag · 2005 · 85 · 17110.1080/14786430412331315644 ↗
54. Fu · Nat Mater · 2005 · 4 · 6810.1038/nmat1286 ↗
55. Fan · Phys Rev B · 2010 · 81 · 10410210.1103/PhysRevB.81.104102 ↗
56. Marinica · Phys Rev B · 2011 · 83 · 09411910.1103/PhysRevB.83.094119 ↗