journal article·2024-10Open access

Test methods for determination of shear properties of sandwich panels

Shekhar Silwal, Kristo Mela, Zhongcheng Ma

Abstract

This paper presents analysis and comparison of test methods for determining transverse shear strength and shear modulus of steel-faced sandwich panels commonly used in construction. The test methods are taken from the governing European standard EN 14509:2013. Two-point loading and four-point loading test methods as well as a full-scale test method are examined. Based on extensive experimental work on sandwich panels with varying core thickness, comprising mineral wool (MW) and polyisocyanurate (PIR) and encompassing both roof and wall panels, this study provides details of the test setup for the four-point loading and vacuum box methods with which a pure shear failure is obtained. Such details are missing from EN 14509. This paper highlights that the two-point loading method fails to consistently produce shear failure, especially in thicker panels, indicating it does not accurately measure transverse shear strength. The results of the experiments conducted in this study indicate that the four-point loading and full-scale test methods provide consistent shear failure for thicker panels while yielding greater transverse shear strength than the two-point loading test in general.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Structural Load-Bearing Analysis · Structural Analysis of Composite Materials · Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Tampere University

Häme University of Applied Sciences

Funding

Doctoral School of Industry Innovations at Tampere University · Ruukki Construction

References (18)

Show source-provided references
1. Davies JM. Lightweight sandwich construction. Oxford: Blackwell Sciences, 2008.
2. Blagojevic B, Širok B, Štremfelj B. Simulation of the effect of melt composition on mineral wool fibre thickness. Ceramics 2004; 48: 128–134.
3. 10.5755/j01.ms.18.2.192610.5755/j01.ms.18.2.1926 ↗
4. Buska A. The influence of macrostructure and other physical characteristics on compressive parameters of mineral wool products. Lithuania: Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, 2010.
5. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.10.04510.1016/j.compositesb.2014.10.045 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.istruc.2023.10581510.1016/j.istruc.2023.105815 ↗
7. 10.1106/10567890202724710.1106/105678902027247 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.12.01010.1016/j.compstruct.2012.12.010 ↗
9. 10.1106/10996360302602010.1106/109963603026020 ↗
10. EN 14509: 2013. Self-supporting double skin metal faced insulating panels. Factory made products. Specifications 2013.
11. EN 1993-1-3. Eurocode 3 - design of steel structures - Part 1-3: general rules - Supplementary rules for cold-formed members and sheeting 2005.
12. ASTM C393M/C393M -20. Standard test method for core shear properties of sandwich constructions by beam flexure.
13. ASTM D7250/D7250M − 20. Standard practice for determining sandwich beam flexural and shear stiffness.
14. EN 1602. Thermal insulating products for building applications. Determination of the apparent density 2013.
15. SFS-EN ISO 6892-1. Metallic materials. Tensile testing. Part 1: method of test at room temperature 2019.
16. EN 12085. Thermal insulating products for building applications. Determination of linear dimensions of test specimens 2013.
17. 10.1007/978-3-7091-8334-210.1007/978-3-7091-8334-2 ↗
18. Davies JM. The analysis of sandwich panels with profiled faces. International Specialty Conference on Cold-Formed Steel Structures. 1986; 1: 351–369.