Sandwich shield subjected to bird impact: Use of surrogate models for influencing parameter analysis and shield behaviour understanding
Source abstract
Abstract
In this work, the behaviour of a sandwich shield subjected to a 1.82 kg bird impact at 175 m/s is studied using a finite element model. The 6 most influential design parameters are varied and their effects on the shield behaviour and on the target protection are assessed. First, we try to establish an engineer's visualization by varying parameters 2 × 2 using three 5-levels full-factorial design of experiments. These three 2D design of experiments enable us to visualize precisely the different effects of each parameter. Then a full sensitivity analysis (6D) is performed using a Latin Hypercube sampling to assess the possible interactions between parameters. Surrogate models are constructed using the Gaussian Process framework to follow the variation of the outputs in the 6D design space. These surrogate models are finally studied using two statistical methods: the Sobol′ method and the Morris method. The methodology developed in this study enables to improve the understanding of the behaviour of a shield under a soft body impact, as a first step towards a shield design tool.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design · High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior · Structural Response to Dynamic Loads
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
CNRS, ISAE-SUPAERO, Institut Clément Ader (ICA), Université de Toulouse, Toulouse, France
CNRS, UPS, Institut Clément Ader (ICA), Université de Toulouse, Toulouse, France
Funding
Région Occitanie · BPI France
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. Dennis N · 2008
2. CS-25 – Certification specifications and acceptable means of compliance for large aeroplanes, Section CS-25.631 – Bird strike damage. European Aviation Safety Agency, 2003.
3. 14 CFR Part 25 - Airworthiness standards: Transport category airplanes, Section 25.631 - Bird strike damage. Federal Aviation Administration, Dept. of transportation, 2003.
4. Gibson LJ · 1999
5. Barber JP, Taylor HR, Wilbeck JS. Characterization of bird impacts on a rigid plate: part 1. Air Force Flight Dynamics Laboratory, Technical Report AFFDL-TR-75-5, Dayton, US, January 1975.10.21236/ADA021142 ↗
6. Barber JP, Taylor HR, Wilbeck JS. Bird impact forces and pressures on rigid and compliant targets. Air Force Flight Dynamics Laboratory, Technical Report AFFDL-TR-77-60, Dayton, US, May 1978.
7. Wilbeck JS. Impact behavior of low strength projectiles. Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Technical Report AFML-TR-77-134, October 1978.
8. 10.1016/j.compstruc.2011.08.00710.1016/j.compstruc.2011.08.007 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2005.04.01110.1016/j.ijimpeng.2005.04.011 ↗
10. Hedayati R · Sci Technol · 2013 · 28 · 9
11. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2004.09.00410.1016/j.ijimpeng.2004.09.004 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.matdes.2012.01.04310.1016/j.matdes.2012.01.043 ↗
13. 10.1061/(ASCE)AS.1943-5525.000028010.1061/(ASCE)AS.1943-5525.0000280 ↗
14. 10.1061/(ASCE)AS.1943-5525.000050510.1061/(ASCE)AS.1943-5525.0000505 ↗
15. 10.1080/13588265.2014.100222810.1080/13588265.2014.1002228 ↗
16. 10.1177/109963621769749910.1177/1099636217697499 ↗
17. Johnson GR, Cook WH. A constitutive model and data for metals subjected to large strains, high strain rates and high temperatures. In: Proceedings of the 7th international symposium on ballistics. The Netherlands, 19–21 April 1983, pp.541–547.
18. 10.1177/109963621350110210.1177/1099636213501102 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.paerosci.2005.02.00110.1016/j.paerosci.2005.02.001 ↗
20. Forrester A, Sobester A, Keane A. Engineering design via surrogate modelling: a practical guide. John Wiley & Sons, 2008.10.1002/9780470770801 ↗
21. Goupy J, Creighton L. Introduction aux plans d’expériences . 3ème éd. Paris: Dunod, 2006.
22. Simpson TW · Int J Reliab Appl · 2001 · 2 · 209
23. 10.1016/0378-3758(90)90122-B10.1016/0378-3758(90)90122-B ↗
24. Rasmussen CE · 2006
25. 10.1080/00401706.1991.1048480410.1080/00401706.1991.10484804 ↗
26. 10.1016/S0378-4754(00)00270-610.1016/S0378-4754(00)00270-6 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.cageo.2012.03.00810.1016/j.cageo.2012.03.008 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2013.05.00710.1016/j.ijimpeng.2013.05.007 ↗