Observation of changing crystal orientations during grain coarsening
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Understanding the underlying mechanisms of grain coarsening is important in controlling the properties of metals, which strongly depend on the microstructure that forms during the production process or during use at high temperature. Grain coarsening of austenite at 1273 K in a binary Fe–2 wt.% Mn alloy was studied using synchrotron radiation. Evolution of the volume, average crystallographic orientation and mosaicity of more than 2000 individual austenite grains was tracked during annealing. It was found that an approximately linear relationship exists between grain size and mosaicity, which means that orientation gradients are present in the grains. The orientation gradients remain constant during coarsening and consequently the character of grain boundaries changes during coarsening, affecting the coarsening rate. Furthermore, changes in the average orientation of grains during coarsening were observed. The changes could be understood by taking the observed orientation gradients and anisotropic movement of grain boundaries into account. Five basic modes of grain coarsening were deduced from the measurements, which include: anisotropic (I) and isotropic (II) growth (or shrinkage); movement of grain boundaries resulting in no change in volume but a change in shape (III); movement of grain boundaries resulting in no change in volume and mosaicity, but a change in crystallographic orientation (IV); no movement of grain boundaries (V).
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels · Microstructure and mechanical properties · Metallurgy and Material Forming
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. Humphreys · 2004
2. Gottstein · 1999
3. Holm · Science · 2010 · 328 · 113810.1126/science.1187833 ↗
4. von Neumann · 1952 · 108
5. Hillert · Acta Metall · 1965 · 13 · 22710.1016/0001-6160(65)90200-2 ↗
6. Mullins · Acta Metall · 1989 · 37 · 297910.1016/0001-6160(89)90333-7 ↗
7. Glazier · Phys Rev Lett · 1993 · 70 · 217010.1103/PhysRevLett.70.2170 ↗
8. MacPherson · Nature · 2007 · 446 · 105310.1038/nature05745 ↗
9. Rohrer · Annu Rev Mater Res · 2005 · 35 · 9910.1146/annurev.matsci.33.041002.094657 ↗
10. Militzer · Metall Mater Trans A Phys Metall Mater Sci · 1996 · 27 · 339910.1007/BF02595433 ↗
11. Zhou · Metall Mater Trans A Phys Metall Mater Sci · 2010 · 41A · 211210.1007/s11661-010-0246-y ↗
12. Mullins · Acta Metall · 1958 · 6 · 41410.1016/0001-6160(58)90020-8 ↗
13. Krill · Phys Rev Lett · 2001 · 86 · 84210.1103/PhysRevLett.86.842 ↗
14. Margulies · Science · 2001 · 291 · 239210.1126/science.1057956 ↗
15. Poulsen · J Appl Crystallogr · 2001 · 34 · 75110.1107/S0021889801014273 ↗
16. Offerman · Science · 2002 · 298 · 100310.1126/science.1076681 ↗
17. Larson · Nature · 2002 · 415 · 88710.1038/415887a ↗
18. Schmidt · Science · 2004 · 305 · 22910.1126/science.1098627 ↗
19. Schmidt · Scripta Mater · 2008 · 59 · 49110.1016/j.scriptamat.2008.04.049 ↗
20. Poulsen · 2004
21. Sharma · Rev Sci Instrum · 2009 · 80 · 710.1063/1.3262501 ↗
22. Warren · 1990
23. Landheer H. PhD thesis, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft; 2010.
24. Haslam · Mater Sci Eng A Struct Mater Prop Microstruct Process · 2001 · 318 · 29310.1016/S0921-5093(01)01266-7 ↗
25. Farkas · Phys Rev Lett · 2007 · 98 · 16550210.1103/PhysRevLett.98.165502 ↗
26. Upmanyu · Acta Mater · 2006 · 54 · 170710.1016/j.actamat.2005.11.036 ↗
27. Watanabe · Acta Metall · 1989 · 37 · 94110.1016/0001-6160(89)90021-7 ↗
28. Holm · Acta Mater · 2001 · 49 · 298110.1016/S1359-6454(01)00207-5 ↗