A comparison of three population-based optimization techniques for the design of composite sandwich materials
Source abstract
Abstract
Three population-based optimization techniques — particle swarm optimization, ant colony optimization, and simulated annealing — are applied to the multi-objective design of sandwich materials. The formulation of the algorithms is described, along with metrics for quantifying their performance. For the case study considered of a sandwich beam in bending, it is shown that the ant colony technique out-performs the other two algorithms with respect to identifying optimal geometries, materials, and lay-ups for a stiff sandwich in which low mass and low cost are the design objectives. The particle swarm and simulated annealing algorithms were found to have particular difficulties in handling the optimization of multi-ply oriented fiber-reinforced polymer facing laminates.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Composite Structure Analysis and Optimization · Topology Optimization in Engineering · Advanced Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
New Rail, School of Mechanical & Systems Engineering, Newcastle University, UK
New Rail, School of Mechanical & Systems Engineering, Newcastle University, UK,
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1179/174328909X38782910.1179/174328909X387829 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2009.10.01810.1016/j.compstruct.2009.10.018 ↗
3. Deb K. · 2001
4. 10.1109/4235.99601710.1109/4235.996017 ↗
5. 10.1080/0305215010894092610.1080/03052150108940926 ↗
6. Kennedy J.
7. 10.1109/3477.48443610.1109/3477.484436 ↗
8. 10.1007/s00158-008-0235-610.1007/s00158-008-0235-6 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2007.10.01110.1016/j.compositesa.2007.10.011 ↗
10. 10.1126/science.220.4598.67110.1126/science.220.4598.671 ↗
11. 10.1007/BF0094081210.1007/BF00940812 ↗
12. 10.1016/S0305-0548(01)00109-510.1016/S0305-0548(01)00109-5 ↗
13. 10.1080/0305215000894091110.1080/03052150008940911 ↗
14. 10.1057/palgrave.jors.260206810.1057/palgrave.jors.2602068 ↗
15. 10.1007/s10898-006-9120-210.1007/s10898-006-9120-2 ↗
16. 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1360(199907)8:4<221::AID-MCDA247>3.0.CO;2-O10.1002/(SICI)1099-1360(199907)8:4<221::AID-MCDA247>3.0.CO;2-O ↗
17. Allen HG · 1969
18. Gibson RF · 1994
19. Matthews FL · 1994
20. Zenkert D. · 1995
21. Ashby MF · 2005
22. Van Veldhuizen DA
23. Baran B.
24. 10.1109/TEVC.2004.82606710.1109/TEVC.2004.826067 ↗
25. 10.1080/0305215060093049310.1080/03052150600930493 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.ejor.2006.03.04110.1016/j.ejor.2006.03.041 ↗
27. 10.1162/10636560056820210.1162/106365600568202 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.eswa.2008.01.08810.1016/j.eswa.2008.01.088 ↗