journal article·2026-05Open access

One-shot manufacturing of foam core sandwich composite without adhesive and its acousto-ultrasonic non-destructive evaluation

Woo Cheol Jang, Won Jong Jeong, Hyung Doh Roh

Abstract

This study investigates the interfacial bonding reliability of CFRP/PVC foam core sandwich composites fabricated via a one-shot co-curing process without adhesive film, aiming to overcome the limitations of conventional multi-step bonding methods. Various types of carbon fiber prepregs were co-cured with a PVC foam core in a single-step process using either an oven or a hot press. To assess the bonding strength, mechanical testing, optical microscopy, and ultrasonic testing were conducted, focusing on the resin impregnation into the core. The results showed that the 3K and 12K configurations achieved sufficient bonding strength even without adhesive film, with failures mainly occurring within the foam core. The strengths of the adhesive-less composite was as acceptable as only 0–3.63% difference in average was observed with 5.75–9.34% weight reduction and 19.22–29.74% cost saving in compared to the conventional composite. In contrast, the UD and 6K configurations exhibited interfacial debonding because of insufficient resin impregnation to the foam core. Ultrasonic non-destructive evaluation analyzed the interfacial bonding at the interface. This study revealed the structural feasibility of adhesive-free one-shot co-curing. The proposed method enables reliable sandwich composite manufacturing without adhesive film, enhancing the lightweight and cost.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Epoxy Resin Curing Processes · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Cellular and Composite Structures

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Hanyang University ERICA

Funding

Korea Institute of Material Science

References (37)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.dt.2023.02.02510.1016/j.dt.2023.02.025 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.jer.2024.02.01710.1016/j.jer.2024.02.017 ↗
3. 10.1007/978-981-97-6968-1_310.1007/978-981-97-6968-1_3 ↗
4. Abdalslam S. Impact damage analysis of balsa wood sandwich composite materials 2013.
5. 10.1007/s12541-025-01285-810.1007/s12541-025-01285-8 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2020.10622410.1016/j.compositesa.2020.106224 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.04.05510.1016/j.compositesb.2015.04.055 ↗
8. 10.3390/jcs801002310.3390/jcs8010023 ↗
9. 10.1007/s12221-021-0792-510.1007/s12221-021-0792-5 ↗
10. 10.1007/s42114-019-00096-610.1007/s42114-019-00096-6 ↗
11. 10.1002/adv.2018610.1002/adv.20186 ↗
12. 10.1007/s40430-019-1646-610.1007/s40430-019-1646-6 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.01.01510.1016/j.compositesb.2018.01.015 ↗
14. Zenkert D, Allen HG. An introduction to sandwich construction. Engineering Materials Advisory Services. 1995. https://books.google.co.kr/books/about/An_Introduction_to_Sandwich_Construction.html?id=zc-GQgAACAAJ&redir_esc=y.
15. 10.1177/109963621561714910.1177/1099636215617149 ↗
16. 10.1002/ep.1395610.1002/ep.13956 ↗
17. Hoo FMS, Vedire AR, Pakala AK. Effect of temperature on the mechanical behavior of pvc foams. J Cell Plast 2024; 60(5-6): 261–281.
18. 10.1016/B978-0-12-819482-9.00011-310.1016/B978-0-12-819482-9.00011-3 ↗
19. 10.3390/jcs606017210.3390/jcs6060172 ↗
20. CMH-17: Wichita State. Composite materials handbook. Vol. 6. Structural sandwich composites. SAE International, 2013.
21. 10.1016/j.matdes.2022.11101310.1016/j.matdes.2022.111013 ↗
22. 10.3390/polym1615221610.3390/polym16152216 ↗
23. 10.1201/978142000598110.1201/9781420005981 ↗
24. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.465-466.10110.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.465-466.101 ↗
25. 10.1007/s00170-021-07505-510.1007/s00170-021-07505-5 ↗
26. Zhao CH, Zhang GC. Effect of gravity on resin flow behavior by VARI process. Adv Mat Res 2012; 557–559: 1471–1474.
27. 10.3390/ma1515527910.3390/ma15155279 ↗
28. ASTM International. ASTM C297/C297M: standard test method for flatwise tensile strength of sandwich constructions. ASTM International, 2016.
29. ASTM International. ASTM E2580-17: standard practice for ultrasonic testing of flat panel composites and sandwich core materials. ASTM International, 2017.
30. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2013.05.01310.1016/j.compositesa.2013.05.013 ↗
31. Arafath A Fernlund G and Poursartip A. Gas transport in prepregs: model and permeability experiments. In: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Composite Materials (ICCM-17) Edinburgh UK. 2009. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/268290326_Gas_transport_in_prepregs_Model_and_permeability_experiments
32. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.08.04010.1016/j.compositesb.2013.08.040 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.jsamd.2024.10079310.1016/j.jsamd.2024.100793 ↗
34. 10.3390/app1019675710.3390/app10196757 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.ultras.2013.01.01410.1016/j.ultras.2013.01.014 ↗
36. Rokhlin SI Lavrentyev AI Li B. Research: ultrasonic evaluation of environmental durability of adhesive joints.
37. Dequine DL, Rush C. Continuous fiber composite part cost vs production volume by manufacturing process and material. Lockheed Martin, 2014, p. 23.