Flexure-after-impact behaviors of green composite sandwich beams with natural fiber facesheets and balsa cores
Source abstract
Abstract
Composite sandwich structures composed of artificial materials are widely used. However, manufacturing artificial materials requires extensive energy and significantly impact our environment. Therefore, there is a growing focus on manufacturing composites using natural materials. This study used flax fabric, cotton fabric, glass fiber fabric, and polylactic acid (PLA) to fabricate the facesheets of sandwich beams, with balsa panels used as the cores. Tensile, flexure, tensile-after-impact (TAI), and flexure-after-impact (FAI) tests were conducted on the constituent materials and the sandwich beams. As expected, glass fiber reinforced PLA (GFRP) exhibited the highest tensile, flexural, and TAI properties compared to flax fiber reinforced PLA (FFRP) and cotton fiber reinforced PLA (CoFRP) and contributed to the highest FAI strengths in the sandwich beams using GFRP facesheets. It was also observed that a stiffer facesheet resulted in more core crushing in its sandwich beams when subjected to FAI tests, while a weaker facesheet led to more debonding in its sandwich beams. Since sustainable natural materials have been attracting research interest and are used in various areas, this work contributes to using natural composite materials and sustainable development.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Cellular and Composite Structures · Mechanical Behavior of Composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical and Electro-Mechanical Engineering, National Sun Yat-sen University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
Funding
National Science and Technology Council of Taiwan
References (42)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1017/978113905058610.1017/9781139050586 ↗
2. 10.1201/b1962610.1201/b19626 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.tws.2013.05.00610.1016/j.tws.2013.05.006 ↗
4. 10.1177/109963620935984510.1177/1099636209359845 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2010.05.00310.1016/j.compstruct.2010.05.003 ↗
6. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000085610.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000856 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.istruc.2023.10581510.1016/j.istruc.2023.105815 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2004.02.01510.1016/j.scriptamat.2004.02.015 ↗
9. Mudassir S · Int J Mater Sci · 2016 · 11 · 47
10. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2022.10855410.1016/j.engfracmech.2022.108554 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.measurement.2022.11105710.1016/j.measurement.2022.111057 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.10534010.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105340 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.06.02310.1016/j.jclepro.2014.06.023 ↗
14. 10.1177/002199831347632510.1177/0021998313476325 ↗
15. Jacob A. Building confidence in recycled carbon fiber. https://www.compositesworld.com/articles/building-confidence-in-recycled-carbon-fiber (2019, accessed 17 February 2022).
16. Gen 2 carbon, https://www.gen2carbon.com/ (2021, accessed 28 February 2022).
17. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.04.03910.1016/j.compositesb.2012.04.039 ↗
18. 10.14416/j.asep.2020.06.00110.14416/j.asep.2020.06.001 ↗
19. 10.4236/jmmce.2015.3504410.4236/jmmce.2015.35044 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.06.01410.1016/j.jmrt.2021.06.014 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2003.09.01610.1016/j.compositesa.2003.09.016 ↗
22. Brink Rpe M · 2003
23. 10.3139/9783446442504.02110.3139/9783446442504.021 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2011.01.01010.1016/j.compositesb.2011.01.010 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.11375010.1016/j.compstruct.2021.113750 ↗
26. 10.22159/ajpcr.2020.v13i7.3775610.22159/ajpcr.2020.v13i7.37756 ↗
27. Auras RA · 2011
28. 10.1039/978184973345810.1039/9781849733458 ↗
29. 10.3390/polym1411219410.3390/polym14112194 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.12748310.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127483 ↗
31. 10.1016/S0266-3538(03)00103-910.1016/S0266-3538(03)00103-9 ↗
32. 10.1177/0967391121102515910.1177/09673911211025159 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2013.08.03710.1016/j.compscitech.2013.08.037 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.matpr.2021.07.23210.1016/j.matpr.2021.07.232 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.matpr.2022.06.55910.1016/j.matpr.2022.06.559 ↗
36. Swartz. Ochroma pyramidale. https://web.archive.org/web/20101122130918l (2010, accessed 28 October 2023).
37. 10.1016/j.mechmat.2015.01.01410.1016/j.mechmat.2015.01.014 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.matdes.2022.11101310.1016/j.matdes.2022.111013 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.03.04810.1016/j.matdes.2016.03.048 ↗
40. 10.1177/109963621875716410.1177/1099636218757164 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.11504610.1016/j.compstruct.2021.115046 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2015.01.01310.1016/j.compscitech.2015.01.013 ↗