Performance of squat 3D sandwich walls with longitudinal reinforcement and boundary elements under lateral cyclic loading
Source abstract
Abstract
Three-dimensional (3D) sandwich precast concrete walls are often used in building construction due to their superior performance, thermal efficiency, and speed of fabrication. When applied to low-rise buildings, this technology facilitates a cellular structure composed of squat sandwich walls sustaining gravity loads and performing as shear wall against lateral loads. Not much research information is available on squat 3D sandwich walls under in-plane lateral loading. This paper discusses experimental investigations on eight squat 3D sandwich walls were tested, in which four were without and four with boundary elements. In each group of four walls, two were provided with only weld mesh as reinforcement and remaining two were provided with additional longitudinal reinforcement. The shear span-to-width ratio of walls was 1.0 or 0.87 subjected to lateral quasi-static reversed loading cycles, while the vertical load was kept constant. The dimensions of unstiffened 3D sandwich walls are 1250 mm × 1250 mm, whereas the dimensions of the stiffened 3D sandwich walls are 1125 mm × 1250 mm (size of stiffening element: 370 mm × 1250 mm). The behavior of squat 3D sandwich walls has been investigated in terms of load–displacement response, crack pattern, mode of failure, ductility, stiffness degradation, and energy dissipation. Also, the present study attempts to validate the current design practices, both in Europe (Euro code 8) and in the United States (ACI 318) in relation with the experimental results. Also, other available design equations established for reinforced concrete walls to verify the applicability of these empirical formulae for sandwich walls have been examined. From the test results on 3D sandwich walls, it has been observed that the addition of longitudinal reinforcement and the boundary elements exhibited strong coupling action of shear due to the squat nature of the walls. The 3D sandwich walls with additional longitudinal reinforcement showed significant strength and stiffness.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Masonry and Concrete Structural Analysis · Structural Engineering and Vibration Analysis · Microbial Applications in Construction Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Structural Engineering Division, Civil Engineering Department, Indian Institute of Technology, Chennai, India
References (27)
Show source-provided references
1. Salmon DC · ACI J · 1997 · 94 · 354
2. Salonikios TN · ACI Struct J · 1999 · 96 · 649
3. 10.1193/1.149035310.1193/1.1490353 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.12.02710.1016/j.engstruct.2011.12.027 ↗
5. Abdul HNH · Int J Emerg Technol Adv Eng · 2013 · 3 · 1
6. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.03.04610.1016/j.engstruct.2013.03.046 ↗
7. Fatima AIR · World Appl Sci J · 2015 · 33 · 1718
8. Paulay T and Priestley MJN. Seismic design of reinforced concrete and masonry buildings. United States of America: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1992.10.1002/9780470172841 ↗
9. Stoian V · Acta Tech Napocensis Civil Eng Architect · 2011 · 54 · 6
10. Coull A and Stafford Smith SB. Tall building structures: analysis and design. United States of America: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1991.
11. Fajfar P, Duhovnik J, Reflak J, et al. The behaviour of buildings and other structures during the earthquakes of 1979 in Montenegro. IKPIR publication no. 19A. University of Ljubljana, Slovenia, 1981.
12. 10.1193/1.158564510.1193/1.1585645 ↗
13. Kurama Y · ACI Struct J · 1999 · 96 · 622
14. Rahman A and Restrepo Jl. Earthquake resistant precast concrete buildings: seismic performance of cantilever walls prestressed using unbonded tendons. Christchurch, New Zealand: Department of Civil Engineering, University of Canterbury. Research rep. no 2000–5.
15. 10.15554/pcij.07012002.104.12110.15554/pcij.07012002.104.121 ↗
16. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2003)129:3(286)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2003)129:3(286) ↗
17. 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.000018310.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000183 ↗
18. ACI Committee 318. Building code requirements for structural concrete and Commentary . MI, USA: American Concrete Institute 38800 Country Club Drive Farmington Hills, 2008.
19. European Committee for Standardization (CEN). Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance-Part 1: General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings . Brussels: EUROPEAN COMMITIEE, 2004.
20. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2005.12.01110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2005.12.011 ↗
21. ASTM E 564-06. Standard practice for static load test for shear resistance of framed walls for buildings . West Conshohocken, PA, USA: ASTM International, 2012.
22. ASTM E 2126. Standard test methods for cyclic (Reversed) load test for shear resistance of walls for buildings . West Conshohocken, PA, USA: ASTM International, 2005.
23. Tomaževič M. Earthquake-resistant design of masonry buildings, Series on Innovation in Structures and Construction . Vol. 1, London: Imperial College Press, 1999.10.1142/9781848160835 ↗
24. Janardhana M. Cyclic behavior on glass fibre reinforced gypsum wall panels . IIT Madras, Chennai 2010.
25. Corley WG and Hanson JM. Design of earthquake-resistant structural walls. Fifth world conference on earthquake engineering , Rome 1973.
26. Shing PB, Schuller M and Hoskere VS. In-plane resistance of reinforced masonry Shear walls. J Struct Eng 1990; 116: 619–640.10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1990)116:3(619) ↗
27. Voon KC and Ingham JM. Experimental shear strength investigation of reinforced concrete masonry wall. J Struct Eng-ASCE 2006; 132: 400–408.10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2006)132:3(400) ↗