Numerical modelling of foam-core sandwich panels with nano-reinforced composite facesheets
Source abstract
Abstract
Sandwich composites with fibre-reinforced plastic facesheets and foam core have emerged as a major class of lightweight structural materials but low-velocity impact damage severely reduces the structural integrity of the component. Different methods have been proposed to improve the impact damage resistance of sandwich composites including the addition of nanoparticles to the matrix. The objective of this paper is to evaluate the effect of adding nanostrength, a block copolymer that self-assembles in the nanoscale, to the epoxy matrix on the low-velocity impact behaviour of sandwich panels with Kevlar facesheets and Rohacell foam core. Most previous studies on low-velocity impact damage used experimental testing but a combination of improved constitutive modelling of constituents and decreased computational costs make it possible to utilise continuum modelling to numerically simulate impact response of sandwich composites for a much wider range of conditions. A numerical model was developed in explicit FE software LS-Dyna and a constitutive law based on continuum damage mechanics was used for the simulation of the composite facesheets with and without the nano-reinforcements. A crushable foam model was used for the Rohacell foam core. The LS-Dyna model was validated by comparing the force, displacement measurements and damage assessment from the simulation with experimental impact tests conducted using a drop tower. The FE model shows good comparison with the experiment and a macroscopic phenomenological model is capable of capturing the impact damage behaviour of the sandwich plates with nano-reinforcements.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Cellular and Composite Structures · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Polymer composites and self-healing
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Arts et Métiers Paristech, I2M, CNRS UMR 5295, Talence, France
School of Engineering and Information Technology, University of New South Wales, Canberra ACT, Australia
Guangzhou University-Tamkang University Joint Research Center for Engineering Structure Disaster Prevention and Control, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou, China
References (35)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2009.09.01010.1016/j.compstruct.2009.09.010 ↗
2. 10.1016/0266-3538(88)90009-710.1016/0266-3538(88)90009-7 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.06.05110.1016/j.matdes.2013.06.051 ↗
4. 10.1177/073168441769342910.1177/0731684417693429 ↗
5. 10.1177/109963621774081610.1177/1099636217740816 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.10.02810.1016/j.compositesb.2012.10.028 ↗
7. 10.1039/C5NR01354B10.1039/C5NR01354B ↗
8. Barsotti R. · Annu Tech Conf · 2009 · 67 · 1337
9. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2011.11.02110.1016/j.compstruct.2011.11.021 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.05.02810.1016/j.compstruct.2014.05.028 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.12.00110.1016/j.compstruct.2013.12.001 ↗
12. 10.1080/1358826070148333410.1080/13588260701483334 ↗
13. 10.1108/0264440021041906710.1108/02644400210419067 ↗
14. 10.1504/IJAUTOC.2016.07809810.1504/IJAUTOC.2016.078098 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2018.05.00510.1016/j.ijsolstr.2018.05.005 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2011.12.02110.1016/j.compstruct.2011.12.021 ↗
17. 10.1177/002199830504673910.1177/0021998305046739 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2013.04.01010.1016/j.compositesa.2013.04.010 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.05.04110.1016/j.compstruct.2018.05.041 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.09.00210.1016/j.compstruct.2012.09.002 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2018.07.02210.1016/j.compositesa.2018.07.022 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.matdes.2004.11.01410.1016/j.matdes.2004.11.014 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2011.03.02810.1016/j.compstruct.2011.03.028 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.01.07010.1016/j.compositesb.2017.01.070 ↗
25. Feng Y · Adv Intell Syst Res · 2017 · 153 · 181
26. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.02.06410.1016/j.compstruct.2017.02.064 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.03.04810.1016/j.matdes.2016.03.048 ↗
28. Schweizerhof K, Weimar K, Munz T, et al. Crashworthiness analysis with enhanced composite material models in LS-Dyna – merits and limits. In: LS-Dyna world conference , Detroit, 1 June 1998.
29. LS-DYNA Manual I. Keywords user’s manual I . California, USA: Livermore Software Technology Corporation, 2012.
30. 10.1016/0167-6636(94)00053-010.1016/0167-6636(94)00053-0 ↗
31. Croop B, Lobo H, DatapointLabs N. Selecting material models for the simulation of foams in LS-DYNA. In: Proceedings of 7th LS-DYNA , Salzburg, 14 May 2009.
32. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.07.07810.1016/j.compstruct.2018.07.078 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.tws.2008.12.00410.1016/j.tws.2008.12.004 ↗
34. 10.1177/0021955X0809511310.1177/0021955X08095113 ↗
35. Dogan F · Cent Eur J Eng · 2012 · 2 · 612