journal article·2015-11

Mechanical characterization of asymmetric high density polyethylene/hemp composite sandwich panels with and without a foam core

Azam Kavianiboroujeni, Alain Cloutier, Denis Rodrigue

Publisher page

Abstract

This work investigates the effects of different design parameters such as hemp content in the skins (10–40% wt.), layer thickness (1 and 2 mm), and foaming agent content in the core (0% wt., 0.6% wt. and 1.2% wt.) on the flexural properties of three layer sandwich panels of hemp and high density polyethylene produced by compression molding. The results show that hemp content was the most significant parameter for the flexural properties of these panels. In addition, it was found that specific modulus and strength (per unit weight) were 30% and 36% higher when using a foam core, respectively.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Polymer Foaming and Composites · Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Cellular and Composite Structures

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemical Engineering, Université Laval, Quebec City, Canada

Department of Wood and Forest Sciences, Université Laval, Quebec City, Canada

References (25)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.proeng.2014.12.40110.1016/j.proeng.2014.12.401 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.matdes.2007.03.00310.1016/j.matdes.2007.03.003 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2008.04.01710.1016/j.compscitech.2008.04.017 ↗
4. 10.1017/CBO978113987832610.1017/CBO9781139878326 ↗
5. 10.1016/S0263-8223(98)00123-810.1016/S0263-8223(98)00123-8 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.matdes.2007.03.00310.1016/j.matdes.2007.03.003 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2013.06.00210.1016/j.compositesa.2013.06.002 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.11.01610.1016/j.compstruct.2013.11.016 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2009.09.04610.1016/j.compstruct.2009.09.046 ↗
10. 10.1016/S0266-3538(00)00039-710.1016/S0266-3538(00)00039-7 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.matdes.2014.09.05910.1016/j.matdes.2014.09.059 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2010.05.00410.1016/j.compstruct.2010.05.004 ↗
13. 10.1177/002199831036957710.1177/0021998310369577 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2006.07.00210.1016/j.compstruct.2006.07.002 ↗
15. 10.1002/pen.76030201010.1002/pen.760302010 ↗
16. 10.1115/1.290212210.1115/1.2902122 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2005.07.00510.1016/j.polymertesting.2005.07.005 ↗
18. Klempner D · 2004
19. 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.03.01610.1016/j.matdes.2013.03.016 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.msea.2006.05.13310.1016/j.msea.2006.05.133 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2004.05.01310.1016/j.compstruct.2004.05.013 ↗
22. 10.1002/app.3033510.1002/app.30335 ↗
23. Tissandier C · J Mater Sci Eng · 2012 · 11 · 662
24. 10.1177/0021955X1452819110.1177/0021955X14528191 ↗
25. 10.1002/adv.2026710.1002/adv.20267 ↗