Acoustic behavior of sandwich plates
Source abstract
Abstract
Sandwich structures of honeycomb cores and carbon laminate face sheets are ideal to meet low-weight and high-stiffness specifications. However, these structures are susceptible to noise problems. They tend to radiate structure-borne sound very efficiently or be transparent for air-borne sound. The problem’s root is the coincidence frequency, at which the wavelengths of beam and air coincide. In the vicinity of the coincidence frequency, observing wave fields with slanted incidence, the air’s trace wavelength can match the beam’s wavelength. Unlike homogenous structures, where wave trace matching only occurs in a narrow frequency band, sandwich structures can display this effect in a more than two decade wide frequency region. This facilitates noise transmission in a wide frequency band. The first focus of this paper is how to avoid this problem in the first place by designing the sandwich adequately. To check the region of wave trace matching, dispersion curves are used. A simplified but sufficiently accurate dispersion curve is proposed. The second focus lies in the interpretation of the dispersion curve, i.e. what is physically happening in the beam structure. The third focus is placed on the experimental identification of the sandwich beam structure’s shell parameters including its damping. Special attention is placed on which measures are necessary and which not in the experimental setup and experimental procedure to achieve sufficiently accurate results.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Cellular and Composite Structures · Acoustic Wave Phenomena Research · Material Properties and Processing
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
VIRTUAL VEHICLE Research Center, Graz, Austria
References (20)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1006/jsvi.1997.127810.1006/jsvi.1997.1278 ↗
2. Timoshenko S. Strength of materials, Part I, 2nd ed. New York: D. van Nostrand Company, 1940, pp. 134–134.
3. 10.1016/j.jsv.2004.12.01910.1016/j.jsv.2004.12.019 ↗
4. 10.1006/jsvi.1997.118910.1006/jsvi.1997.1189 ↗
5. Awad ZK, Aravinthan T, Zhuge Y, et al. Investigation of frequency characteristics of GFRP/phenolic sandwich beams. In: Southern region engineering conference 2010 (SREC 2010) , Curran Associates Inc., Australia, 2010.
6. Boudjemai A, Bouanane MH, Mankour R, MDA of hexagonal honeycomb plates used for space applications 2012; Vol. 6, No. 6, World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, pp. 204–212.
7. 10.1006/jsvi.1998.190310.1006/jsvi.1998.1903 ↗
8. Kumar S. Sound transmission properties of honeycomb panels and double-walled structures . PhD Thesis, KTH Stockholm, Sweden, 2012.
9. 10.1121/1.42214810.1121/1.422148 ↗
10. 10.1006/jsvi.2001.400710.1006/jsvi.2001.4007 ↗
11. 10.1016/0022-460X(90)90705-510.1016/0022-460X(90)90705-5 ↗
12. Moeser M, Kropp W. Koerperschall – physikalische Grundlagen und technische Anwendungen [Structure borne sound – physical principles and technical applications], 3rd ed. Berlin: Springer, 2009, pp. 170–173. [In German].
13. DIN 53440 Part 1 · 1984
14. DIN 53440 Part 2 · 1984
15. DIN 53440 Part 3 · 1984
16. 10.1016/S0003-682X(99)00051-110.1016/S0003-682X(99)00051-1 ↗
17. 10.1007/978-3-662-22602-510.1007/978-3-662-22602-5 ↗
18. 10.1017/CBO978113987832610.1017/CBO9781139878326 ↗
19. 10.1515/978348678428210.1515/9783486784282 ↗
20. 10.2140/jomms.2006.1.58110.2140/jomms.2006.1.581 ↗