Accurate equivalent models of sandwich laminates with honeycomb core and composite face sheets via optimization involving modal behavior
Source abstract
Abstract
An approach is introduced for determining accurate two-dimensional equivalent laminated models of sandwich laminates with honeycomb core and composite facesheets by optimization involving modal behavior. The approach relies on minimizing the objective function which is defined as the sum of the square of the differences between the natural frequencies of the honeycomb sandwich laminate estimated by the finite element analysis of the 3D detailed model with the actual honeycomb core geometry and by the 2D equivalent laminated model with the honeycomb core replaced by the equivalent 2D orthotropic material model. Equivalent elastic constants of the 2D orthotropic model of the honeycomb core are defined as the design variables of the optimization problem, and a finite element solver and genetic algorithm-based optimizer are coupled to perform the optimization task. Results show that with the optimization-based approach, very accurate 2D equivalent models of honeycomb sandwich laminates are obtained compared to equivalent models obtained by replacing the honeycomb core with elastic constants of the 2D orthotropic material model obtained utilizing analytical models available in the literature.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Cellular and Composite Structures · Composite Structure Analysis and Optimization · Mechanical Behavior of Composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Aselsan Inc., Ankara, Turkey
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey
Department of Aerospace Engineering, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey
References (19)
Show source-provided references
1. HexWeb Honeycomb attributes and properties, http://www.hexcel.com (2012, accessed 19 November 2015).
2. 10.1016/S0263-8231(99)00026-910.1016/S0263-8231(99)00026-9 ↗
3. Bezazi A, Harkati AEH, Azari Z, et al. Numerical approach using the homogenization technique for the determination of the elastic constants of the honeycomb sandwich composite. In: 7th International conference on composite science and technology , Sharjah, UAE, 20–22 January 2009.
4. 10.1108/eb03302610.1108/eb033026 ↗
5. 10.1016/0020-7683(93)90233-W10.1016/0020-7683(93)90233-W ↗
6. Masters I · Compos Laminate · 1996 · 35 · 403
7. 10.1017/CBO978113987832610.1017/CBO9781139878326 ↗
8. Rahman H, Jamshed R, Hameed H, et al. Finite element analysis (FEA) of honeycomb sandwich laminate for continuum properties evaluation and core height influence on the dynamic behavior. In: The international bhurban conference on applied sciences& technology , Islamabad, Pakistan, 11–14 January 2010.
9. Foo CC · Compos Laminate · 2006 · 80 · 588
10. 10.1016/S0045-7825(96)01196-610.1016/S0045-7825(96)01196-6 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.matdes.2011.09.01210.1016/j.matdes.2011.09.012 ↗
12. 10.1006/jsvi.1997.118910.1006/jsvi.1997.1189 ↗
13. Nast E. On honeycomb-type core moduli. In: 38th Laminates, structural dynamics and materials conference , Kissimmee, FL, USA, 7–10 April 1997.10.2514/6.1997-1178 ↗
14. MD/MSC Nastran 2010 Dynamic Analysis User’s Guide , MSC Software Corporation, https://simcompanion.mscsoftware.com/infocenter/index?page=content&id=DOC9468&cat=MSC__MD_NASTRAN_DOCUMENTATION&actp=LIST (2010).
15. Kassapoglou C · 2010
16. Farrugia S. Comparison of honeycomb laminate models. Technical report, Astrium GmbH, 2003.
17. Reeves C. Genetic algorithms . Coventry University, 2005.
18. Soremekun G. Genetic algorithms for composite laminate design and optimization . Master’s thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 1997.
19. Çınar O. Evaluation of equivalent elastic properties of honeycomb sanwich laminates by optimization involving modal behavior . Master’s thesis, Middle East Technical University, 2014.