Compressive behavior and deformation mechanism of 3D-printed negative poisson’s ratio lattice-frame materials
Source abstract
Abstract
Lattice-frame sandwich structures are widely used due to lightweight, high specific strength and potential multifunctions. The additive manufacturing technology further expends their designability and applicability in modern manufacturing industry, better realizing the integration of design, manufacturing and function. The reentrant lattice-frame materials generally show special negative Poisson’s ratio behavior and excellent energy absorption characteristics. In this paper, a 3D NPR lattice-frame sandwich structure is constructed by the orthogonal arrangement of 2D reentrant hexagonal honeycomb using the selective laser sintering 3D-printing. The reusable parent material and printing quality are characterized. The mechanical behaviors and fracture morphology of printing specimens are studied to explore the interlayer mechanism and potential effect of layer-by-layer printing. The uniaxial compression behaviors and energy absorption characteristics of NPR lattice-frame structures are analyzed by experimental and numerical methods. The influences of geometric parameters on mechanical property and failure mode are revealed. The negative Poisson’s ratio effect released during the deformation evolution of the structure can obviously improve the defamation tolerance and energy-absorbing capability.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Cellular and Composite Structures · Advanced Materials and Mechanics · Polymer composites and self-healing
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Changchun University of Technology
FAM Tooling Die Manufacturing Co., Ltd
Funding
Jilin Provincial Scientific and Technological Development Program
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. Veselago VG. The electrodynamics of substances with simultaneously negative values of ε and μ. Phys-usp+ 1968; 10: 509–514.
2. 10.1038/nphys180410.1038/nphys1804 ↗
3. 10.1002/pssb.20098204210.1002/pssb.200982042 ↗
4. 10.1038/nmat304310.1038/nmat3043 ↗
5. 10.1063/1.295160010.1063/1.2951600 ↗
6. 10.1177/1687813222108287210.1177/16878132221082872 ↗
7. 10.1088/2631-7990/ace66810.1088/2631-7990/ace668 ↗
8. Lu C, Hsieh MT, Huang ZF, et al. Architectural design and additive manufacturing of mechanical metamaterials: a Review. Engineering-PRC 2022; 17: 44–63.
9. 10.1016/0020-7403(94)00047-N10.1016/0020-7403(94)00047-N ↗
10. 10.1155/2013/58921610.1155/2013/589216 ↗
11. 10.5545/sv-jme.2016.365610.5545/sv-jme.2016.3656 ↗
12. 10.2478/s13536-013-0140-610.2478/s13536-013-0140-6 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.12.00310.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.12.003 ↗
14. Gibson LJ, Ashby MF, Schajer GS, et al. The mechanics of two-dimensional cellular materials. P Roy Soc A: Math Phys 1982; 382: 25–42.
15. 10.1007/BF0004253110.1007/BF00042531 ↗
16. 10.1016/S0263-8223(96)00054-210.1016/S0263-8223(96)00054-2 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2020.09.00310.1016/j.ijsolstr.2020.09.003 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.mechmat.2020.10366110.1016/j.mechmat.2020.103661 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.matdes.2017.11.02410.1016/j.matdes.2017.11.024 ↗
20. 10.1002/pssb.20155276910.1002/pssb.201552769 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.matdes.2014.11.03310.1016/j.matdes.2014.11.033 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.11.03610.1016/j.compstruct.2015.11.036 ↗
23. 10.1088/1361-665X/aa819e10.1088/1361-665X/aa819e ↗
24. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.11515410.1016/j.compstruct.2021.115154 ↗
25. 10.1088/1361-665X/acb1e410.1088/1361-665X/acb1e4 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2024.11862310.1016/j.compstruct.2024.118623 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.11559110.1016/j.compstruct.2022.115591 ↗
28. 10.1002/pc.2761210.1002/pc.27612 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2024.10505710.1016/j.ijimpeng.2024.105057 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.tws.2024.11248310.1016/j.tws.2024.112483 ↗
31. 10.1039/D4MH01173B10.1039/D4MH01173B ↗
32. 10.1177/1099636223122255310.1177/10996362231222553 ↗
33. Zhang L, Zhou LR, Tang GP, et al. Additive manufacture of metamaterials: a review. J Aeronaut Mater 2018; 38: 10–19.
34. 10.1016/j.addma.2020.10156210.1016/j.addma.2020.101562 ↗