Experimental and simulation study of the crashworthiness behavior of thickness-graded auxetic structures of ductile and brittle materials
Source abstract
Abstract
This article examines the compressive behavior of re-entrant auxetic structures to optimize its energy absorption. The unique properties of auxetic structures have made them popular in various industries, especially for sports equipment. This study aims to create different types of structures using an FDM 3D printer. First, an appropriate raster angle for 3D printing of tensile test samples is examined for PLA and PLA+ materials. Next, three types of structures are constructed using brittle PLA and ductile PLA+ materials, and their energy absorption is compared. These structures are homogeneous auxetic re-entrant (HAR), unilateral graded thickness (UGT), and bilateral graded thickness (BGT). Changing from brittle (PLA) to soft material (PLA+) increases energy absorption in all structures. Likewise, grading the thickness of the structure, especially on BGT, increases energy absorption. Simulation results are validated by modeling the structures in two ways for brittle and ductile materials using Abaqus software. Finally, based on the simulation results, the most appropriate step of the bilateral graded thickness is recognized as 0.8-1-1.2.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Cellular and Composite Structures · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Mechanical Engineering Department, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran
References (27)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1080/0951192X.2017.140745610.1080/0951192X.2017.1407456 ↗
2. Lu G · 2003
3. 10.3390/app806094110.3390/app8060941 ↗
4. 10.1177/109963621561853910.1177/1099636215618539 ↗
5. Tory M · 2021
6. 10.1016/0160-9327(91)90123-S10.1016/0160-9327(91)90123-S ↗
7. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.09.07610.1016/j.compstruct.2017.09.076 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.matdes.2019.10803610.1016/j.matdes.2019.108036 ↗
9. 10.1177/109963622092465710.1177/1099636220924657 ↗
10. 10.1177/109963622097545010.1177/1099636220975450 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.10943710.1016/j.compositesb.2021.109437 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.11198410.1016/j.engstruct.2021.111984 ↗
13. 10.3390/ma1406136610.3390/ma14061366 ↗
14. 10.1023/A:102168800946110.1023/A:1021688009461 ↗
15. 10.1007/s42417-020-00236-z10.1007/s42417-020-00236-z ↗
16. 10.1088/1361-665X/aaa3cf10.1088/1361-665X/aaa3cf ↗
17. 10.1016/j.msea.2019.04.11610.1016/j.msea.2019.04.116 ↗
18. 10.3390/ma1602074510.3390/ma16020745 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2023.10859710.1016/j.ijmecsci.2023.108597 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.02.01210.1016/j.compositesb.2018.02.012 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.10734110.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107341 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.05.02010.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.05.020 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.01.02510.1016/j.compositesb.2019.01.025 ↗
24. https://www.esun3d.com/pla-pro-product/
25. International A · 2014
26. 10.1016/S0734-743X(00)00060-910.1016/S0734-743X(00)00060-9 ↗
27. 10.1177/0021955X0606351910.1177/0021955X06063519 ↗