Core failure in sandwich structures subjected to water slamming loads
Source abstract
Abstract
Sandwich composite materials are widely used within the marine industry, particularly as hull panels. Water impact loads, known as slamming, can be very significant for these structures, particularly for high-speed craft. These loadings generate local regions of high transverse shear forces near panel boundaries, which can result in transverse shear failures of core materials. The transient nature of slamming loads can cause stress rates that are high enough to affect the strength of the core material, particularly for polymeric foams. Despite the significant body of work on the constitutive behaviour and failure mechanics of sandwich core materials, there is a lack of understanding of how core materials fail in transverse shear during slamming events. There is also only very limited knowledge of how the core shear strengths measured using standardised, often quasi-static material coupon testing relate to their behaviour in a panel-slamming situation. This paper contributes in two novel areas; controlled experimental characterisation of the failure mechanics of sandwich panels subjected to water slamming to understand and quantify the strength of different polymeric core materials, comparison of the failure modes and transverse shear strength of slam-loaded sandwich panels to predictions from material coupon properties. Core types include low, medium and high elongation polymeric foams. The results demonstrate that the more ductile foams perform better as panel structures under slamming relative to their quasi-static properties compared with the more brittle cores. Prediction of the strength of a panel is shown to be highly dependent on the load distribution and whether the static or dynamic core strength is considered. The results support empirical experience that ductile foams perform well under slamming loads, and that high-elongation materials can perform better in slamming situations than predicted by their quasi-static strengths.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fluid Dynamics Simulations and Interactions · Structural Integrity and Reliability Analysis · Mechanical Behavior of Composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Engineering Science, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
Funding
Office of Naval Research Global · Ministry for Business Innovation and Employment
References (36)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1023/B:engi.0000018188.68304.ae10.1023/B:engi.0000018188.68304.ae ↗
2. Von Karman T. · 1929
3. Wagner H. · 1931
4. 10.1017/S002211209300028X10.1017/S002211209300028X ↗
5. Stavovy AB · J Ship Res · 1976 · 20 · 19010.5957/jsr.1976.20.4.190 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2008.06.01210.1016/j.oceaneng.2008.06.012 ↗
7. Breder J. · 2005
8. Stenius I · 2006
9. 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.04.01210.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.04.012 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2011.08.01610.1016/j.compstruct.2011.08.016 ↗
11. Hayman B. · Compos Mater Marit Struct · 1993 · 2 · 161
12. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.06.00110.1016/j.compstruct.2016.06.001 ↗
13. Veritas DN · 2005
14. 10.1016/0951-8339(90)90006-D10.1016/0951-8339(90)90006-D ↗
15. American Bureau of Shipping · 2018
16. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2014.09.02210.1016/j.ijsolstr.2014.09.022 ↗
17. Samuel JS, Allen T, Battley M. The effect of thickness variation on the transverse shear strength of Nomex honeycomb cores. In: 21st international conference on composite materials – ICCM21 , Xi’an, China, August 20-25 2017.
18. 10.1016/S1359-6454(01)00058-110.1016/S1359-6454(01)00058-1 ↗
19. 10.1016/S1359-835X(01)00110-510.1016/S1359-835X(01)00110-5 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2004.01.02110.1016/j.compstruct.2004.01.021 ↗
21. 10.1177/109963621038684710.1177/1099636210386847 ↗
22. Clark SD, Shenoi RA, Allen HG. Influence of impact damage and repair schemes on the strength of foam-cored sandwich beams. In: International conference on composite materials, ICCM-11 , Gold Coast, Australia, 14-18 July 1997.
23. 10.1177/109963620910453210.1177/1099636209104532 ↗
24. 10.1080/13588265.2012.74569210.1080/13588265.2012.745692 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2006.12.01710.1016/j.ijsolstr.2006.12.017 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.msea.2004.09.01210.1016/j.msea.2004.09.012 ↗
27. 10.1177/073168441350942410.1177/0731684413509424 ↗
28. 10.1007/s11340-011-9466-310.1007/s11340-011-9466-3 ↗
29. 10.1177/002199830404239010.1177/0021998304042390 ↗
30. 10.1177/109963621876131510.1177/1099636218761315 ↗
31. ASTM, Ed. C273 – 00 standard test method for shear properties of sandwich core materials.
32. ASTM, Ed. C393 – 00 Standard test method for flexural properties of sandwich constructions.
33. Burman M · Spectrum · 2010
34. Battley M · Exp Mech · 201
35. ISO, Ed. Hull construction – scantlings – part 5: design pressures for monuhulls, design stresses, scantlings determination. 2004.
36. Zenkert D. · 1995