Tensile elongation of unidirectional or laminated composites combining a brittle reinforcement with a ductile strain and strain-rate hardening matrix
Source abstract
Abstract
We use the long-wavelength model of Hutchinson and Neale (1977) and Ghosh (1977) to estimate the uniform tensile elongation of two-phase composites deforming quasistatically according to the equistrain rule of mixtures, in which one phase is ductile while the other fractures progressively according to two-parameter Weibull statistics. We use shear-lag models in the literature to quantify load transfer from the ductile phase to the fractured brittle phase, and to estimate the influence of matrix strain and strain-rate hardening, of brittle phase fracture characteristics, and of phase volume and strength ratios, on the composite strain to failure as dictated by the onset of unstable necking. Calculations show that strain and strain-rate hardening of the ductile phase do relatively little to increase the ductility of the composite. Two parameters play a dominant role, namely the brittle-phase Weibull modulus and a dimensionless parameter describing load transfer across the two phases. The main practical implication of this analysis is that, to produce reasonably ductile two-phase composites, the best strategy is to aim for small layer thicknesses. (C) 2014 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior · Microstructure and mechanical properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (60)
Show source-provided references
1. Hull · 1996
2. Chawla · 2012
3. Embury · Annu Rev Mater Res · 2010 · 40 · 21310.1146/annurev-matsci-070909-104438 ↗
4. Mortensen · Annu Rev Mater Res · 2010 · 40 · 24310.1146/annurev-matsci-070909-104511 ↗
5. Fuwa · J Mater Sci · 1975 · 10 · 206210.1007/BF00557484 ↗
6. Rossoll · Scripta Mater · 2008 · 59 · 84210.1016/j.scriptamat.2008.06.027 ↗
7. Rossoll · Compos Part A: Appl Sci Manuf · 2012 · 43 · 12910.1016/j.compositesa.2011.09.027 ↗
8. Hauert · J Mech Phys Solids · 2009 · 57 · 47310.1016/j.jmps.2008.11.006 ↗
9. Kouzeli · Acta Mater · 2001 · 49 · 369910.1016/S1359-6454(01)00279-8 ↗
10. Brockenbrough · Acta Metall · 1995 · 43 · 1110.1016/0956-7151(95)90256-2 ↗
11. Lesuer · Int Mater Rev · 1996 · 41 · 16910.1179/imr.1996.41.5.169 ↗
12. Hutchinson · Acta Metall · 1977 · 25 · 83910.1016/0001-6160(77)90168-7 ↗
13. Hutchinson JW, Obrecht H. In: Proceedings of the 4th international conference on fracture, vol. 1; 1977. p. 101.10.1016/B978-0-08-022136-6.50018-4 ↗
14. Ghosh · Acta Metall · 1977 · 25 · 141310.1016/0001-6160(77)90072-4 ↗
15. Çetin · Acta Mater · 2012 · 60 · 226510.1016/j.actamat.2011.12.041 ↗
16. Curtin · Adv Appl Mech · 1999 · 36 · 16310.1016/S0065-2156(08)70186-8 ↗
17. Statistical strength theory for fibrous composite materials
18. Hui · J Mech Phys Solids · 1995 · 43 · 155110.1016/0022-5096(95)00045-K ↗
19. Neumeister · J Mech Phys Solids · 1993 · 41 · 138310.1016/0022-5096(93)90085-T ↗
20. Kelly · 1986
21. Wachtman · 1996
22. Meyers · 2009
23. Curtin · J Am Ceram Soc · 1991 · 45 · 283710.1111/j.1151-2916.1991.tb06852.x ↗
24. Curtin · J Mater Sci · 1991 · 26 · 523910.1007/BF01143218 ↗
25. Tejedor · Scripta Mater · 2008 · 59 · 63110.1016/j.scriptamat.2008.05.024 ↗
26. Lin · Scripta Metall · 1986 · 20 · 14310.1016/0036-9748(86)90229-2 ↗
27. Miles · Metall Trans A · 1993 · 24A · 114310.1007/BF02657245 ↗
28. Gao · Int J Fract · 1999 · 92 · 17510.1023/A:1007521530191 ↗
29. Yamashita · J ASTM Int · 2013 · 5 · 110.1520/JAI101524 ↗
30. Esposito · Eng Fract Mech · 2007 · 74 · 54910.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.07.002 ↗
31. Tiryakioğlu · Metall Mater Trans A · 2010 · 41 · 312110.1007/s11661-010-0364-6 ↗
32. Zahedi · Metall Mater Trans A · 2007 · 38 · 65910.1007/s11661-006-9068-3 ↗
33. Baer · Eng Fract Mech · 2009 · 76 · 102410.1016/j.engfracmech.2009.01.005 ↗
34. Green · Mater Sci Eng A · 1993 · 173 · 26110.1016/0921-5093(93)90226-5 ↗
35. Eisaabadi · Mater Sci Eng A · 2013 · 579 · 6410.1016/j.msea.2013.05.014 ↗
36. Cias · Powder Metall · 2010 · 53 · 32810.1179/003258910X12678035166737 ↗
37. Klein · Opt Eng · 2011 · 50 · 110.1117/1.3541804 ↗
38. Klein · Proc SPIE · 2001 · 4375 · 24110.1117/12.439181 ↗
39. Klein · Opt Eng · 2002 · 41 · 315110.1117/1.1497398 ↗
40. Klein · J Appl Phys · 2007 · 101 · 110.1063/1.2749337 ↗
41. Klein · J Appl Phys · 2008 · 104 · 1
42. Klein · Opt Eng · 2010 · 49 · 110.1117/1.3484946 ↗
43. Xu · Mater Sci Eng A · 1993 · 171 · 24910.1016/0921-5093(93)90412-8 ↗
44. Ramamurty · Compos Sci Technol · 2005 · 65 · 181510.1016/j.compscitech.2005.03.010 ↗
45. Hager · J Mater Sci · 2002 · 37 · 130910.1023/A:1014552008442 ↗
46. Chang · Key Eng Mater · 2006 · 326–328 · 93110.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.326-328.931 ↗
47. Knott · Struct Integr Fract · 2004 · 1
48. Lambrigger · J Mater Sci · 1999 · 34 · 445710.1023/A:1004681003889 ↗
49. Gao · J Mater Res · 2011 · 26 · 208710.1557/jmr.2011.210 ↗
50. Lambrigger · J Mater Sci · 1999 · 34 · 444710.1023/A:1004676919819 ↗
51. Curtin · Acta Mater · 1998 · 46 · 340910.1016/S1359-6454(98)00041-X ↗
52. Ji · Mater Sci Eng A · 2013 · 566 · 11910.1016/j.msea.2012.12.079 ↗
53. Beleznai · J Nucl Mater · 2010 · 406 · 11910.1016/j.jnucmat.2010.04.027 ↗
54. Gao · Eng Fract Mech · 2005 · 72 · 241610.1016/j.engfracmech.2005.03.001 ↗
55. Niranjani · Mater Sci Eng A · 2009 · 515 · 16910.1016/j.msea.2009.03.077 ↗
56. Wadley · Compos Eng · 1995 · 5 · 93510.1016/0961-9526(95)00034-K ↗
57. Dislocations in metal matrix composites
58. Inoue · Scripta Mater · 2008 · 59 · 105510.1016/j.scriptamat.2008.07.020 ↗
59. Nambu · Compos Sci Technol · 2009 · 69 · 193610.1016/j.compscitech.2009.04.013 ↗
60. Koseki · Mater Trans Jpn Inst Metals Mater · 2014 · 55 · 227