journal article·2019-06Open access

Experimental and numerical study of the response to various impact energy levels for composite sandwich plates with different face thicknesses

Moeen S Rajput, Magnus Burman, Fredrik Forsberg, Stefan Hallström

Abstract

Composite sandwich structures find wide application in the aerospace sector thanks to their lightweight characteristics. However, composite structures are highly susceptible to low-velocity impact damage and therefore thorough characterization of the impact response and damage process for the used material configurations is necessary. The present study investigates the effect of face-sheet thickness on the impact response and damage mechanisms, experimentally and numerically. A uni-directional, non-crimp fabric is used as reinforcement in the face-sheets, and a closed cell Rohacell 200 Hero polymer foam is used as core material. Low-velocity impact tests are performed in a novel instrumented drop-weight rig that is able to capture the true impact response. A range of impact energies are initially utilized in order to identify when low level damage (LLD), barely visible impact damage (BVID) and visible impact damage (VID) occur. A thorough fractography investigation is performed to characterize the impact damage using both destructive and non-destructive testing. The damage from the impacts in terms of dent depth, peak contact force, deflection and absorbed energy is measured. The results show bilinear responses in dent depth vs. impact energy and absorbed energy vs. impact energy. It is found than the BVID energy works well as an indication for the onset of excessive damage. Fractography reveals that there is a failure mode shift between the LLD and the VID energy levels, and that delaminations predominantly grow along the fiber direction and rotate in a spiral pattern through the thickness, following the laminate ply orientations. Finally, a progressive damage finite element model is developed to simulate both the impact response and the delamination extent, incorporating both intra-laminar and inter-laminar damage modes. The simulation shows good agreement with the experiments.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Structural Analysis of Composite Materials · Material Properties and Processing

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Aeronautical and Vehicle Engineering, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden

Division of Fluid and Experimental Mechanics, Luleå University of Technology, Luleå, Sweden

Funding

VINNOVA

References (33)

Show source-provided references
1. Zenkert D. An introduction to sandwich construction. UK: Engineering Materials Advisory Services, 1995.
2. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.05.02610.1016/j.compscitech.2005.05.026 ↗
3. 10.1177/109963620300500158410.1177/1099636203005001584 ↗
4. 10.1177/109963620300500158510.1177/1099636203005001585 ↗
5. 10.1115/1.310168910.1115/1.3101689 ↗
6. Chai GB, Zhu S. A review of low-velocity impact on sandwich structures. Proc Inst Mech Eng L 2011; 225: 207–230.
7. 10.1177/109963621561377510.1177/1099636215613775 ↗
8. 10.1177/109963621769050010.1177/1099636217690500 ↗
9. 10.1016/S0263-8223(00)00098-210.1016/S0263-8223(00)00098-2 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2017.09.01610.1016/j.polymertesting.2017.09.016 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2009.02.00910.1016/j.compscitech.2009.02.009 ↗
12. 10.1177/109963621348402710.1177/1099636213484027 ↗
13. 10.1177/002199831453359710.1177/0021998314533597 ↗
14. 10.1177/002199831348407410.1177/0021998313484074 ↗
15. 10.1177/073168440910274910.1177/0731684409102749 ↗
16. 10.1177/109963621665326710.1177/1099636216653267 ↗
17. 10.1007/s10443-005-1119-110.1007/s10443-005-1119-1 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.dib.2016.01.01010.1016/j.dib.2016.01.010 ↗
19. Technical Standard ASTM D7136/D7136M-15. Standard test method for measuring the damage resistance of a fiber-reinforced polymer matrix composite to a drop-weight impact event. ASTM Digital Library 2015.
20. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.04.02210.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.04.022 ↗
21. AC 25.571-1D – damage tolerance and fatigue evaluation of structure – document information www.faa.gov/regulations_policies/advisory_circulars/index.cfm/go/document.information/documentID/865446 (accessed 18 January 2018).
22. 10.1016/j.proeng.2011.10.02810.1016/j.proeng.2011.10.028 ↗
23. ISO 18352:2009 – carbon-fibre-reinforced plastics – determination of compression-after-impact properties at a specified impact-energy level www.iso.org/standard/38658.html (2009 accessed 28 February 2019).
24. 10.1111/j.1365-2818.1982.tb00376.x10.1111/j.1365-2818.1982.tb00376.x ↗
25. 10.1126/science.237.4821.143910.1126/science.237.4821.1439 ↗
26. 10.1179/1743280413Y.000000002310.1179/1743280413Y.0000000023 ↗
27. ABAQUS 6.13 Hibbit Carlsson and Sorensen 2003.
28. 10.1177/00219983730070040410.1177/002199837300700404 ↗
29. 10.1115/1.315366410.1115/1.3153664 ↗
30. Camanho PP, Davila CG. Mixed-mode decohesion finite elements for the simulation of delamination in composite materials. NASA/TM-2002–211737. 2002; 1–37.
31. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.08.02510.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.08.025 ↗
32. 10.1016/0008-8846(76)90007-710.1016/0008-8846(76)90007-7 ↗
33. 10.1016/0266-3538(96)00005-X10.1016/0266-3538(96)00005-X ↗