Parametric study on factors influencing the stiffness of honeycomb sandwich panels using impulse excitation technique
Source abstract
Abstract
Metallic thermal protection systems are used to protect the airframe and pay load from aerodynamic and aerothermal heating in hypersonic cruise vehicles that are powered with advanced scramjet engines. Metallic thermal protection systems is a composite structure that contains honeycomb sandwich panels at the top and bottom and a variety of thermal insulating materials placed in between them. Several design factors influence the structural and thermal performance of the honeycomb sandwich panels. Panel bending stiffness is one important structural property that is generally estimated using a destructive 3-point or 4-point bending test. In this study, a numerical model based on the impulse excitation nondestructive evaluation technique has been developed to estimate the effect of various design parameters that affect the bending stiffness of the honeycomb sandwich panels. The results obtained are analyzed using standard statistical procedures. A major advantage of this method lies in evaluating the panel stiffness at the design stage without resorting to actual fabrication of the panels for destructive testing.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Wind and Air Flow Studies · Cellular and Composite Structures · Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Nondestructive Testing Group, Materials Science Division-I, Defence Metallurgical Research Laboratory, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
Near Net Shape Group, Aeronautical Materials Division, Defence Metallurgical Research Laboratory, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
References (23)
Show source-provided references
1. Kerrebrock JL · 1992
2. 10.1017/CBO978051162701910.1017/CBO9780511627019 ↗
3. Dorsey JT, Poteet CC, Chen RR, et al. Metallic thermal protection system technology development: Concepts, Requirements and assessment overview. In: 40th aerospace science meeting & exhibit , Reno, NV, USA, 2002.10.2514/6.2002-502 ↗
4. 10.2514/4.10171710.2514/4.101717 ↗
5. Blosser ML · 1998
6. 10.2514/1.917910.2514/1.9179 ↗
7. Blosser ML. Investigation of fundamental modeling and thermal performance issues for a metallic thermal protection system design. In: 40th aerospace science meeting & exhibit , Reno, NV, USA, 2002.10.2514/6.2002-503 ↗
8. 10.1177/073168440506056710.1177/0731684405060567 ↗
9. 10.1177/073168440605828810.1177/0731684406058288 ↗
10. 10.1784/insi.2014.57.3.14010.1784/insi.2014.57.3.140 ↗
11. 10.1007/s11666-009-9440-010.1007/s11666-009-9440-0 ↗
12. Viens MJ and Johnson JJ. Determination of elastic moduli of fiber-resin composite using an impulse excitation technique. NASA Technical Memorandum 104629, February 1996.
13. Haynes® 263. Product data sheet. Kokomo, IN: Haynes International, 2000.
14. 10.1016/j.matdes.2009.10.05810.1016/j.matdes.2009.10.058 ↗
15. Roy RK · 1990
16. Taguchi G · 2005
17. Ross PJ · 1986
18. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2015.12.02810.1016/j.ijadhadh.2015.12.028 ↗
19. Bollen B. The innovative impulse excitation technique: A new approach for non-destructive evaluation of material properties. In: Proceedings of ATCOM 2011 , Ranchi, India, 5–7 July 2011.
20. 10.1061/(ASCE)0893-1321(2006)19:3(177)10.1061/(ASCE)0893-1321(2006)19:3(177) ↗
21. Nayak SK. Optimization of honeycomb sandwich panel to mitigate the effects of air blast loading . Master Thesis, The Pennsylvania State University, USA, 2010.
22. 10.1177/109963620910289110.1177/1099636209102891 ↗
23. ASTM E1876-15:2015. Standard test method for dynamic Young’s modulus, shear modulus and Poisson’s ratio by impulse excitation of vibration . West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM, 2015.