Experimental assessment of the Refined Zigzag Theory for the static bending analysis of sandwich beams
Source abstract
Abstract
In the present work, for the first time, the accuracy of the Refined Zigzag Theory in reproducing the static bending response of sandwich beams is experimentally assessed. The theory is briefly reviewed and an analytical solution of the equilibrium equations is presented for the boundary and loading conditions under investigation (four-point bending). The experimental campaign is described, including the material characterization and the bending tests. The experimentally measured deflections and axial strains are compared with those provided by Refined Zigzag Theory and by the Timoshenko Beam Theory with an ad hoc shear correction factor. The Refined Zigzag Theory is shown to be more accurate than the Timoshenko Beam Theory, in particular for beams with higher face-to-core thickness and stiffness ratios and with a reduced slenderness.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Composite Structure Analysis and Optimization · Structural Analysis and Optimization · Structural Load-Bearing Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Politecnico di Torino, Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Corso Duca degli Abruzzi 24, 10129 Torino, Italy
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1115/1.310192310.1115/1.3101923 ↗
2. 10.1016/S0020-7683(00)00246-810.1016/S0020-7683(00)00246-8 ↗
3. 10.1002/cnm.163003030310.1002/cnm.1630030303 ↗
4. 10.1007/BF0117464710.1007/BF01174647 ↗
5. Plantema FJ · 1966
6. 10.1016/B978-0-08-012870-2.50012-210.1016/B978-0-08-012870-2.50012-2 ↗
7. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1992)118:5(1026)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1992)118:5(1026) ↗
8. 10.1016/0045-7949(85)90155-510.1016/0045-7949(85)90155-5 ↗
9. 10.1016/0263-8223(92)90003-U10.1016/0263-8223(92)90003-U ↗
10. 10.1177/002199830809773010.1177/0021998308097730 ↗
11. 10.2140/jomms.2010.5.34110.2140/jomms.2010.5.341 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2011.05.01510.1016/j.compstruct.2011.05.015 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.cma.2011.11.02310.1016/j.cma.2011.11.023 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.07.01910.1016/j.compstruct.2013.07.019 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.05.02610.1016/j.compositesb.2012.05.026 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.09.05210.1016/j.compstruct.2013.09.052 ↗
17. 10.1016/S0263-8223(97)00023-810.1016/S0263-8223(97)00023-8 ↗
18. 10.1016/S0167-6636(02)00195-310.1016/S0167-6636(02)00195-3 ↗
19. 10.1016/S0263-8223(02)00293-310.1016/S0263-8223(02)00293-3 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.11.02910.1016/j.compstruct.2013.11.029 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.07.05610.1016/j.compstruct.2015.07.056 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.jsv.2013.07.01010.1016/j.jsv.2013.07.010 ↗
23. 10.1007/s11012-015-0166-410.1007/s11012-015-0166-4 ↗
24. Tessler A, Di Sciuva M and Gherlone M. Refinement of Timoshenko beam theory for composite and sandwich beams using zigzag kinematics. NASA/TP-2007-215086, November 2007.
25. Gherlone M. Exact formulas for bending of sandwich beams using the Refined Zigzag Theory. In: Proceedings of the XI World Congress on computational mechanics , Barcelona, Spain, 20–25 July 2014.
26. www.rohacell.com.
27. ASTM 857M · 2015
28. ASTM E111 · 2010
29. Iurlaro L. Development of refined models for multilayered composite and sandwich structures: analytical formulation, FEM implementation and experimental assessment . PhD Thesis, Politecnico di Torino, 2015.
30. 10.1016/1359-8368(95)00014-310.1016/1359-8368(95)00014-3 ↗